Prospect Info: Draft 2025 Habs your on the clock

[Doublechin]

Give me Brady Martin.

How are you getting a top 10 pick?

 

[KevSkillz4]

Depends who will be there, but 16 and 17 are pretty good spots to draft something very good.

But if we can acquire a top 6 C with both picks, l'et's do it.

 

[MTL Dirty Birdy]

Would you be fine with this?

Who is most likely to *fall* to 16 and who would you pick earlier among the guys ranked 18-25?

View attachment 1027330

That would add much needed bite to our core

 

[KevSkillz4]

Would you be fine with this?

Who is most likely to *fall* to 16 and who would you pick earlier among the guys ranked 18-25?

View attachment 1027330

I really like both, that would be a very good picks right there.

 

[ahmedou]

Draft picks. And Trade Values.

 

[ChesterNimitz]

Give me Brady Martin.

Move up, if necessary to be in a position to draft him. However, never overpay or overreach. It always ends up biting you in the ass, whether in team building in the NHL or anything else in life.

 

[JeffreyLFC]

Draft picks. And Trade Values.

View attachment 1029884

I think this year the value chart would be different. I see top 10 picks as having significantly more value than all other picks. From 11 to 30, the difference is minimal.

 

[TeacherMan]

I think this year the value chart would be different. I see top 10 picks as having significantly more value than all other picks. From 11 to 30, the difference is minimal.

I think you're right. Based on those values, we could trade bot of our top picks and land Desnoyers.

 

[Habs13]

16. Spence
17. Lakovic

Somehow trade up to 8th and steal Mrkta, too

 

[BozoTheClown]

For 3 consecutive years, Montreal traded at total of 3 x 1st, 2 x 2nd and a 3rd for bottom 6 forwards. It won’t be any different this time around.

Keep the picks are draft well.

 

[austin316]

Wouldn’t get too tied up with our first round picks. I expect both of them to be moved.

 

[MTL Dirty Birdy]

For 3 consecutive years, Montreal traded at total of 3 x 1st, 2 x 2nd and a 3rd for bottom 6 forwards. It won’t be any different this time around.

Keep the picks are draft well.

If Dachs health can stay up he is a top 6 forward. I find this comment a little disingenuous.

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

Can the title be switched to "you're"

Also, welcome to offseason where there's 3, or 4 threads talking about the same stuff.

 

[BozoTheClown]

If Dachs health can stay up he is a top 6 forward. I find this comment a little disingenuous.

Dach is often injured from his lack of work ethics which probably led to the weight gain, not being in shape and not taking his rehabilitation and physiotherapy as seriously as he should.

 

[Deebs]

Craig Button’s Mock Draft: New York Islanders take defenceman Matthew Schaefer at No. 1 | TSN

The New York Islanders will select first overall in the 2025 NHL Draft after winning the draft lottery and TSN Director of Scouting Craig Button has them addressing the blueline, selecting Erie Otters defenceman Matthew Schaefer at No. 1.

www.tsn.ca

 

[le_sean]

If Dachs health can stay up he is a top 6 forward. I find this comment a little disingenuous.

His 82 game average is 37 points -16. He’s not a Top 6 forward. Way too inconsistent.

 

[sampollock]

I feel KH will move 1 if not both 1st

Carbo is a interesting prospect

 

[Beaker]

Thoughts on Carbonneau?

I like his Anderson-like powerful skating with some offensive ability but I haven’t seen much.

 

[MTL Dirty Birdy]

His 82 game average is 37 points -16. He’s not a Top 6 forward. Way too inconsistent.

Taking an average when he has the injury history he has doesn’t work. When players come back they’re not back 100%. And the degree of injury he has had can take up to a year to get back. He needs a solid season of health to show his value

 

[waitin425]

Habs will have the structure of a trade prepared pre-draft. I have no doubt about it. It's possible they don't pull the trigger on the deal if someone they want is available (I hope Martin).

The "we have a trade to announce" decision is one that will be made on the draft floor.

 

[Ozmodiar]

Would you be fine with this?

Who is most likely to *fall* to 16 and who would you pick earlier among the guys ranked 18-25?

View attachment 1027330

Those are my 2 picks.

Need grit and … definitely need to add a Defenseman.

 

[Andrei79]

If Dachs health can stay up he is a top 6 forward. I find this comment a little disingenuous.

There's also a first that came out of nowhere. I'm guessing it's Dvorak ? But that's previous management. Not all firsts are equal either. In any case, this management at least has made all kinds of moves. They trade players for firsts. They get paid firsts to take on contracts. They move up in the draft of they feel it's worth it. They trade firsts for players they value. Not all moves will work, but the reasoning behind the moves will likely eventually result in a solid acquisition. It was actually working with Dach until Tinordi destroyed his knee.

 

[le_sean]

Taking an average when he has the injury history he has doesn’t work. When players come back they’re not back 100%. And the degree of injury he has had can take up to a year to get back. He needs a solid season of health to show his value

Then you want his most recent season where he was -29 in 57 games and on pace for 32 points? Come on, what are we doing here. He is 24 years old and it’s excuse after excuse. Newsflash: he’s never going to be healthy. He’s incapable of it.

 

[DemidovSZN]

I like Nesbitt at 16th if guys like Bear, Lakovic, aren’t available. A 6’4 left handed centerman who can play physical and good around the net.

The guy I would want most is Martin but he clearly won’t be there. Maybe they trade up to get him but we have no idea how high he could go.

Bear with his injury might drop a little to around 12-13 but not 16. One of my favorite too.

 

[HabsTown]

I’d be very very careful with the ‘’more grit’’ wishes. This is a recency bias and could bite us in the a**. Do NOT draft on current needs.

History will keep repeating itself. We did the same following Boston series then we overeached for a 6’6 Mccaron and plenty other wasteful picks solely based on ‘’size’’.