Does Canada have an answer to the Tkachuks?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I'd also argue hockey is faster on the smaller ice. Big ice has never, to me, meant faster hockey or more scoring. As I've aged, I actually prefer the smaller ice and hope everyone adopts the smaller rinks.

Part of the issue for me was only seeing national teams playing on international ice, so we conflated the size of the ice with the sheer talent of the teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
Part of the issue for me was only seeing national teams playing on international ice, so we conflated the size of the ice with the sheer talent of the teams.
It was a lockout.. maybe 2005 and all they showed on TSN was poker and big ice games.lol It felt slower and less physical to me and more tactical (like soccer which the poster above me just said). So it suits fast skaters who don't like contact. But if you want lightning fast plays.. put a bunch of 6 foot to 6'6 200 to 230lb guys on a small rink. You need to be much quicker in tight!

You said you had kids in hockey.. same thing.. they used to make them play on the big rink.. then they split it into 3 and hockey improved from it IMO. Hockey is about quick decisions and fast plays. That's small ice for me personally. And I used to be a make it all Olympic ice type of guy. One of the many views I've changed over the years.
 
I didn't even notice the Tkachuk brothers tonight! I thought the game was even. Either team could have won that one, and the USA got us tonight. This happened in 2010 as well, so will see how the rest of the tourney shakes out.
 
Barely heard their names after their fights until they started talking about Matthew getting hurt. 0 points and one of them couldn't even finish the game, so I dunno, not the biggest problem this time around.
 
Bennett and Marchand are Canada's answer but it doesn't matter when Cooper gives them less than 7mins total ice time and plays Hagel and Cirelli over them. 🥹
 
Bennett and Marchand are Canada's answer but it doesn't matter when Cooper gives them less than 7mins total ice time and plays Hagel and Cirelli over them. 🥹
Hagel and Cirelli played d-zone face offs and PK mostly. I didn't like the late game line shuffles. Cooper overthinking as usual. No Makar made it rough for Canada.

(I am probably wrong about the Hagel/Cirelli ice time).
 
Do you really think Canada lost because of the Tampa players? The Tampa line shutdown the Tkachuk line meanwhile Crosby and Mackinnon were getting favorable matchups and still were dashes

Nope - read the thread.

He said Canada lost because they had Marner. I pointed out they had more Tampa players. The Leafs only having a winning record in the playoffs against one team in the last 20 years and it's Tampa and the Tampa fans always make it about the Leafs because of that.
 
Nope - read the thread.

He said Canada lost because they had Marner. I pointed out they had more Tampa players. The Leafs only having a winning record in the playoffs against one team in the last 20 years and it's Tampa and the Tampa fans always make it about the Leafs because of that.
Tampa players did as well. Stacked the team with them and they sucked.
? also Tampa is 1 and 1 against the Leafs in the playoffs
 
3 Tampa players contributed as much as Marner
Okay, its been 2 games and Marner is playing in the top 6. By this logic Guentzel is 4x better than Marner
3 Tampa players combined contributed as much as Marner this tournament



Sure, if you only count series.

In games, the Leafs are 7-6 against Tampa in the playoffs.

Hence, the losing record.
Why would the amount of games matter? You either win the series or you don't
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad