Nico Cauzuki
Registered User
should be an interesting draft/offseason almost certain some picks will get traded for immediate help
why you have no favorites?
this is just for fun.I do but it's unpredictable after the top 9. I could say Brady Martin but he's gone at 10.
yesMcQueen if he falls for injury concerns, but more realistically Carbonneau/Aitcheson/Mrtka would be my targets.
Roger has spondylolysis, which is kind of a stress fracture of the pars articularis of a lumbar vertebrae we see in young, active people.yes
Steve McQ is interesting forsure
very bad inj's?
awesome reportRoger has spondylolysis, which is kind of a stress fracture of the pars articularis of a lumbar vertebrae we see in young, active people.
Prognosis is excellent. Nothing to do with a symptomatic herniated disc like Lindstrom (I had Lindstrom has a DND in the top 10 last year even if he was a consensus top 5 pick for that reason)... But there is no zero risk...
I'd say the risk is worth it here.
I'd not hesitate to trade up to 9-10 if he's still there.
Isles did not make the final in 20...............that was TB and Dallas.Everyone is like WE MUST TRADE EVERYONE
View attachment 1027223
But personally i think we must be very cautious.
COuple of years ago NYI were in a very good spot. They had 22 years old Barzal, 27 years old Nelson, 29 years old Lee, 29 years old Bailey, 22 years old Beauvillier, 25 years old Devan Toews, 28 years old Leddy, 25 years old Pelech, 24 years old Pulock, 19 years old Dobson, 24 uears old Sorokin.
They got to the cup final in 20 and semis in 21. With Dobson, Sorokin, Barzal and good vets future looked bright. Then they decided to trade EVERYONE. Traded a 13th overall (Narzal) for Romanov. TRaded a 1st and Raty for Horvat. TRaded a 1st, 2nd and 3rd for Pageau, Traded two 2nd and a 3rd to dump Andrew Ladd's contract, Traded a 3rd for Engvail.
The end result? They have to rebuilt again 5 years later. KH must be very cautious. Don't trade everyone and make sure they players you acquire have at least 4-5 more years of prime left or are very cheap.
Matheson is not a cap dump don't be silly. He has his flaws but there's one year remaining at 4.7 and he's a serviceable 4th dman for a team looking for a guy able to carry the puck and have a defensive RHD like Parayko to play with him.Matheson is the contract dump. And the two picks are in a garbage draft at a spot where all first two tiers of players will probably all be gone
Dude, Matheson is not a contract dump, he has 1 year left on his deal at 4.875. The problem is that he is not a top 2 defenseman playing in that role currently with us. Have him play minutes of a #4-5 and see how valuable he would become. That's why I think a top 3 defenseman is a must going forward along with a #2 center
Yesh i forgot about the stupid covid tournament they played 22 games which usually means cup final (maximum of games played for a semis usually is 21), Did not really watch the playoffs during COVID.Isles did not make the final in 20...............that was TB and Dallas.
I think he can be a really useful player for us next season if he is used properly and that's like a #4 with some pp2 time as well.. He cannot play as a #2 like he was asked this year, it's quite evident.I don't mean literally. He still has value which is why he's included in the trade and not someone like Gallagher or Laine. Contract dumb just refers to having to give back a contract
Desnoyers is firmly in top 5 discussion.this is just for fun.
I know its easier after the draft is over, but interesting what we all see in guys
dont worry you wont be held to the name you like if the habs dont get him
I like Martin too
or
Desnoryers flashy not sure on this grit though
It's like when Gallagher - Danault - Tatar was our first line. I was hoping there would be a day when they would be our 3rd line. I would be very happy with Matheson - Carrier as our 3rd pair, to say the least:Dude, Matheson is not a contract dump, he has 1 year left on his deal at 4.875. The problem is that he is not a top 2 defenseman playing in that role currently with us. Have him play minutes of a #4-5 and see how valuable he would become. That's why I think a top 3 defenseman is a must going forward along with a #2 center
I knowCan't wait for the draft!
It always seems like a long wait. It's a little shorter this year after making the first round of the playoffs, but it's still a damn long wait!
I think he can be a really useful player for us next season if he is used properly and that's like a #4 with some pp2 time as well.. He cannot play as a #2 like he was asked this year, it's quite evident.
Also, we can't assume Reinbacher is ready to come in and play like a top 3, a lot of people are penciling him that way, I hope KH has him coming in as a #6 just for example, and whatever happens is gravy from there on out! That's how I would approach it
Agreed.It's like when Gallagher - Danault - Tatar was our first line. I was hoping there would be a day when they would be our 3rd line. I would be very happy with Matheson - Carrier as our 3rd pair, to say the least:
Hutson - Reinbacher
Guhle - UFA RD
Matheson - Carrier
what I read defense is a issue with him?What do you guys think of the Russian center:
Ivan Ryabkin
After trading our picks for Dach and Newhook, I kinda lose confidence. Maybe, using our picks to draft a player would be better.should be an interesting draft/offseason almost certain some picks will get traded for immediate help