Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason part III

BostonDevil

Registered User
Jun 28, 2019
4,417
5,035
I would love to see Laine with Jack. Not at his current number or for that many years but for a year or 2 at 60% retained in exchange for Bastian. Do it, Fitz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
131,926
60,505
I bet you see lots of mishaps from people not knowing what they are doing.
I've not seen anything too bad yet.

I've seen someone gassing and braking and gassing and braking, and they were just looping it around and around. And it made me think maybe there was an incoming disaster, though it may have just been a novice or someone who was a little nervous about flying one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Xirik

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,722
17,684
I would love to see Laine with Jack. Not at his current number or for that many years but for a year or 2 at 60% retained in exchange for Bastian. Do it, Fitz.
I kind of hate the idea of Jack with any “sniper” after seeing him play with Toffoli.

It seemed that, playing with a finisher, Jack was looking to set the finisher up and I think that’s not optimal for Jack’s line. Jack’s line works best, to me, when Jack thinks he’s the best scorer and so he drives to the valuable parts of the ice and shoots constantly; when with a finisher, he shoots less and foregoes medium good chances to give time for the finisher to get open.

Obviously chemistry plays a role, maybe there is a sniper that Jack would have amazing chemistry with and they both level each other up. My general thought, though, is that Jack is at his best thinking he should score goals and not thinking about getting anyone else their looks.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,070
12,405
I kind of hate the idea of Jack with any “sniper” after seeing him play with Toffoli.

It seemed that, playing with a finisher, Jack was looking to set the finisher up and I think that’s not optimal for Jack’s line. Jack’s line works best, to me, when Jack thinks he’s the best scorer and so he drives to the valuable parts of the ice and shoots constantly; when with a finisher, he shoots less and foregoes medium good chances to give time for the finisher to get open.

Obviously chemistry plays a role, maybe there is a sniper that Jack would have amazing chemistry with and they both level each other up. My general thought, though, is that Jack is at his best thinking he should score goals and not thinking about getting anyone else their looks.
I don't know if we want to describe Caufield circa 2017-19 as a sniper(we probably do), but he was certainly a finisher on that line, and that duo was excellent.

Jack with Bratt is great, so I do like the idea of another guy who can skate, pass and finish on Jack's line.

For sure though, Jack will have a guy with size on his line this upcoming year.
 
Last edited:

Camille the Eel

Registered User
I kind of hate the idea of Jack with any “sniper” after seeing him play with Toffoli.

It seemed that, playing with a finisher, Jack was looking to set the finisher up and I think that’s not optimal for Jack’s line. Jack’s line works best, to me, when Jack thinks he’s the best scorer and so he drives to the valuable parts of the ice and shoots constantly; when with a finisher, he shoots less and foregoes medium good chances to give time for the finisher to get open.

Obviously chemistry plays a role, maybe there is a sniper that Jack would have amazing chemistry with and they both level each other up. My general thought, though, is that Jack is at his best thinking he should score goals and not thinking about getting anyone else their looks.
Yes I like him driving a line with supporting cast leaving the middle open for him and letting him be third man up high - year before last, when healthy, thats how he did his damage. Having him as a set up guy for a “sniper” as such is not ideal. He needs to be play with very athletic guys who can keep up. And yeah he’s great with Bratt.
Of course the power play is another thing.
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,423
13,227
Connecticut
I would love to see Laine with Jack. Not at his current number or for that many years but for a year or 2 at 60% retained in exchange for Bastian. Do it, Fitz.

That line would be awful defensively even if a time-traveling prime Pandolfo was the third forward.

Would be a quick way to find out if Markstrom was worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oneiro

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,296
22,257
St Petersburg
Laine on Jacks line is a stupid idea. Put out heads from ea sports simulators and be real. Jack needs players who can grind the puck and find rebounds on Jacks shots. Players should move well of course.
If Jack and Meier can’t click well, Laine is absolutely wrong player to play on the Jacks wing.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Jack and Bratt and board guy is what I want.
More like Jack and Bratt and bored guy because the other two are scoring so much thr third guy doesn’t have to do anything.

Is this thing on?

Thanks so much folks I’ll be here all week and don’t forget to tip your waitress.
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
131,926
60,505
That line would be awful defensively even if a time-traveling prime Pandolfo was the third forward.

