This was my initial takeaway but might be a mistake to anchor to what these guys are right now. I mean Kakko is a prime example of a supposedly mature player being a step behind at the next level because what creates separation is not the same at the NHL level.Slafkovsky would be a terrible pick. He is Kakko 2.0 – looks great on ice but can't produce.
Jiricek has good tape, shifty and dynamic with the puck but I question his judgement and overall IQ. He looks like a headless rooster on skates out there.
Nemec is the safer pick. Steady at home defenseman with plenty of offensive skills.
He is the only one of the three that is a consensus top 5 prospect and his IQ and understanding of the game seems superior to that of Jiricek.
Slafkovsky would be a terrible pick. He is Kakko 2.0 – looks great on ice but can't produce.
Jiricek has good tape, shifty and dynamic with the puck but I question his judgement and overall IQ. He looks like a headless rooster on skates out there.
Nemec is the safer pick. Steady at home defenseman with plenty of offensive skills.
He is the only one of the three that is a consensus top 5 prospect and his IQ and understanding of the game seems superior to that of Jiricek.
Can we also sign Bjorninen so we have a player named Bjorninen on our team because it's fun to say BjorninenSlafkovsky has size which we need but most importantly he has SLICK HANDS!View attachment 544230
NJ doesn't need more prospects, they need the best ones. Their system is flooded with quality prospects.I voted trade down, but only if it includes a top 5 draft pick. I want either of the 2 Defenders and additional assets. Something like Arizona 3rd and late 1sts or Seattles 4th and 2nd round picks. If they don't bite, keep the pick and draft BPA.
NJ doesn't need more prospects, they need the best ones. Their system is flooded with quality prospects.
If I had a shot at 18 year old Rantanen, I would be jumping at the chance. The great thing about this pick is that NJ doesn't need it to pan out to be Cup Contenders. I go highest ceiling.
Five years from now, people who thought trading the Devils 2022 #2 overall pick for *Kevin Fiala* will be denying they ever made such an utterly absurd suggestion.Or Fiala?
If I had a shot at 18 year old Rantanen, I would be jumping at the chance. The great thing about this pick is that NJ doesn't need it to pan out to be Cup Contenders. I go highest ceiling.
To be fair, that was before we won the lottery.Five years from now, people who thought trading the Devils 2022 #2 overall pick for *Kevin Fiala* will be denying they ever made such an utterly absurd suggestion.
This is a very myopic post, and I'm not trying to insult you, I'm only trying to make sure any younger fans who may believe there is any truth whatsoever in this post are not swayed to make such a mistake.Slafkovsky would be a terrible pick. He is Kakko 2.0 – looks great on ice but can't produce.
Jiricek has good tape, shifty and dynamic with the puck but I question his judgement and overall IQ. He looks like a headless rooster on skates out there.
Nemec is the safer pick. Steady at home defenseman with plenty of offensive skills.
He is the only one of the three that is a consensus top 5 prospect and his IQ and understanding of the game seems superior to that of Jiricek.
My top 5 for "ceiling" in the 2022 draft -- in no order because I don't feel like picking it apart right now -- would be Wright, Slafkovsky, Jiricek, Miroshnichenko and LambertWho has the highest ceiling?
I mean there’s a very significant chance Fiala is a better a player than most of the players being discussed here. Do we think Slafkovsky is topping 33 goals and 85 points by age 25? Yes, interior this, interior that, but Fiala is a stud.Five years from now, people who thought trading the Devils 2022 #2 overall pick for *Kevin Fiala* will be denying they ever made such an utterly absurd suggestion.
That really is not a good way to look at. In a cap world you have to factor in what % of cap a player will be taking up. Also, scoring was way up this year. I mean, Chris Kreider scored 52 goals this year. I doubt Slaf will ever score 52 goals but I would not trade the pick for Kreider if he was turning 26 this summerI mean there’s a very significant chance Fiala is a better a player than most of the players being discussed here. Do we think Slafkovsky is topping 33 goals and 85 points by age 25? Yes, interior this, interior that, but Fiala is a stud.
Yes, if Slafkovsky hits close to his ceiling he will score more than Fiala while also offering an interior presence and thus improving the play of the forwards he skates alongside in ways Fiala is not capable of.I mean there’s a very significant chance Fiala is a better a player than most of the players being discussed here. Do we think Slafkovsky is topping 33 goals and 85 points by age 25? Yes, interior this, interior that, but Fiala is a stud.
If slaf is all cracked up to be he’s probably scoring in the 60 point range by year 3 on an elc as opposed to fiala who will prob command 8 mil plus. I think fiala was a realistic option at trading our original pick but winning the lottery has probably changed thatI mean there’s a very significant chance Fiala is a better a player than most of the players being discussed here. Do we think Slafkovsky is topping 33 goals and 85 points by age 25? Yes, interior this, interior that, but Fiala is a stud.