Triumph
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2007
- 14,508
- 15,970
I don't even think this is all that wild. They have been saying they wanted depth D even before Siegs got hurt.
Traff is a nothing prospect. 2nd feels steep but it's not all that much in the end.
Traff is not a nothing prospect. I got on someone for not understanding what 27% means the other day, and yes, Traff is not a long-term NHLer most of the time. But sometimes he is, and he's had a good D+1, and his game is what this team is missing. I don't understand how he got included in this trade.
The winger prospects I'd rate over him are Gritsyuk (who is barely a prospect at his age) and Hameenaho, and he's probably on par with Squires.