Should have been done months ago, instead they give him the most minutes and allow him to pad his stats and demand more money. The management team is a bigger loser than the core. Vegas would have punted his ass out of here months ago.
So turns out, the thing people were yelling would erase all possibility of a cup, didn't erase all possibility of a cup. And that's not even counting the additional players that were making between 9-10m, or the wasted cap. Turns out, those 10m players were actually pretty darn important to their cup win.
It's crazy that you can see the future and you waste it on this.
No, but they're a lot closer than you'll ever admit.
I was referring to the low percentage passing (between the legs), down 4 goals.
Ive noticed that since coming back from 4nations he's turned up the volume on the fancy stuff.
I like Mitch but your comment does not bode well for our playoff chances
Ya, I’m not here bashing or on a MM witch hunt. He’s a great player.
Agreed. The very very few times he's gone to the net this year, he's actually been rewarded. Just can't get him to play a simple, typical style. Look at Crosby, Mcd and Mackinnon at 4 nations... none of that fancy stuff...always low in the zone and always around the net after a shot.
I didn't say that you said in your post that recent teams didn't have a 10m dollar player. I pointed out that that argument you were referencing ended up being wrong. Though for the record, bringing up a claim, saying that it was proven a couple years ago, and not mentioning that it was disproven over the past 2 years is pretty misleading.
www.nhl.com
It's not disproven... Vegas won while being 8 million over the cap and the cap went up 6 million when Fla won. So the point still applies lol
It was disproven. Teams with 10m players won cups. Thus, the claim that a team couldn't win with a 10m player was wrong. People tried to explain that salaries rise with the cap, but the people making this ridiculous claim wouldn't listen.
Teams with all sorts of different configurations win cups. The lesson is to stop pretending you need A, B, and C but not X, Y, and Z to win. Your best chance to win is whatever gives you the best team. For us, that's keeping Matthews and Marner.
Their is the stars just have to be on there own line that’s where our advantage is 3rd pair d have to face one of them chief isn’t too sharp right now
The answer is no because your arbitrary criteria eliminates the overwhelming majority of teams, both now and throughout history. It has happened by percentage.
We literally destroyed Vegas the last time we met them this season. It means nothing.
