redwingsphan
Registered User
- Apr 25, 2014
- 325
- 0
Seto scored 40 points while playing injured on the 4th line. Nyquist scored 48 while healthy playing on the top line. While healthy, Nyquist played 97 games and scored 61 points during which time being a year older. When Seto was healthy, he scored 65 points in 81 games.
It's all relevant.
I don't think anyone is saying that he didn't have as much value as nyquist after his 65 pt season. It's that he didn't have as much value as nyquist when he was traded. You continually move the goalposts when you debate things. You say that nyquist had 48 pts, but you fail to add that it was in 57 games and most of those games were without at least one of the wings best players. You say that it was because of injuries. Well those injuries reduced his value.