if you move bratt, it almost has to be a player-for-player deal given you don't want to really get worse in the present.. i.e. moving him to ottawa for debrincat. two guys in the same situation in terms of RFA status & appearing to have potential 'issues' finding a deal w/ their current club. not saying either team does that deal, but just a spitball.
There’s not a lot of hockey deals made when teams are in this position.
If we don’t sign Bratt due to his ask, it’s unlikely Ottawa would pony up the bag, part of their issue with DeBrincat is they have a bunch of players to pay too.
The Sens have
Now
Brady T. 8.2m
Chabot 8m
Norris 7.95m
Batherson 4.95m
Giroux 6.5m (2 more seasons)
Chychrun 4.5m (2 more seasons than raise?)
Starting 23-24
Stützle 8.35m
Zub 4.6m (+2.1m raise)
ELC
Pinto (ends after this season)
Sanderson (ends after 2023-24)
Deadcap space 3.5m next season, then drops to under a 1m. (In fact, they amusingly* they get +625k more cap space in 2024-25 before going back to negative -875k because of how Colin White’s contract buyout worked.)
It looks like they too have an internal cap they might be trying to sell DeBrincat.
The team that makes the most sense for Bratt is Detroit and there isn’t a great trade for us in the short term. But that’s how Bratt trade would mostly realistically go. Not good in the short term, at least the trade itself. The assets could be used for another player obviously.
*It’s amusing you enjoy cap space-based humor, I realize there might be a limited audience with that.