lebdafor norris
sleepy
- Mar 14, 2011
- 3,828
- 889
So because the Leafs highly touted and expensive offence couldn't perform up to standards (or anywhere near it for that matter during the CBJ series) its now up to Andy to cover for them and if he fails its all his fault not on the offence that failed to produce yet again? Scoring chances falls in the same category as xGA both are highly inaccurate stat, that needs a massive change in thw shot quality data in order to be more informative on its own.Thomas and Hasek were usually the best goalies in the series, Fred wasn't.
The offense was (and is) heavily criticized for that series, but they also generated similar scoring chances to what they did in the regular season with less of a return. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the chance against metrics were better for the Leafs in the playoffs where they also faced a team with less effective scorers than they were in the regular season, so we should expect a better Fred.
Last year was Fred's best playoff performance and it comes with a brutal game 3, a poor GWG in Game 1 and a huge backbreaker in Game 5. Some of those are going to happen, you can write some of it off to luck/bounce, but it's also happened literally every playoff with the Leafs.
Take any one of these as an individual series loss and you can move on, 4 losses in a row - 3 blow elimination games on the back of bad goals - the last 2 coming with absolutely horrific goals in key times, these aren't good patterns.
Whats this game 5 back breaking goal your even talking about, CBJ scored a grand total of 2 goals against Freddy in game 5, you telling me this offence that needed to proved a statement after the previous playoff woes against Boston and the Babcock firing, gave up after CBJ scored 1 goal in the last game of the series? That is a loser's mentality, if that actually the Leafs way of thinking then they deserved to be eliminated in the 1st round every single year, this a top 5, high powered offence with shoddy defence that only allowed 2 goals in the elimination game yet you are acting like Freddy allowed 6 goals in the 1st period essentially putting the game away.
Also, Freddy allowed 1 goal in 34 shots in game 1, but sure he was the reason for the L not the top 5 offence that couldn't even get 1 after the Leaf's shoddy defence and steady goaltending gave them a near perfect breathing room, YOU KNOW WHATS MORE BACK BREAKING THAN THE GOALS ANDY GAVE UP? ITS WATCHING THE TOP 5 OFFENCE GET WALLED THE WHOLE GAME.
As for the bolded, the Leafs top 5 offence scored 1 goal, yes 1 measly goal by JT in their last 2 , game 7/5 elimination game COMBINED against Boston and CBJ while Andy allowed 5 goals combined for those 2 games, that is a 2.5 GAA, yet here you solely putting the blame on Andy's feet. The offence should be in the hot seat here, moreso than Andy.
Last edited: