Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - season begins!

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd argue Dillon does MacDermid better than MacDermid himself.
Yes and no. Dillon can serve as the thug against teams without a true heavyweight with support from other guys willing to drop the gloves. But you need a MacDemid against the other true heavyweights.
 
The Devils have a deep lineup, but if there’s an area they may look to tweak, Fitzgerald said it’s adding a fourth-line center or maybe a top-nine forward, where the domino impact pushes someone down the lineup. Either way, he’d be looking for bottom-six depth — someone who can win defensive-zone and penalty-kill faceoffs.

“You can’t have enough depth,” Fitzgerald said. “I’ve been in touch with teams. … I’m looking for utility players, I guess — guys who can skate. I like size and versatility and guys who can play in the middle and on the wing. Just to add depth to the organization.”

 
Saros, Swayman and Helly were never truly on the market, all their teams wanted to keep and extend them. Askarov wanted to get traded for playing time and couldn’t even beat out Vitekwood for a spot on a rebuilding team. Ullmark you had to sign for a lot more than two years and he’s been awful. People keep saying Fitz needed to do something, there was nothing besides this. The player has to play better.

The problem I have (still have) with the Markstrom trade is that it's going to be ANOTHER short term fix. I think trading firsts for termporary short term fixes is just bad asset management. Especially when that short term fix is still crazy inconsistent.
 
Agree with Fitz's assessment, a 4th line center that can win faceoffs in the D Zone/PK is very specific, Someone like Nico Sturm would check a lot of those boxes that he's looking for and he'll almost definitely be available and for relatively cheap.
 
The problem I have (still have) with the Markstrom trade is that it's going to be ANOTHER short term fix. I think trading firsts for termporary short term fixes is just bad asset management. Especially when that short term fix is still crazy inconsistent.
He very clearly tried.

He went after basically every even somewhat feasible stud target.

If the prices are ridiculous because the team doesn't want to trade the guy, not much you can do
 
The problem I have (still have) with the Markstrom trade is that it's going to be ANOTHER short term fix. I think trading firsts for termporary short term fixes is just bad asset management. Especially when that short term fix is still crazy inconsistent.
If Markstrom provides average or better goaltending for the next two seasons and the Devils are contending then it's not bad asset management. Whether he provides that or not is another question but two years of solid goaltending is definitely more valuable to a playoff contender than a late 1st round pick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad