Devils731
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2008
- 12,939
- 18,383
Juraj looks like he could play the bad guy prep in a caddyshack or animal house continuation.
I'm a big fan of Pronman -- great analyst, great writer. I wish his rankings would just have the player listed and a blurb describing why. Everything else is just noise, like pop-ups you have to ignore on a website. His skill ratings for players always come off wrong, and these new comparables are not only even worse but setting him up for a ton of flak which devalues how good he is at draft analysis.I have no idea why Pronman would add another meaningless thing for people to over-analyse when they already don't get why he ranks someone with a bunch of "NHL Average" qualities above someone with "Above NHL Average." Feels like he's setting himself up on that one.
I do love his rankings over just about everyone else in the biz, mostly because he is typically more realistic with projections than the overhype you get so often with these things.
I'd have no problem with that. Having 3 elite centers might bring us with the best depth in the game. I want Slaf, but Wright isn't far behind for me if Montreal wants to get cute.
It's too bad they never rolled with it, but Quebec had young versions of Sakic, Sundin, and Forsberg in the system. Unfortunately they had trouble signing Forsberg and once they did they decided to trade one of their centers for a gritty winger. Allegedly they offered Sakic to Vancouver for Trevor Linden but they were fresh off nearly winning the Cup and it would have been tough to trade their captain. Then they end up trading Sundin for Wendel Clark+.
Quebec had a young Mike Ricci back then too and he was a former top 5 pick who was a point per game guy at 21. But his offense dissipated pretty quickly after Forsberg arrived.
On paper, 2001-02 Dallas had Mike Modano, Joe Nieuwendyk, and Pierre Turgeon but that ended up being a weird mix.
I'm a big fan of Pronman -- great analyst, great writer. I wish his rankings would just have the player listed and a blurb describing why. Everything else is just noise, like pop-ups you have to ignore on a website. His skill ratings for players always come off wrong, and these new comparables are not only even worse but setting him up for a ton of flak which devalues how good he is at draft analysis.
Didn't Colorado have Sakic, Forsburg, Drury down the middle? Drury is not quite elite, but was a first line caliber center.
We'll see what Scott Wheeler does haha.Didn't Colorado have Sakic, Forsburg, Drury down the middle? Drury is not quite elite, but was a first line caliber center.
I think the comparables are there to drive traffic to the site. A sad concession to market pressure.
Wright is better offensively than Nico was at his age. The offensive upside is higher imo.Isn’t Nico hischier a good comparison for wright?
In the sense that he's probably not going to be a "generational" 1OA yes. I loathe the term generational and people need to realize that just bc it's the first pick that doesn't mean they're getting some future hall of Famer. End rant.Isn’t Nico hischier a good comparison for wright?
So Wright can be a middle six center instead of a true 3CWright is better offensively than Nico was at his age. The offensive upside is higher imo.
I agree with you. That’s just my shopping list. No expectations for #37. Add in some butter and kitty litter and my shopping list would be nice. Maybe some Funions with a Reid Schaefer.I'm not committing to a RD at #37 overall.
The fact is, the New Russian Factor could drop some ridiculous, top-10 level talent to the 2nd round. How would the Devils pass on Ivan Miroshnichenko at #37? Or Alexander Perevalov? Or even Gleb Trikozov?
The Devils also are pretty desperate for depth C in the system -- and some players who could slip to #37 include Owen Beck or Nathan Gaucher.
Other top forwards would also interest me at #37, and of course Adam Sykora is among them. I'd also include Isaac Howard, Reid Schaefer, Jagger Firkus and Noah Ostlund on the list.
I think #37 is too early to zoom in on strictly positional need, especially considering some of the high-end talents who could be out there.
I always found that weird. Has him as average at everything except "hockey sense" which is debatable but has Cooley at above average at everything. It's a weird way to grade guys. The more I read up on Slaf though the more I want him at 2 and worry he won't be there at 2.Lol at pronman assessment has slaf nhl average at everything but still somehow has him as an nhl all star projection it kinda doesn’t make any sense just do away with the nhl average grace and leave the projection or a blurb
I don't think so and I'm pretty high on Drysdale. He just seems redundant on our blueline and Fitzgerald is on record saying he wants the D to get tougher to play against.Would you guys take Drysdale straight up for the #2 pick?
Fair enough. Just for fun.I don't think so and I'm pretty high on Drysdale. He just seems redundant on our blueline and Fitzgerald is on record saying he wants the D to get tougher to play against.
Is Anaheim actually looking to shop Drysdale or it's only a fun proposal?
Yeah, I figured he wasn't being shopped. He's a good one.Fair enough. Just for fun.
I'm pretty convinced now our guy is Slafkovsky, but I'd be happy with anyone of Wright, Slaf or Cooley. We were supposed to draft 5th or 6th lol, it's gravy at this point.You guys should take Cooley. Bump this later.
Just a really weird grading system in theory slaf is an average nhl player with all star upside or average nhl players are all starsI always found that weird. Has him as average at everything except "hockey sense" which is debatable but has Cooley at above average at everything. It's a weird way to grade guys. The more I read up on Slaf though the more I want him at 2 and worry he won't be there at 2.
No we don’t. There are enough people who watch prospects closely and understand team building, to teach them what they should do. When you are not that kind of person, you could visit this forum with shuted mouth and read. It would aducate you and pump your knowledge. After that you can return on your forum and tell people more info, looking in the different light.You guys should take Cooley. Bump this later.