Dishing the Dirt

A couple comments on the above:

- the description of Riga playing an NHL-style offense in 1976 is extremely interesting given who the Riga coach was at the time. It is also an interesting, if indirect, comment on Helmut Balderis' game.

- the information about how Maltsev had gained weight/become lazy and was criticized for it in the Soviet press is also quite interesting. I had wondered before about the strange down period in the middle of Maltsev's career, and we now have a better picture of what was going on.

- some of the banter is pretty funny. I particularly like: "Bobby Clarke's team does not play friendlies with anyone."
 
A couple comments on the above:

- the description of Riga playing an NHL-style offense in 1976 is extremely interesting given who the Riga coach was at the time. It is also an interesting, if indirect, comment on Helmut Balderis' game.

- the information about how Maltsev had gained weight/become lazy and was criticized for it in the Soviet press is also quite interesting. I had wondered before about the strange down period in the middle of Maltsev's career, and we now have a better picture of what was going on.

- some of the banter is pretty funny. I particularly like: "Bobby Clarke's team does not play friendlies with anyone."
The USSR may have started influencing the NHL in 76, but I don't know if the opposite had started yet.

That is a funny quote about Clarke. Maybe conditioning and fitness help explains Maltsev's 0 goals in the 72 Summit Series four years earlier. Some posters here assume if Clarke hadn't taken out Kharlamov, the Series would have gone differently. We just don't know that. If Maltsev had played better, if Paul Henderson hadn't scored 7 goals, if Orr and/or Hull had played, and others factors could have had more impact than Kharlamov's injury. We just don't know.
 
The USSR may have started influencing the NHL in 76, but I don't know if the opposite had started yet.

In the article, Kulagin states in plain terms that the north american style had begun influencing Soviet hockey by that time. I'm not sure exactly what you're doubting here, nor why.
 
In the article, Kulagin states in plain terms that the north american style had begun influencing Soviet hockey by that time. I'm not sure exactly what you're doubting here, nor why.

...Except for Riga Dynamo, the major teams concentrate on short, crisp passes to move the puck up the ice; then, once in the attacking end, they work what might be called perimeter pick plays, trying to isolate a man for one good shot at the goal. In essence, four players simply move the puck around while the fifth attempts to clear the route for that one good shot by picking some defenseman and removing him from the play. In the NHL , pick plays are called interference and earn the picking player two minutes in the penalty box. Riga Dynamo, the exception, plays the Westernized way, stationing its centers Phil Esposito -style in the slot and trying to work the puck directly to them for quick shots at the goal. Riga also is the only Soviet league team with the names of its players sewn on the backs of their jerseys.

Defensively, all Soviet teams ignore the standard pro tactics of forechecking and backchecking. The idea of defense never seems to enter a play until the puck-carrying team has crossed the red line. Also, Soviet players never invade the corners in search-and-destroy missions for the puck. In fact, the referees are instructed to whistle play to a halt rather than let two players jostle for the puck against the boards. ...
It sounds pretty minimal.
 
It sounds pretty minimal.

In another section, Kulagin also talks about how the league has gotten rougher since 1972. The experience of north American hockey had clearly begun to take hold. It just appears that Tikhonov in Riga was the first coach to implement a north American system.

"Violence, Boris. Have there been any outbreaks of violence in your league?"

"It has been terrible. Since that 1972 series against Team Canada we have played more dirty in every game. The professional influence is hurting us. Sometimes we even have fights."
 
I recently found some information on Cyclone Taylor that I don't think had been uncovered before. Some of us, including myself, have expressed certain doubts about Taylor's all-around game (specifically defense) due to a lack of primary sources which mention anything other than his dazzling offensive play. I had been curious about his all-around play and about the reasons for the games he missed in the PCHA, as I had never heard of his suffering any injury. Here is a bit on Taylor's all-around game:

9.3.1918 - Spokane Daily Chronicle:

"Cyclone" is far ahead of his nearest rival in scoring honors and will probably maintain an edge through the final series next week.

Taylor's defensive play was also exceptionally strong.

11.1.1913 - Ottawa Citizen:

Taylor was always in the limelight, and his clashes with Johnson, the star defenseman of the cup holders, were one of the most interesting features of the evening.

The [unreadable] an attack of appendicitis and under the care of a physician earlier in the evening, Taylor went on the ice and played one of his spectacular games, although the "Cyclone" was not taking any great chances in view of his condition. His skating and stickhandling, in fact, all-around playing, has become a feature in every match in which he participates.

11.11.1908 - The Pittsburgh Press:

He was counted a wonder before he went into those games, but still more so after they were over, and at the conclusion of the season was voted unanimously as the best all-around player in that league which contained many experts.

And finally, another mention of Taylor's appendicitis.

3.1.1917 - The Spokane Daily Chronicle:

Fred (Cyclone) Taylor, the star of the Vancouver hockey team who was operated on for appendicitis recently, is on the speedy road to recovery and may get back into a game again before the close of the present season. Taylor underwent his operation on December 11 and was discharged from the hospital December 22.

------------------------------------------------------

So it looks like Taylor suffered from some unusual form of long-term chronic appendicitis (a bit like Harry Houdini?) which eventually was operated on late in 1916, causing him to miss basically the entire season.

He does seem to have been a good two-way or "all-around" player, though his defensive efforts were clearly overshadowed by his offensive prowess. Single sources are of questionable value, but there are a few corroborating points of evidence here about Taylor's two-way play, and contemporary quotes like "exceptionally strong" carry a good deal of weight.

I think this is probably enough to move the needle on our perception of Taylor a bit. I am now quite uncertain as to who I would choose between he and Nighbor as the greatest player of the pre-Morenz era.
 
Didnt we already basically know that Cyclone was probably decent defensively? It was in a few books, right? Good to see primary source confirmation though.

As far as I'm concerned, the case for Nighbor over Taylor has always been that Nighbor's teams were better with him on the ice and worse with him off it
 
Last edited:
Found something interesting last night while looking for something else. It is a description of the 1920-21 Ottawa Senators in a Vancouver paper on the eve of the opening game of the Stanley Cup finals. Most of it is well-known stuff, except for this part:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=ifIdVpG6JtcC&dat=19210320&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

The Vancouver Sun - 20.3.1921 (page 11):

Denneny, the left wing, is the second best scorer in the NHL. He is a fast skater and travels with reckless abandon in a rush.

With more speed than Skinner Poulin, he resembles that old Coast veteran more than any other player not in this league. He never lets up and worries the life out of an opposing check.

This is the first primary source document I've ever seen which describes Denneny as a plus skater, so that detail, alone, is quite interesting. Now, the document also contains at least one small error: George Boucher is described as a "Frenchman" in spite of the fact that the Boucher brothers were much more Irish than French (their paternal grandfather was Quebecois), and even spoke with something of a brogue.

At any rate, it is interesting information. I only wish that jarek were still around. He'd need to take a shower after reading the above.
 
Does anyone know if a Globe and Mail NHL Players poll from 1942 has been uncovered before?

I came across it yesterday.. it says that it is the first poll of the players done apparently..
 
Does anyone know if a Globe and Mail NHL Players poll from 1942 has been uncovered before?

I came across it yesterday.. it says that it is the first poll of the players done apparently..

This line is in my Jack Crawford profile: "Overpass found during the defenseman project that the players did a poll and chose Crawford a 2nd Team AS in 1941-42."

It's been uncovered, but I don't think it's ever been posted in full on this board.
 
I've been following overpass's lead recently and searching the Sports Illustrated archives. It's a great resource going back to the mid 1950s or so.

I found a fantastic article from March 19, 1956, as close to we have as a snapshot in time from the change in power from the Red Wings dynasty to the Canadiens dynasty. It is entitled The Year the Red Wings Lost the Pennant

Background: In the Original 6 era, winning the regular season title was very prestigious, not nearly as far removed from winning the Cup as it is today. Teams played a balanced schedule, playing every other team 14 times. If you ever see an old source talk about a team winning the "NHL championship," they are usually talking about the regular season title. The Stanley Cup champion is usually referred to as the "Cup champion" or something of the sort.

From 1948-49 to 1954-55, the Red Wings won 7 straight "NHL championships" (also called Pennants) before being dethroned by Montreal in 1955-56. The Wings would win again in 1956-57 (though Montreal would take the Cup), then Montreal would reel off 5 straight Pennants of their own.

This article is from 1955-56, right as the Canadiens look poised to finally dethrone Detroit for the NHL (regular season) championship. It notes that Montreal looked poised to do the deed in 1954-55 before L'Affaire Richard (the Rocket's famous suspension). Lots of good stuff about several prominent ATD players as they were perceived late in the 1955-56 season:

Even taking into account the continued greatness of Richard, Gordon Howe and Red Kelly, Beliveau is doubtless the finest all-round player in the game today and is beginning to emerge as a performer who can do more things and do them better than any other center in the full history of hockey.

That short quote says a lot about two players - Jean Beliveau and Red Kelly.

Beliveau: As early as 1956, he was already being talked about as the best player in the league and possibly the best center of all-time

Kelly: Once again, we see Kelly mentioned in the same breath as Richard and Howe. In 1953-54, Kelly was voted the "Player of the Year" by the press and Boston's coach called him the best player in the league, even better than Richard or Howe. But here we have evidence that 2 years later, Kelly was still spoken of in the same class as Richard and Howe, as the best of the older players.

Here's a bit a strong praise for Bert Olmstead's work as the "glue" on the Beliveau line and a heaping amount of praise for Doug Harvey:

Nonetheless, despite the unquestioned contribution of Montreal's big scoring guns and of Bert (Old Elbows) Olmstead—that relentless puck-digger who has been almost as instrumental as Beliveau in making their line with Geoffrion the outstanding forward combination in the league—perhaps the least dispensable member of the team is the veteran defenseman, Doug Harvey.

Besides doing all the unglamorous, seldom-noticed chores that a good defenseman must perform, Harvey knows how to mount a play and the way he does so is perfect for the Canadiens' style of attack. Doug is not one of those weaving rink-length rushers, but no one loses less time starting a counterattack after breaking up a play and no one capitalizes more astutely on a jump. He is up to the other team's blue line in a twinkle, taking in the situation as he mushes forward, looking for his forwards and then, with a solid sense of maneuver, promoting a strong play by feeding the right man the right pass. He is wonderfully adroit also in handling his post at the points (just inside the blue line) on the famed Montreal power play, which does its stuff when the opposing team has a man in the penalty box. (With Geoffrion coming on at the other point and with Olmstead, Beliveau and Maurice Richard usually working up front in games through March 3 Montreal scored no less than 49 of its total 193 goals when enjoying a one-man advantage.)

All in all, Harvey is as complete a defenseman as there is. While you think you appreciate his value when you watch him, you really do not until he is out of the lineup with an injury. Then the Canadiens, star-studded as they are, have trouble getting the puck out of their own territory and the forward lines begin to skate, and over-skate, with much less purpose. Les Canadiens have experienced only one protracted slump this season, and it is more than coincidence that this drop in play began at about the same time Harvey was forced out with an injury in late December and that they began to find their touch again shortly after he returned to duty.

Constrasting Red Kelly's style with Doug Harvey's. Also a description of the "Kelly on LW" experiment that probably cost him the 1st Team All Star on D that season. Note that Harvey and Kelly are considered "in a class of their own" among defensemen:

For several seasons now Harvey and Red Kelly of Detroit have been in a class of their own, a discernible cut above the other defensemen in the league. Kelly's style of play, of course, has always been an individual one. A marvelous, tireless skater, he has the energy and the speed and the maneuverability to serve not only as a stout defender but to double as a virtually cohesive part of the offense. This season " Detroit's fourth forward," as Kelly has been called for some time, was actually pressed into service as a forward. Jimmy Skinner, the Wings coach, made the move early in December, after his team had managed to win only 6 of its first 25 games and it seemed they might never get rolling. Skinner's second and third lines had not been producing at all, and he recognized that his first tactical adjustment—using his powerful first line of Howe, Reibel and Lindsay as often as they could climb over the boards—hadn't been getting him anyplace. Overwork was diminishing the H-R-L line's punch, and lack of work wasn't helping the confidence of his newly formed third line and the sluggishness of his second line. The defense had been functioning well, though. Pronovost had been playing fine hockey, Godfrey was doing all right, old Bob Goldham—he entered the NHL way back in 1941 with Toronto (can you believe it?)—was still getting around O.K.; furthermore, Larry Hillman, a very promising defenseman, could be recalled from the minors. So Skinner made his move. He switched Kelly to left wing on his first line and sent Lindsay down to juice up the second. It was a daring bit of juggling, and it worked. Almost overnight the Wings began to win at their customary clip, and until they dropped five out of those six points in that head-on series with Montreal, it looked as if they might be on their way to recapturing all of their old grinding efficiency.

As for Kelly, he was a revelation on left wing. He remained at that position for 26 games, until Pronovost was hurt and he had to be sent back to bolster the defense. Over that stretch Red scored 11 goals and assisted in 13 others, but these statistics barely intimate what an enormous amount of wing he played. One picture or, more accurately, one series of pictures remains clearly in my mind. It is Kelly back-checking with that effortless finesse of his, breaking up one enemy rush after another before they could even get started and generally creating the impression that progress up his side of the rink was virtually impossible, a road temporarily closed to traffic.

The article goes on to credit coaching for the Rangers making the playoffs for the first time in forever, criticizes Boston's lack of on-ice leadership, and talks about Chicago's lack of talent. Toronto "gambled everything on developing their latest passel of rookies but as usual gambled nothing at all tactically, persevering with their patented sit-on-one-goal brand of play."
 
This line is in my Jack Crawford profile: "Overpass found during the defenseman project that the players did a poll and chose Crawford a 2nd Team AS in 1941-42."

It's been uncovered, but I don't think it's ever been posted in full on this board.

I would think that research and education that we are doing here would qualify for fair dealing as far as copyright (posted all over the damn thing) goes so I'll summarize:


Globe and Mail Mar 21, 1942

100 NHL Players polled

FIRST TEAM

GOAL: Frank Brimsek, D: Earl Siebert & Tommy Anderson
CENTER: Syl Apps, RW: Bryan Hextall, LW: Lynn Patrick

SECOND TEAM

GOAL: Walter Broda, D: Dit Clapper & Johnny Crawford
CENTER: Phil Watson, RW: Bobby Bauer, LW: Syd Abel

HONORABLE MENTION

GOAL: Charley Rayner, D: Ott Heller & Pat Egan (tied for third choice), Jack Stewart, Babe Pratt, Bingo Kampman, Flash Hollett.

CENTER: Milt Schmidt, Don Gosso RW: Gord Drillon, Bill Thoms LW: Red Hamill


According to the article, the first teamers had a substantial margin on the second team in voting. Brimsek, Hextall and Patrick with 71 first team votes and then Apps with 50 "to shake off the school of hockey obsevation that favoured Milt Schmidt and Phil Watson." (pumping my guy!)

Seibert was also far ahead of Anderson.

As you'd expect, after some of the second team guys the voting started to get scattered around.
 
So I think I finally have a lead on the legendary managers' all-star teams of the pre-war era.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...WodJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9AsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3281,664771

Apparently Jim Hendy, a statistician at the time, produced a publication called "The Hockey Guide" every year from 1933 to 1951. The managers' all-star teams were apparently part of this guide. I have done some Google querying, and cannot find any more of these documents, but I know where we can find a mostly full collection:

http://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/collections/sports/ice_hockey/annuals-hendy.shtml

Does anybody live close to Notre Dame, Indiana?
 
So I think I finally have a lead on the legendary managers' all-star teams of the pre-war era.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...WodJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9AsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3281,664771

Apparently Jim Hendy, a statistician at the time, produced a publication called "The Hockey Guide" every year from 1933 to 1951. The managers' all-star teams were apparently part of this guide. I have done some Google querying, and cannot find any more of these documents, but I know where we can find a mostly full collection:

http://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/collections/sports/ice_hockey/annuals-hendy.shtml

Does anybody live close to Notre Dame, Indiana?

A few states away but i do have a friend from my military days who lives out that way. I can shoot him a message on facebook and see if he might be willing to help me out with that book you listed.
 
So I think I finally have a lead on the legendary managers' all-star teams of the pre-war era.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...WodJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9AsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3281,664771

Apparently Jim Hendy, a statistician at the time, produced a publication called "The Hockey Guide" every year from 1933 to 1951. The managers' all-star teams were apparently part of this guide. I have done some Google querying, and cannot find any more of these documents, but I know where we can find a mostly full collection:

http://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/collections/sports/ice_hockey/annuals-hendy.shtml

Does anybody live close to Notre Dame, Indiana?

Might be worth posting in this thread: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1601949
 
So I think I finally have a lead on the legendary managers' all-star teams of the pre-war era.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...WodJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9AsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3281,664771

Apparently Jim Hendy, a statistician at the time, produced a publication called "The Hockey Guide" every year from 1933 to 1951. The managers' all-star teams were apparently part of this guide. I have done some Google querying, and cannot find any more of these documents, but I know where we can find a mostly full collection:

http://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/collections/sports/ice_hockey/annuals-hendy.shtml

Does anybody live close to Notre Dame, Indiana?

I can see if I can get them on an interlibrary loan. I'm not sure how possible it would be because it appears that you'd have to go there. That may become a summer road trip for me, then.
 
So I think I finally have a lead on the legendary managers' all-star teams of the pre-war era.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...WodJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9AsNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3281,664771

Apparently Jim Hendy, a statistician at the time, produced a publication called "The Hockey Guide" every year from 1933 to 1951. The managers' all-star teams were apparently part of this guide. I have done some Google querying, and cannot find any more of these documents, but I know where we can find a mostly full collection:

http://rarebooks.library.nd.edu/collections/sports/ice_hockey/annuals-hendy.shtml

Does anybody live close to Notre Dame, Indiana?

I discovered those recently too and confused myself into thinking they were posted in the award thread already.

Here's 1944
 
In searching for info on Frank Foyston's MVP season, I found some interesting stuff on the award itself. It was not an "MVP", but rather an award for "Champion, All-Around Player."

It was created in 1917, and awarded to Frank Foyston.

In 1918, Cyclone Taylor won the award.

In 1919, Frank Patrick banned the trophy and it was no longer awarded.


Suorce:
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/take2...ttles-forgotten-pro-superstar-frank-foylston/
 
That's really interesting, Dreak. I guess we know now why the only information we've ever uncovered on PCHA MVPs pertains to the ones that were given to Foyston and Taylor. It's at least good to know that we can stop looking for more.
 
Some new unofficial early All Star teams have been posted on HOH.

PCHA referees Mickey Ion and George Irvine selected their All-Stars after 1917-1918

The Toronto World - Mar 9, 1918
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=zbw6AAAAIBAJ&sjid=NSoMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1566%2C11811420

Other random old All-Stars selections.

Ottawa Free Press selected ECHA All-Star team. There were still games left to play on that season. Published in Daily Telegraph and only the team is listed.
The Daily Telegraph - Feb 21, 1908
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1905&dat=19080221&id=05EfAAAAIBAJ&sjid=5dMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2278,5600954

Ottawa Citizen writer speculates with the idea of East vs. West All-Star game in 1907.
Ottawa Citizen - Mar 22, 1907
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2194&dat=19070322&id=ukIuAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yNgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3537,1044007

Montreal Daily Mail readers could sent their All-Star selection and results were compiled here. Jack Darragh did better than Ovechkin.
The Montreal Daily Mail - Mar 4, 1914
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rKkjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JEEDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3215%2C193676

Some great links here, thanks for researching and posting!

The Daily Mail's team in 1914 (32 voters):

Goal: Georges Vezina (21 votes)
Point: Harry Cameron (12 votes at point, 5 at cover point)
Cover point: Sprague Cleghorn (10 votes at cover point, 6 votes at point)
Centre: Newsy Lalonde (11 votes at C, 2 votes at RW, 1 vote at LW)
Left wing: Jack Darragh (12 votes at LW, 10 votes at RW, 1 vote at C)
Right wing: Jack Walker (6 votes at RW, 10 votes at LW, 1 vote at C)

More evidence for Vezina's greatness.

A little bit of meat for the resumes of Cameron, Darragh, and Walker
 
Some new unofficial early All Star teams have been posted on HOH.

More evidence for Vezina's greatness.

A little bit of meat for the resumes of Cameron, Darragh, and Walker

Good finds TDMM.

Alf Smith was named to both teams in 1907 and 1908. That's a good boost for him I think.

Also, the number of votes Jack Walker received in 1914 was quite impressive.
 
So I've been doing some more research on one of my old favorites, Frank Brimsek. There were still at least two holes to fill with regards to his career, regarding how he played stylistically, and his playoff performances at the end of his career, of which we knew almost nothing. I've found a fair amount of rich material regarding Brimsek, which I suppose shouldn't be surprising as he was perhaps the first true superstar goalie. There was simply a lot written about the man.

Note: I have stumbled upon a technique for running Google Archives queries which I've found highly effective. Simply put a player's name with the name of a prominent coach of his era into your query, and you've got a decent chance of finding a document in which that coach gives his opinion on the player in question. This probably only really works for stars, but it has proven of some value to me in sifting through all of the old Brimsek documents.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stylistic:

20.1.1939 - The Montreal Gazette:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...4sjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=kJgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5838,3247303

The Chatter-Box:

Take it from Art Ross and Cooney Weiland, who direct the operations of the pace-setting Boston Bruins, that Frankie Brimsek has the "most amazing powers of concentration" of any goaler they ever saw...That quality, they contend, is the basic one on which his success is founded...Linked to this is cat-like speed and a great pair of hands to complete the picture of "the best goaler in the league right now," according to Ross...To demonstrate just how deeply Brimsek concentrates on his work, Ross points out that Frankie has made some 15 or 20 saves, of deflected shots, hardest for a goaler to get to, since he joined the Bruins...In other words, he never removes his eyes from the puck and nothing can distract his attention...His quickness of movement does the rest...To aid his speed, Brimsek wears the lightest possible equipment...Ross relates that Frankie, in ordering his pads, specified, "Make 'em light. Never mind the bruises I'll get. I don't mind 'em"...Not a very communicative person at any time, Brimsek is a sphinx in the dressing room...He does not allow his concentration on a game to be interrupted during the rest intervals, for then he sits as if in a trance, looking down at the floor, and saying nothing...This fits right in with Ross's scheme of things, for he prefers his men to maintain a tranquil quiet in the dressing room between periods as a nerve-soothing medium to counteract the hurly-burly of the action on the ice.

13.2.1942 - The Montreal Gazette:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...r8tAAAAIBAJ&sjid=QZkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6770,2209426

Brimsek an All-Time Goaltending Great

In his day, Happy Day has seen a lot of goaltenders, and played with and against most of those he saw. Included in the group were such past masters of the art as Georges Vezina, Clint Benedict, Alex Connell, Hughie Lehman, George Hainsworth, Roy Worters, Chuck Gardiner and Cecil "Tiny" Thompson. Yet the best netminder Hap Day ever laid eyes on was not one of these. The best goaler the Toronto coach and former defense star ever saw was Boston's Frank Brimsek.

Day has a pretty sweet netminder of his own in Turk Broda and a great admiration for him, but when it comes down to brass tacks and all sentiment aside, Hap plumps for Brimsek as the best in the league today - and the best he ever saw.

"That Brimsek belongs among the all-time great goalkeepers: no questions about that," said Day, "and don't forget playing goal nowadays is a lot more difficult than it used to be."

Happy says one reason he thinks so highly of Frigid Frank is because he has never, never seen Brimsek play a bad game, and he usually sees him against Toronto. Day goes on, "He's practically unbeatable against us any time; and it was he who stopped us in the playoffs last spring no question about it. I said I never saw him play a bad game, and that goes for the playoff game we beat Boston 7-2. Brimsek was still phenomenal. We'd have had 15 goals that night but for him."

Day knows, though he rarely sees Brimsek in action against other clubs, that Frank seldom if ever plays a bad game against anybody.

Two Hallmarks of His Work

There are two points that impress Day particularly about Brimsek; one is that he always seems to be in position, waiting for the puck - like a top-notch outfielder in baseball, the kind who never has to make spectacular catches because he is always there ahead of the ball - and because of the shots Frank stops with his hand; shots that whip goalward four of five inches off the ice to the corner; shots that beat other netminders, but shots that Brimsek picks off with that hand of his.

Happy says, "You know, for quite a while, I kept telling my boys, 'You're always shooting right at Brimsek. Put that puck where he isn't.' But the more I see of him, the more I realize that there isn't anywhere around the nets that Brimsek isn't. I mean the fellows always seem to be shooting at him, because he always gets in front of the puck. He must have all the angles figured to a tee, and probably all the habits of the men who shoot at him, too. He anticipates where the shots are going to go. It's not often you see Brimsek making that last sensational, hair's-breadth save, like a lot of goalers have to do. He is there waiting for it ahead of time."

...

In this new game of heavy pressure and constant attack, it's a lot tougher on a goalkeeper than in the good old days, says Day. "You don't see goalies standing around, taking it easy now," Hap declares, "they have to be more active; they have to watch for pucks coming at them out of a forest of figures; often they have to make their moves instinctively on screened and deflected shots. And despite all those handicaps, Brimsek is the best I've ever seen."

Day adds that if you don't believe him you should talk to Gordie Drillon about Brimsek. Drillon - a pretty fair hockey player himself who averages about 40 scoring points a year for Toronto, including some 25 goals which win a lot of hockey games for the Leafs - played amateur with Brimsek in Pittsburgh, and even then Gordie had him tabbed as a coming great. When Drillon first went to Toronto, he told the Leafs then of this Brimsek. Drillon was sold on Brimsek that far back. And to show you just how serious Frigid Frank was about his work from the very beginning, big Gordie relates that scoring a goal on him in practice was like cutting Brimsek's heart out.

27.3.1942 - Ottawa Citizen:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...PcuAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vtsFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3515,5075412

Reports credit Brimsek with playing a sensational game but that much can be taken in stride. Any time Brimsek fails to come up with a sparkling effort the Bruins are going nowhere. He is the best goaler in the pro circuit these days and the main reason the critics hate to dismiss the Krautless Bruins.

4.4.1946 - The Maple Leaf:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...c6AAAAIBAJ&sjid=SyoMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2932,25427575

Frigid Frankie Brimsek played his usual cool and brilliant game, and time and time again broke up goal-labelled thrusts. Frankie was immense despite his team's loss.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments: the long article in which Day raves about Brimsek is pretty interesting. The moniker "Frigid Frank" pops up with a good deal of frequency when one reads about Brimsek, as do references to his consistency. All of this seems to paint a picture of a player who was highly focused, both in practice and in games, extremely consistent and unflappable. The descriptions of Brimsek's great concentration on deflected shots, his seriousness in practice, and his silent, focused demeanor in the locker room add to this image.

The descriptions of Brimsek's great quickness were already well-known, I think, but the rest of this is new information to me.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad