Post-Game Talk: Drai eats Kraken for lunch

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
16,040
18,154
Anyway OIlers win and Flames lose. Saturday Night Hockey doesn't get better.

In the Flames telecast: "Flames have clearly been the better team but theres the fancy stats and Preds are leading. It was 3-0 at one point. This is the same game Hrudey was saying Flames are playing so damned well. "Remember that time years ago when the Flames were the best team in the galaxy (no I don't) Well, humps Hrudey, the Flames are back there again soooooo guuuuuud soooooo fuuuun to watch. No I don't see it.

lol post game I hard a lot of “the Flames outplayed them in the first though!!!”
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
16,040
18,154
Watching the replay. Team is likely good enough to challenge for the cup again if they can upgrade G.

No more moms trips though. That could have cost them home ice.

Beyond upgrading G, the first step is to stop simply handing teams free goals at the worst possible times. Two games in a row we’ve had the game under total control with the other team showing no signs of life. Then we decide to sift a dumb one east west on the blue line and effectively score in our own net.

Team with no life gets life, they push back, then the goaltending weakness becomes a factor again when the team that couldn’t muster a shot is all of a sudden pushing hard.

This was an issue in the playoffs last year too, Game 7 against the Nucks and Game 5 against the Panthers stick out this way as well. They had nothing, we gave them one for free, they push back and make it a game.

This is a critical issue that isn’t personnel related. They need to drill into this group a style of play when they have multi goal leads, and that can’t include continuing to dick around with the puck in dangerous areas of the ice. It really isn’t hard to just play safe North-South out and in hockey, but they mentally just can not seem to do it.
 

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,479
20,221
Toronto
The question is, where does Skinner play in the top 6. The 2nd line has obvious chemistry and Podz is now putting up a few goals here and there, can't see them taking Nuge out of the top 6 especially with his scoring coming around now so does Skinner play on McDavid's RW?
I don't know, not really seeing an opening currently but he is playing well the last few so maybe he should get a look as a reward.
When fully healthy I would consider running

Kane - McDavid - Kapanen
Podkolzin - Draisaitl - Arvidsson
Skinner - RNH - Hyman
Janmark - Henrique - Brown
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bring Back Bucky

iCanada

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
20,887
22,364
Edmonton
Beyond upgrading G, the first step is to stop simply handing teams free goals at the worst possible times. Two games in a row we’ve had the game under total control with the other team showing no signs of life. Then we decide to sift a dumb one east west on the blue line and effectively score in our own net.

Team with no life gets life, they push back, then the goaltending weakness becomes a factor again when the team that couldn’t muster a shot is all of a sudden pushing hard.

This was an issue in the playoffs last year too, Game 7 against the Nucks and Game 5 against the Panthers stick out this way as well. They had nothing, we gave them one for free, they push back and make it a game.

This is a critical issue that isn’t personnel related. They need to drill into this group a style of play when they have multi goal leads, and that can’t include continuing to dick around with the puck in dangerous areas of the ice. It really isn’t hard to just play safe North-South out and in hockey, but they mentally just can not seem to do it.

I mean it's exactly a personnel issue - all you need to do is get better goaltending. 😂

This is the NHL, the other team is going to get chances for crying out loud.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
16,040
18,154
I mean it's exactly a personnel issue - all you need to do is get better goaltending. 😂

This is the NHL, the other team is going to get chances for crying out loud.

Ugh. I am fully aware of this. Know what other teams also don’t do? Send high risk zero reward passes blind along the offensive blue line with multi goal leads.

What do you think is easier? Acquiring magic better goalie, or just simply not making the dumbest plays imaginable at certain points of the game that are 100% preventable?