Would be a quick way to find out if Markstrom was worth it.
I think Pandolfo was highly overrated. And he also fell apart at a pretty young age. I wouldn't have ever considered him an elite defensive forward at any point post-lockout, if even after 2003. I do think Madden was, but I definitely think by about 2006-2007 he was about done being an elite or even good defensive forward. And Pandolfo was already shot all around by that point and Madden couldn't carry him. Madden was a good or at least useful player up until his last year here though. I think Brylin was better in 07-08 than Pandolfo was by that point. Then Brylin left the NHL to go play in the KHL for the rest of his career, while we signed Pandolfo to a 3 year deal at a significantly higher salary than he had ever gotten at any point prior to that. Like 4 or 5 times higher.

I've always said that Travis Zajac was better than either of them. I also think Holik up until after he left was better. Zajac on any of those cup teams would have been completely unfair.

I think my pecking order would be Zajac, Holik, Madden. I think Holik was the most skilled and best offensive player of the three.
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,423
13,227
Connecticut
I think Pandolfo was highly overrated. And he also fell apart at a pretty young age. I wouldn't have ever considered him an elite defensive forward at any point post-lockout, if even after 2003. I do think Madden was, but I definitely think by about 2006-2007 he was about done being an elite or even good defensive forward. And Pandolfo was already shot all around by that point and Madden couldn't carry him. Madden was a good or at least useful player up until his last year here though. I think Brylin was better in 07-08 than Pandolfo was by that point. Then Brylin left the NHL to go play in the KHL for the rest of his career, while we signed Pandolfo to a 3 year deal at a significantly higher salary than he had ever gotten at any point prior to that. Like 4 or 5 times higher.

I've always said that Travis Zajac was better than either of them. I also think Holik up until after he left was better. Zajac on any of those cup teams would have been completely unfair.

I think my pecking order would be Zajac, Holik, Madden. I think Holik was the most skilled and best offensive player of the three.

I considered putting Holik or Madden but they were both centers, and Hughes is already the center on our hypothetical line. I needed a winger and Pandolfo was probably one of the best purely defensive wingers we had.

Maybe Brylin would have been the better choice. (Elias is up there too, but obviously he had a lot of offense as well, so I consider him more two-way.)
 

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
39,293
27,188
North of Toronto
I considered putting Holik or Madden but they were both centers, and Hughes is already the center on our hypothetical line. I needed a winger and Pandolfo was probably one of the best purely defensive wingers we had.

Maybe Brylin would have been the better choice. (Elias is up there too, but obviously he had a lot of offense as well, so I consider him more two-way.)

mcleod was the best three way player we ever had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Aurinko

Registered User
Apr 1, 2015
3,470
2,266
Finland
mcleod was the best three way player we ever had.

Don't think anyone will be replacing his skillset... Until the exit last season, he was having a nice 69% defensive zone faceoff % and 65% overall. Not to mention the timely goals and hussle he brings. In my books the most underappreciated player in the league.


1722199021648.png
 

BostonDevil

Registered User
Jun 28, 2019
4,417
5,035
I kind of hate the idea of Jack with any “sniper” after seeing him play with Toffoli.

It seemed that, playing with a finisher, Jack was looking to set the finisher up and I think that’s not optimal for Jack’s line. Jack’s line works best, to me, when Jack thinks he’s the best scorer and so he drives to the valuable parts of the ice and shoots constantly; when with a finisher, he shoots less and foregoes medium good chances to give time for the finisher to get open.

Obviously chemistry plays a role, maybe there is a sniper that Jack would have amazing chemistry with and they both level each other up. My general thought, though, is that Jack is at his best thinking he should score goals and not thinking about getting anyone else their looks.
I want to see it. Toffoli was their leading scorer when he was here. The year before Haula should have had 100 points but couldn't throw a puck in the ocean from a boat with all the feeds Jack gave him.

Just because Jack CAN do everything, doesn't mean he SHOULD do everything.

I won't be able to stomach a 'Palat - Jack - Haula' line this year.

I think we need someone to play with him. Really play with him.
 

Nubmer6

Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine
Sponsor
Jul 14, 2013
14,121
18,966
The Village
Yeah - we have too many lefties

Mercer, Noesen, Bastian are our only righty forwards

Get a righty to replace Palat and then run Bratt on his left
When it comes to wings, I don't care about handedness. It's most important with D, and it's nice to have at least one right shooting center to take draws.

I'm not sure how much a right catching goalie affects a team, good or bad.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad