IE, i was thinking about your Nels Stewart defensive ability research and I think what would help me trust it more would be to get the context of his teammates.
is Nels getting one positive mention and Hooley is getting ten? And is Nels getting ten negative comments to his one positive?
A big undertaking but it would help to understand how valuable one/ten/fifty etc mentions really are. But that’s a **** tonne of work.
I'm going to do the best I can to deliver that.
Honestly, before this draft Nels Stewart was considered slow as molasses. That is the first stereotype we associate with him. Toe Blake flat out refutes that, along with a number of game reports. I don't know what else I can do to convince people that, while he wasn't Howie Morenz, he certainly should no longer be considered the pylon he was a month or 2 ago.
The Montreal Gazette - Google News Archive Search
Beliveau has often been likened to the late Nels Stewart. Toe Blake was asked if Stewart was a slow skater, as has been alleged.
"I've heard that and it wasn't true," he said. "You couldn't catch him from behind. He didn't look to be going fast because he took those long strides. Beliveau is like that, too."
And let's not forget that Blake wouldn't have played against Stewart during his prime. His first NHL game was in 1934-35 when Stewart was already 32. Blake was only in Jr hockey at 17 when Stewart was 29 years old. Plus, i'd wonder how many games he would have seen as a youngster considering he wasn't from Montreal. He was an Ontario kid.
He directly compares his skating to Beliveau, while first saying that the typical stereotypes we've all (ATD geniuses that we are
![grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/grin.gif)
) believed are flat out wrong. To me it doesn't get much clearer than that. There are also game reports that describe him like lighting among other phrases that make him seem anything but a turnstile. If those things don't change the perception by a decent amount, I'm guessing nothing ever will.
As far as his defense. Surprisingly there aren't many negative remarks on it. There are some, but honestly they have more to do with him becoming lackadaisical over the course of the game, then specifically referring to poor defense. And I'm talking about a handful of events. Again, this is through the vast majority of his Maroon days, which is just shy of his 30th birthday. So his peak and prime are chock full of praise for his defensive game, a far cry from the story we've all thought since the ATD became a thing. Remember Nels, a month ago had zero defensive value. He was on the same tier as Bill Cowley and Gordie Drillon, etc. This was never about making him out to be a defensive wiz or stalwart, rather getting him out of the basement and up to say an average value. He'll put in the work, be responsible but won't be a game breaker on defense, etc.
How much the needle moves is up to the individual. Honestly there are some I don't think will change their minds at all, regardless of how thorough I am and how much material I have dug up. That's just the nature of people being people (unique). And most of this was done because I like a challenge and really love the research aspect. Of course a portion of the pie is about making the player's value increase, helping my cause during voting, but it's a small portion in all honestly.
I'd say about 90% of my digging is done on Stewart. I've got to get everything into an actual bio form so that it's easier to digest and that will take some time but there should be no problem having it all done before the draft is over.