HF Habs: - Draft Lottery tonight!! 7 p.m. ET. (MTL with #16 and #17!!) | Page 15 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

HF Habs: Draft Lottery tonight!! 7 p.m. ET. (MTL with #16 and #17!!)

If we lost the last game of the season in regulation we'd be drafting 4th OA. Canucks would be ahead of us, Columbus makes the playoffs, and we would be 14th spot. Schaefer/Misa/Hagens/Martone vs playoff experience.

EDIT: We would be in the 13th spot
Can always tank next year!
 
There were only 20 PPG players in the league this year. That's not very many "core" players.
Heres the list of comparables for Coles production, because thats what he is, production. Whos core in there? Rakell? Debrincat? Larkin for sure. Tuch? Old man Kadri?

Theres more than just PPGs, theres playstyle and position and age that come into play. In Caufields case, what does he bring if not production? Thus, hes judged on production.

There should be abour 0 to 4 core players per team. Some teams, like the Flames and Kraken dont even have one.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250506_091051_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250506_091051_Chrome.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 5
  • Haha
Reactions: Paradoxe
Heres the list of comparables for Coles production, because thats what he is, production. Whos core in there? Rakell? Debrincat? Larkin for sure. Tuch? Old man Kadri?

Theres more than just PPGs, theres playstyle and position and age that come into play. In Caufields case, what does he bring if not production? Thus, hes judged on production.

There should be abour 0 to 4 core players per team. Some teams, like the Flames and Kraken dont even have one.
Cole is not just a goal scorer, his 2 way game has vastly improved. I think anyone who has watched him progress since his rookie season can attest to it.

It's one thing not to like a certain player, we all have them, but it's another to lie to yourself about their worth to their team.

Anyways, I think we'll never come to an agreement on Cole, so I'll just let it be.
 
Cole is not just a goal scorer, his 2 way game has vastly improved. I think anyone who has watched him progress since his rookie season can attest to it.

It's one thing not to like a certain player, we all have them, but it's another to lie to yourself about their worth to their team.

Anyways, I think we'll never come to an agreement on Cole, so I'll just let it be.
Okay his two way game has progressed from the gutter to NHL average, that doesnt make it a strength.

Is it not liking a player to say that a guy that got 70 points, has severe size limitations and isnt good defensively isnt a core player? Every team has Caufield in a different font. Ehlers, Debrincat, Terry, Peterka, Huberdeau, etc. None of them are core players.

To be a core player you need to be a 1C, 1D, 1W, 1G.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 9_31_04 pm.png
    Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 9_31_04 pm.png
    193.9 KB · Views: 6
  • Haha
Reactions: Paradoxe
Considering the possible outcomes, the Habs had the best outcome of ALL Atlantic Division teams.

Boston = moved down 2 spots (worst possible outcome)
Buffalo = moved down 2 spots (worst possible outcome)

Detroit = moved down 1 spot (worst possible "reasonable" outcome)*

Montreal = kept their #16 pick from Calgary (best possible outcome)**

Ottawa, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Florida = all of them (along with Montreal) would be glad to see what happened to Boston, Buffalo and Detroit, but unlike Montreal all would have hoped that Calgary would win one of the 2 lottery picks and jump to #6 so that the Habs would get the pick Florida traded to Calgary.

*Detroit could have dropped 2 spots but the chance of 2 of the 4 teams after them winning the 2 lottery draws was insignificant, something like 0.3%.

** The only thing possible that would have made the lottery better for Montreal would have been if a Western Conference team with one of the later picks (Anaheim or Vancouver) would have won the 1st lottery instead of the Islanders, but all teams in the Atlantic share that benefit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gravity
If we lost the last game of the season in regulation we'd be drafting 4th OA. Canucks would be ahead of us, Columbus makes the playoffs, and we would be 14th spot. Schaefer/Misa/Hagens/Martone vs playoff experience.

EDIT: We would be in the 13th spot

It took the effect of 82 games to place the Habs where they are.

What if primeau didn't crap the bed?
What if the Habs didn't start the season with a 4-9-2 record? What if they didn't blow a game late against Columbus? What if they didnt blow a 2 goal 3rd period lead in Seattle? What if they didn't blow a 3-0 lead to Toronto?

It goes on and on....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz
The issue for me is not the AAV of $8.7M. Two years is not "tying up". We did the exact same for Patrik Laine.

My problem is giving up both first round picks for a single two year rental.

Bring down the acquisition cost and we can talk.

Yeah, I mean you don’t go all in on a 38 yr old I agree
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
36 guys had 82 points or more...I must've counted wrong. Thx.

23 guys had 82 points or more.

36 guys had as many or more points as games played (point per game).

Guys like Kaprizov, Matthews, Thomas, Ovechkin, J. Hughes, Q. Hughes, M. Tkachuk, Barkov, etc. didn't hit 82 points, but were safely P/GP players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deebs
Any projected 6'2 second line centers available to us at the draft lol??
That can step in next year? Misa at 1OA/2OA. So I'd say, realistically, no.

Frondell, Desnoyers, O'Brien, and Martin all project well as top-6 centers but are likely out of our range without moving up. McQueen is massive and skilled but I think the number of significant back injuries he's had puts a damper on how confident most would be picking him. I'd estimate around ~3 years as a very optimistic projection for the potential of seeing any of these guys as effective, every game 2Cs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adriatic
Please god no, a 38 yr old Crosby , tying up 8.5 and we are rebuilding. Enough stop gaps, get guys who can play another 10 years.

Rebuild is over. These are transition years.

Who is that guy we can get that plays with us for 10 years? List names!

No way I say no to Crosby but that depends on the price. If they want a grade A like Reinbacher or Hage, I pass. The offers are more likely to be both our 1st rounders (16/17) and a prospect like Beck or Kapanen or Mailloux. Anything deeper than that, I pass. That's my line.

Crosby would fit this roster very well IMO. Imagine Demidov with Crosby bud? You don't think Crosby helps the development and leadership on our team? I'd rethink that one.
 
None that seems to be going around #16-17. Bear, Cootes and Martin are 6'. The big centers are going top 15.

Any center drafted in this draft at 16/17 is likely 5 years away from being able to provide impact in the NHL. If we are lucky, Hage reaches it sooner as it was a deeper draft last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whalers Fan

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad