Drew doesn't stand a chance, not enough points.
Norris - best defenseman......my ass
best scoring defenseman, playing D has nothing to do with the award any longer. this award NEEDS to be separated - period. one for best defenseman based on offensive stats and one based on defensive stats.
the Norris imo now is a joke. when guys like Karlsson win this my point is proven, the guy is a #3-6 Dman when you look at his overall game. world class with the puck, average at best without the puck and defending his zone. Karlsson is no Lidstrom, who many compare him to. bs, Lidstrom wasn't a defensive liability.
Subban is a mix between Karlsson and Drew i think. better defensively than karlsson and better offensively than drew. a few more years of experience and i think Subban will be lights out.
DD on the other hand is truly an overall Dman. he was worked for and improved his D capability each year. offense was never a question, it was how well he could defend. i think he has been the best overall (some would say best shut down) D in the world for the past 2 or 3 years.
his major weakness continues to be the PP, he is NOT a PP QB. i believe he is still best used on the PP on the off wing as a shooter. which presents his second weakness - often times he takes to long to shoot if not a one-timer. yeah he takes some crazy chances that sometimes leads to a turnover and a goal here and there. those are it.
the guy is rock solid on both ends. give every coach in the NHL the chance to select one of these three as their only D and i bet DD gets picked easily by over 50% of them. i would bet it would be something in the 70-80% area.