You don’t see the teams with goaltending doing this repeatedly like we do, so I don’t understand why it’s just ok for the Oilers to play like absolute morons for no reason other than you wish they had goalies that are expected to save the bushel of preventable breakaways we give up.
 

rboomercat90

Registered User
Mar 24, 2013
15,974
11,195
Edmonton
They could start by having a guy who doesnt actively cheer against the team, sitting next to a guy who is too busy talking about random shit during the play.
What they could immediately do that would make a big improvement imo, is put Louie back in the booth with Jack permanently. It’s when Louie is broadcasting from the players bench where Jack is his most annoying. It’s as if he misses Louie and spends more time talking to him about useless shit to over compensate for that. When they are both in the booth together, like they were for last nights game, they seem to focus more on the game itself.
 

K1984

Registered User
Feb 7, 2008
16,040
18,154
What they could immediately do that would make a big improvement imo, is put Louie back in the booth with Jack permanently. It’s when Louie is broadcasting from the players bench where Jack is his most annoying. It’s as if he misses Louie and spends more time talking to him about useless shit to over compensate for that. When they are both in the booth together, like they were for last nights game, they seem to focus more on the game itself.

I feel like the issue at this point is just Louie in general. He’s devolved to the point where he provides pretty much nothing of substance. 90% of what he says is any of:

- suggesting that nearly every Oiler goal should be subject to review

- agreeing with literally any call that the refs make on the ice

- “shooting mentality”

- “but it was screened/tipped!” (one of those infuriating people that think that basically no screen or tip goal should ever be saved)

- bullshitting with Jack
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,973
22,969
Waterloo Ontario
For what he is paid Skinner's 5 vs 5 goal production has been fine. I am sure the issue for him with Knoblauch has been on the defensive side of the coin. GA when he is on the ice has been too high. But it is coming down. Since Dec 1 he is actually even 5 vs 5 and his own G/60 is actually second highest on the team behind only Hyman. The sample size is too small to read much into this latter stat but at least it is pointing in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K1984

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,977
15,811
Edmonton
For what he is paid Skinner's 5 vs 5 goal production has been fine. I am sure the issue for him with Knoblauch has been on the defensive side of the coin. GA when he is on the ice has been too high. But it is coming down. Since Dec 1 he is actually even 5 vs 5 and his own G/60 is actually second highest on the team behind only Hyman. The sample size is too small to read much into this latter stat but at least it is pointing in the right direction.
I think it will just take Skinner some time to learn how to play on a good team. For his entire career all he had to worry about was scoring goals and individual play since the teams he was on were usually out of the playoff race by game 20.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
47,838
59,356
I think it will just take Skinner some time to learn how to play on a good team. For his entire career all he had to worry about was scoring goals and individual play since the teams he was on were usually out of the playoff race by game 20.
I think that’s exactly what it is. And Knob isn’t punishing him per se, just giving him low responsibility minutes as he figures out how to play within this system. Skinner seems like he’ll be smart enough and a pro enough to figure it out though. I bet he gets back to a top 6 role on this team, the story ain’t over with Skinner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke74

Bring Back Bucky

Registered User
May 19, 2004
10,448
4,042
Canadas Ocean Playground
I think that’s exactly what it is. And Knob isn’t punishing him per se, just giving him low responsibility minutes as he figures out how to play within this system. Skinner seems like he’ll be smart enough and a pro enough to figure it out though. I bet he gets back to a top 6 role on this team, the story ain’t over with Skinner.
10 days ago I declared it over. Apparently he and Knob read that and are trying to disprove me. I’m sure hoping I am wrong !
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
47,838
59,356
10 days ago I declared it over. Apparently he and Knob read that and are trying to disprove me. I’m sure hoping I am wrong !
One thing that seems consistent with Oilers management, either now or in the past, is that they aren’t cutthroat and tend to see their commitments through. I didn’t think they’d be cutthroat enough to call it quits on Skinner 3 months into his tenure here. Not a good look when you’ve always been a UFA-starved location looking to attract UFAs every year. It would be in everyone’s best interests to have the Skinner experiment work, so I see it continuing until and if it becomes completely untenable. But really I don’t see that happening, not much damage can be done “defensively” with Skinner in a 4th line role, and producing from that role is a benefit to this team. That’s the floor of the Skinner experiment and I think the ceiling is still very attainable, with Skinner being a Top 6 contributor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Duke74 and Oilhawks

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad