Did Gaborik have HOF talent?

May 2, 2005
1,639
881
Niagara Falls
Fantastic career. Led the Kings in goals in the year he won the cup. 400 career goals. Playing much of his prime in a system that did not promote offence as much as other teams.

Theoretically if he had played on a different team and avoided the hip and back surgeries - he definitely had the talent to score HOF numbers.

Now Bondra on the other hand should be in the HOF. 500 goals, led the league in scoring two years. Fantastic international career for Slovakia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,322
15,058
Did Kevin Lowe have Hall of Fame talent?
Some guys in the HHOF have very little talent, especially when compared to Gaborik. Mogilny isn’t in the Hall. Lowe is. Go figure?
 

BelovedIsles

Registered User
Oct 22, 2005
20,779
5,963
Glad Ziggy is getting some shoutouts (my all-time favorite hockey player). Both electrifying players; admittedly Gaborik had more pure talent with his speed.
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,542
19,173
He was a monster against the Ducks in 2014 Playoffs. Great player, wouldn't put him in the HHOF but he's in the Hall of Very Good.
 

SirPaste

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
14,540
732
STL
All those years stuck on a crappy Wild team hurt his numbers, and didn't really start playing for good teams until after his prime so its a good question. I am not sure if he would have put up HOF numbers on a better team playing a more offensive game but he was one hell of a player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Saga of the Elk

Honoured Person
May 31, 2008
3,257
1,069
Similar to Taylor Hall in a way... great set of skills but played for teams that didn't really provide the best support and ultimately their bodies let them down. If things had broken differently... I mean we're discussing guys like Nick Backstrom for the HOF... perfect example of an elite teammate making the case for them. However, HOF does measure things like durability and longevity, perhaps puts too much emphasis on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figgy44

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,554
8,847
In his best season, he peaked at 10th in points and 5th in goals as a 27 year old.

He only has a single top 10 point finish and 3 top goal finishes (3, 5, 7)

He was never really a true contender for any major awards. Even his 3rd place goalscoring finish, he is 9 goals behind Malkin and 19 behind Stamkos.

You could argue a healthy Gaborik has more top 10 goal finishes, and maybe point finishes. But at best that makes him a very borderline case. I think realistically he would just be in a higher tier of "hall of very good" players.

Players like Theo Fleury, Zigmund Palffy, Markus Naslund, John Leclair all have better top 10 stat finishes, and none of them are in the HHOF.

All sorts of players are in the hall of very good/borderline HHOF if they were perfectly healthy or significantly healthier than their actual career. Gaborik is no exception. I also think this is also especially true for players that play with a specific type of recklessness. Someone reckless and rarely injured is kinda scary.
 

Ghost of Murph

Registered User
Dec 23, 2023
955
1,629
Great player who was hella fun to watch play. Just can't see him getting in the HHOF, though. Had his health and teams he played for been different, the talent was there to have a HHOF career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

BigKing

Blake Out of Hell III: Back in to Hell
Mar 11, 2003
11,633
12,535
Belmont Shore, CA
google.com
Answer to OP's question is obviously "yes", but talent was never the question.

He is an LA Kings legend though for 2014 alone.

Pretty sure his nickname was Ferrari. Perfect for him. You're going to get insane performance but not a daily driver and you can't take it to Costco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Beukeboom Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
16,069
1,996
Chicago, IL
Visit site
Eh, maybe? "Talent" is so vague. Rob Schremp could've had a HHOF talent.
Strongly disagree, unless hockey turns into a dangling trick shot competition. IMO Gaborik was as dominant a player as any in his prime.

People seem to forget how low scoring the DPE was, and MINN was the poster child for the DPE. If you replaced Bure on the Panthers with healthy Gaborik how much fall of do you have?

Top 3 fairly recent players I would have loved to see what they could have done if healthy: Gaborik, Havlat, Stamkos
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figgy44

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,554
8,847
Strongly disagree, unless hockey turns into a dangling trick shot competition. IMO Gaborik was as dominant a player as any in his prime.

People seem to forget how low scoring the DPE was, and MINN was the poster child for the DPE. If you replaced Bure on the Panthers with healthy Gaborik how much fall of do you have?

Top 3 fairly recent players I would have loved to see what they could have done if healthy: Gaborik, Havlat, Stamkos

Agreed, Gaborik actually showed he had everything necessary to be one of the best to play the game with the exception of health. That meant he wasn't always capable of doing exactly what he wanted to do on the ice (but still did a lot) and wasn't always on the ice to do more of what he was doing (IR).

I think it's valid to say he's borderline if he had health but the teams don't change. I think it's valid to say it's a little more than borderline if he had health AND played more on different teams that would showcase his skills better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

raswilliam

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
888
1,149
CA. refugee<E. TN.
no.

Here is some of my criteria

1) 50 goal seasons? No
2) 100 pts seasons? Non
3) 500 goals/1000pts? No
4) Any hardware? No

While he won the cup with LA--he was brought in at the 11th hour to join the team.

For me he is the hall of very good.
he was absolute $ in the 2014 playoff. 14 goals in 26 games. Especially round 2 against the ducks
 

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
7,040
460
nearest bar MN
if he would have been surrounded by more / better talent then probably. mgmt only cared about money rather than putting the best product on ice. atleast our current mgmt is willing to spend to the cap.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad