HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 19,416
- 29,669
Jim Benning probably still has talent for scouting players, but you also probably would want to remove decision making from his responsibilities.
Just have Jim travel and scout, allow him to contribute when making the draft list, but don't ever let him have control.
Did Jason Bottorill or Chiarelli have any trades like the Miller deal ? I'm just asking. Maybe they didNo team should ever have to go through what Vancouver fans did for 10 years with Benning.
Miller turned out but even there Benning had to Benning. Tampa was way over the cap and basically advertised they needed to move players out. Miller was a $5M+ third line centre at the time. Benning had the leverage and still forked over a 1st round pick+.Did Jason Bottorill or Chiarelli have any trades like the Miller deal ? I'm just asking. Maybe they did
Jim Benning is an absolutely terrible scout who wanted to take Jake Virtanen, Olli Juolevi, and Cody Glass over the Canuck scouting staff who wanted Larkin/Tkachuk/Pettersson with those successive top-6 picks.
Couldn’t pro scout an effective NHL defender in 9 years.
The guy has no idea what he’s looking at when he’s watching a hockey game.
His scouting record before Vancouver was really bad in Boston too. The main reason he’s thought of as a good scout is because he likes to do it and his favourite traits are the loud skills that can maybe play up of the other more important skillsAgain, Benning shouldn't be responsible for making decisions. I believe he would still be a viable asset to an organization as a scout, purely, as a scout.
Been a decade. Gillis is like 65. Hasn’t stayed connnected with the NHL game. I mean who has he worked with that would vouch for him?I think he probably does, but he shouldn't.
Mike Gillis on the other hand... he's been choosy but I think he eventually gets back to being a GM.
he's a horrible GM, could be a good add as a scout