Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - season begins!

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,112
12,439

Spoke of Keefe's deployment above.

I didn't look at the game break downs, but it makes sense that Nico would be getting the matchup assignments as well. Thing is though, this is not new. Nico has gotten difficult assignments in years past as well.

Should also be noted Nico's line, despite the difficult assignments, is the only one above water in terms of possession. 55% corsi. 56% shots.

Also looks as though Casey is playing as protected of minutes as possible.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,112
12,439
Sieg's and the great 8 playing getting heavy d-zone workload. Possession numbers not great, but they have done a good job keeping the puck out of the net.

I think it's time to let Casey cook in the AHL and call up my boy Misyul
Nemec as pp2? Not unreasonable, but legitimately the only option at that point.

My guess is they wait until Luke is back. Scoring goals will keep a guy in the lineup.
 

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Feb 13, 2009
17,294
12,032
Rochester, NY
Nemec as pp2? Not unreasonable, but legitimately the only option at that point.

My guess is they wait until Luke is back. Scoring goals will keep a guy in the lineup.
I'd be comfortable with Nemec on PP2 yeah. And I'm not even sure it'd be the right choice, but I think between protecting Casey this much, and having that pairing just not really working, the dropoff on the second PP unit is worth what I think would be a better 5on5 performance.
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,776
2,143
Toronto
if he continues to play the we he has for basically the entire time he’s been here, i can see this being a worthwhile move.
I could too depending on how much Luke's extension is, but we have majority of our other main players signed so I could see us not buying out Palat after next year.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,155
34,146
NJ
if he continues to play the we he has for basically the entire time he’s been here, i can see this being a worthwhile move.

The first 2 years he was at least a ~2.5 mil player. He was an effective two way 3rd liner who is more than that. If his play falls off big time and/or Cotter is able to effectively take his place in the top 9 and Palat’s a 4th liner then I think a buyout would make sense. If Cotter can’t do that and Palat proves to still be an effective two way 3rd liner we’re better off just keeping him since you’d still have to replace him and it’d be hard to do that for just ~2.5
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad