Slamming the door on his teammates after Muzzin flipped a puck at him. Not doing anything but yap after somebody took his mouthguard and slapped it away. I could just imagine the heat Mathews would take if that happened to him.Negative stuff?
Slamming the door on his teammates after Muzzin flipped a puck at him. Not doing anything but yap after somebody took his mouthguard and slapped it away. I could just imagine the heat Mathews would take if that happened to him.Negative stuff?
Slamming the door on his teammates after Muzzin flipped a puck at him. Not doing anything but yap after somebody took his mouthguard and slapped it away. I could just imagine the heat Mathews would take if that happened to him.
Oh, actually positive stuff.Slamming the door on his teammates after Muzzin flipped a puck at him. Not doing anything but yap after somebody took his mouthguard and slapped it away. I could just imagine the heat Mathews would take if that happened to him.
I sort of agree, showing emotion is good. However most look at it negatively, similar to Marner throwing his gloves.Oh, actually positive stuff.
We saw what Matthews does and we heard what Chiarot had to say about it.
Such a strange thing that the weaker player gets deployed more minutes per game consistently.Nylander is the ceiling. Tough to expect the weaker player to take more and taking a discount would be great.
That's a hell of a nice scapegoat campaign y'all got goin on Keefe
Wasn't even a Keefe fan at all (quite the opposite) but y'all really are pinning Mitch's playoff choking on him
This years Fla Panthers would have won with or without Tkachuk. Bob was outstanding. The team played an aggressive style that took away time and space.To extend a cheesy car analogy.
Auston Matthews is a Lamborghini. That’s great. Matthew Tkachuk is a Land Rover which is less glamorous and more utilitarian.
Tkachuk got you to where you needed to go, in tough conditions and you have no regrets about the whole journey, you rest easy sipping a beer out of a mug.
Meanwhile Matthews still needs to make that journey himself, and is unproven over uncertain terrain and tough conditions up ahead. You think the Lambo is a better car but is it?
To extend a cheesy car analogy.
Auston Matthews is a Lamborghini. That’s great. Matthew Tkachuk is a Land Rover which is less glamorous and more utilitarian.
Tkachuk got you to where you needed to go, in tough conditions and you have no regrets about the whole journey, you rest easy sipping a beer out of a mug.
Meanwhile Matthews still needs to make that journey himself, and is unproven over uncertain terrain and tough conditions up ahead. You think the Lambo is a better car but is it?
I don't think anyone is saying he's the only problem. But if you have a broken leg, a sprained finger, three bruises and hair loss, you should know which needs to be fixed first.You'd think reasonable people would understand that point. It's really not a hard concept to grasp. I guess there is a level of immaturity in every fan base.
Sarcastic in the phrasing.Not sure if you are being serious or sarcastic?
Maybe all you have to do is wait until the cap hits $150M.Probably, but what does it take for those things to happen? The players must be good enough.
When a team with 5 players making 10 million wins a Cup, I assure you they will have to sacrifice in order to do it.
That is exactly why we now have a new coach or do you think Keefe was doing a good jobSuch a strange thing that the weaker player gets deployed more minutes per game consistently.
You are going to have to really polish this turd of a statement a lot more
Me either……my game is weak today. lolThis is a Mess!
New exercise, compare the same players you are, but now, over the same timeframe.
View attachment 898778View attachment 898779
I wonder why you chose career for one player and not the other... completely honest and no motive, good job.
Career wise Matthews and Marner > Tkachuk for PPG, just incase you want to compare careers.
Matthews is better than Tkachuk in the playoffs, so I really don't understand this logic.
Paul, your weak attempts at shaming don't work on me. Or anyone else for that matter.His forum handle was in the quote you copied into your response but you couldn't get it correct in your post? Simply lazy.
Uh oh. Hellkitty's gone frantic too. Six posts in a row?Not sure if you are being serious or sarcastic?
Certainly a strange thing, and I don't want to polish that turd Keefe - let's see what happens under a real coach.Such a strange thing that the weaker player gets deployed more minutes per game consistently.
You are going to have to really polish this turd of a statement a lot more
I like both instances. I also loved what Muzzin did to Tkachuk.I sort of agree, showing emotion is good. However most look at it negatively, similar to Marner throwing his gloves.
"This group needs a little more sandpaper. They need more grit where their top-six is concerned. You look at that list of candidates in their top-six and I go back to the Florida series. The trouble that club had with Tkachuk and Bennett. Both players who factor in the top six for the Florida Panthers. I know the Leafs covet that kind of gritty presence as part of your top six, who can also generate top-end offensive numbers...
It'll be a haul. I got to believe there'll be a solid, established impact NHL player as part of the mix and perhaps a mix of picks and prospects... But it should be a rich return without question."
Marner's current contract is the floor, always was. If Nylander took 9 are you saying Marner would accept less than he's currently making? Also Marner will use his cap percentage not dollar figures, what does his existing cap % equate to under the new cap? Wasn't it around 11.7 or something like that? He's going to be looking for a bump in his cap percentage so that takes him to 12.5 x 8Nylander is the floor. Tough to expect the better player to take less although taking a discount would be great.
I don't think anyone is saying he's the only problem. But if you have a broken leg, a sprained finger, three bruises and hair loss, you should know which needs to be fixed first.
Sarcastic in the phrasing.
Former NHLer and current NHL Network analyst Stu Grimson revealed the expected return for the Toronto Maple Leafs if they were to trade Mitch Marner.
At this point, many across the NHL, fans included, expect Leafs forward Mitch Marner to play out the final year of his six-year deal rather than sign an extension or approve a trade. However, should the Leafs trade the 27-year-old, current NHL Network analyst and former NHLer Stu Grimson believes that the Leafs will be looking for one specific type of player in return.
Expected trade return for Mitch Marner now known, thanks to NHL analyst
Former NHLer and current NHL Network analyst Stu Grimson revealed the expected return for the Toronto Maple Leafs if they were to trade Mitch Marner.www.mapleleafsdaily.com
Marner's current contract is the floor, always was. If Nylander took 9 are you saying Marner would accept less than he's currently making? Also Marner will use his cap percentage not dollar figures, what does his existing cap % equate to under the new cap? Wasn't it around 11.7 or something like that? He's going to be looking for a bump in his cap percentage so that takes him to 12.5 x 8
Ferris took advantage of Dubie and priced Mitch out of the market. Now he's likely having discussions that are not as pleasant as the first go around. Much more fun at the circus.Marner's current contract is the floor, always was. If Nylander took 9 are you saying Marner would accept less than he's currently making? Also Marner will use his cap percentage not dollar figures, what does his existing cap % equate to under the new cap? Wasn't it around 11.7 or something like that? He's going to be looking for a bump in his cap percentage so that takes him to 12.5 x 8
Former NHLer and current NHL Network analyst Stu Grimson revealed the expected return for the Toronto Maple Leafs if they were to trade Mitch Marner.
At this point, many across the NHL, fans included, expect Leafs forward Mitch Marner to play out the final year of his six-year deal rather than sign an extension or approve a trade. However, should the Leafs trade the 27-year-old, current NHL Network analyst and former NHLer Stu Grimson believes that the Leafs will be looking for one specific type of player in return.
Expected trade return for Mitch Marner now known, thanks to NHL analyst
Former NHLer and current NHL Network analyst Stu Grimson revealed the expected return for the Toronto Maple Leafs if they were to trade Mitch Marner.www.mapleleafsdaily.com
He’s only accepting that over 4 or 5 yrs in Toronto and I don’t blame him. There are 25-30 better places to live so 8 yrs in Toronto is 13.75- 14.25.You nailed it IMO. @$12.56 mil per over 8 years....