Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - offseason part III

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2012
29,652
60,701
Belmar
I am once again asking…what I miss

IMG_7719.jpeg
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
68,100
33,182
Because he was in NJ training a couple weeks ago which random players always seem to do. There was never a legitimate link.
That and Fitz has acted like a GM on the hot seat this offseason

I'm signing a lot of you into an old folks home.

It was already said when it came up that he was practicing in NJ that he can't play in the NHL.:shakehead
With our luck they would have announced he was eligible five minutes before the signing was confirmed official, just like the Oilers did with Bowman
 

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,334
24,725
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
disgusting stuff. Really soured on Fitz the past 9 months or so.
Now after learning that rumor was a load of horses--t, are you still soured on Fitz?

tbh, I haven't seen anything that Fitz has done that should cause "Souring" on him....

(well...except the whole 'hiring of Travis Green' fiasco...ahem)
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,441
13,252
Connecticut
Bogus Lucic rumors, eh?

I guess we needed something to fill the time until Mercer's new contract causes the next board ructions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glenwo2

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,068
19,597
Isn't the whole Lucic thing still being investigated by the league or whatever? If he's reinstated, I can easily see the rumor being true but hopefully it's not. After the McLeod/Foote thing, Lucic is the last thing we need for that type of reputation, let alone he f***ing sucks as a hockey player and the antithesis of this team at its peak
 

britdevil

Tea with milk...
Feb 15, 2007
26,666
13,852
UK
Isn't the whole Lucic thing still being investigated by the league or whatever? If he's reinstated, I can easily see the rumor being true but hopefully it's not. After the McLeod/Foote thing, Lucic is the last thing we need for that type of reputation, let alone he f***ing sucks as a hockey player and the antithesis of this team at its peak

230px-Tom_Fitzgerald_2012-06-22.JPG


Can't teach size.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ZachaFlockaFlame

PKs Broken Stick

Registered User
Oct 9, 2008
9,276
4,731
Because the gap in expectations between a 7OA and a 29 OA are greater than the gap in expectations between a 29 OA and a third round pick.

That’s what makes a bust: high expectations. Quenneville, Matteau, and Corrente aren’t really busts, they’re just low-expectation picks that didn’t pan out.

The problem with the Devils is that they whiffed on so many of these mid-late round 1sts. We’ve whiffed on every single mid-late 1st since Zajac twenty years ago. We have not had a 1st round pick later than 12 that hit. It’s absurd and infuriating.

He's still young. Way too early to be calling him a bust compared to Matteau. Matteau is a bust. Holtz is still unknown
 

PKs Broken Stick

Registered User
Oct 9, 2008
9,276
4,731
He certainly drafted for need this year, not sure about other years. It's also at times subjective to say when they draft for need and when they actually have certain players ranked higher on their board (a la Nemec over Wright when many of us including me thought they passed over Wright mostly cause he would have been a 3C here and reached for a 'need' pick instead).

My connotation of drafting for need differs from others here though, imo you draft for need when you draft someone clearly behind on your board because of position - Muk was one I kinda thought was in that vein since he was thought of as a late second round pick we pushed up a round since we didn't have a second rounder and already took two forwards, but that worked out too.

When it's more of a tiebreaker situation a la Holtz-Rossi or whomever else was around that range I don't really consider that drafting for need. It's not like Holtz was ranked a top twenty pick and we pumped him up to seven - him, Rossi and Askarov were all in the same range and they either chose the wrong one or developed him horribly, we'll find out which this year. I don't buy the meme that they drafted Holtz specifically to play with Jack though, especially since they never really tried him with Jack for any length of time to begin with!

This is a good point and something that does highlight the difference. This past draft for example, I don't think Fitz passed on higher upside players straight up to fit a need. What I think he did was tell his scouts, "This is what we need, find me the best players that fit this profile". That ofc being, size, physicality. So, in a sense, it's still drafting for need but I get your point.

and they did try him with jack. They did pretty well together...then Ruff broke them up for whatever reason when reg season started.

Matteau was picked near last in a weak draft, where almost nobody picked after him has done great either. If you want to go straight up busts, John Quenneville played fewer games, Ari Ahonen didn't play any at all, Lance Ward never played here at all, Corey Foster was bad too, etc. It's only the name that has anyone thinking of Matteau.

Which is what I said. There's far bigger busts than Matteau, who would also be far bigger busts than Holtz, so idk why he's even being discussed. Again, it's too early for that
 

PKs Broken Stick

Registered User
Oct 9, 2008
9,276
4,731
Drafting is hard and an inexact science but I don't belive teams sit around very often going "scouts, don't get me the best player, fill a future NHL need instead". For me, I think fans believe players when drafted have a hard number and tier while NHL teams think the tiers are broader, reflecting how hard scouting and development is.
No, they don't say straight up, fill an nhl need, but they probably do highlight certain things to look for. Like size, skating, physicality. You can't deny this was the theme when Shero was here. He emphasized speed and raw potential. A lot of his picks were high risk prospects (with speed), with some of them panning out. Since Fitz has come here, the philosophy has changed a lot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad