Mgd31
Registered User
My sources are telling me the Zacha/Huala trade was the final straw for Bratt.
What were the exact words in terms of not hearing anything back?Are you forgetting Bratt willingly held out on the last go around?
TF openly said that a large contract offer was sent MONTHS ago and hadn't heard zilch back?
Quite a bit of evidence to show that this leaning towards a player issue, not a team one.
I don't know why people say this on the one hand, then on the other laud all the team-friendly deals Fitz signs. Why don't you think he's lowballing him, because he took a very minor risk with Hughes that now looks like a team-friendly deal by at least a million or so per year? Guy just signed Siegs to a deal people thought was a million or so less than he should have commanded.Nothing from Fitz's track record suggests he's lowballing him, so I'm definitely going to put more stock in Bratt's hard negotiations.
Fitz/Shero (Fitz was his AGM at the time and was no doubt involved in the negotiations) have given out big contracts based on potential and ok production before, notably Hughes and Nico.
I mean.. from what we do know about them having offered a hefty extension, Id argue theres a real low % chance that we low-balled Jesper. At least a much lower % chance of it not being Bratt's side that is causing issuesAnd there is nothing wrong with that. But the crayon eaters that have already decided that Fitz is being a cheap ass or Bratt wants out is ridiculous. Not one person here has any information on the actual negotiations or what each side is looking for but people have already picked sides.
Yeah, your right. I now hate Jesper Bratt and I want him traded to Arizona to play in front of 5000 college kids now (sarcasm).I have absolutely no idea. Do you?
Do you honestly believe that Fitz, a man who has opened the cheque book at every opportunity so far in his GM career, is seriously out here singling out Bratt and offering lowball contracts?
For all we know Bratt eventually caved and took the original two year contract that was offered? Which tbh, is and was a perfectly fair contract for a 22 year old with good potential.
Jesper Bratt willingly missed camp. Jesper Bratt has not responded to a contract offer that has been made. Jesper Bratt is going to salary arbitration.
Undeniable facts at this point. It's not a great look for the young man.
I agree. Huberdeau would be an upgradeIt sucks to be forced to move a good player but it looks like that's where we are headed
Yeah, your right. I now hate Jesper Bratt and I want him traded to Arizona to play in front of 5000 college kids now (sarcasm).
All I am saying is, none of us have any clue what either side is asking for so let's not jump to conclusions and hate Bratt or Fitz because of how this is playing out.
That's definitely a good point, never saw it that way. With that being said, I'm still going to put more stock in Bratt's and his agent's tendency to have hard negotiations.I don't know why people say this on the one hand, then on the other laud all the team-friendly deals Fitz signs. Why don't you think he's lowballing him, because he took a very minor risk with Hughes that now looks like a team-friendly deal by at least a million or so per year? Guy just signed Siegs to a deal people thought was a million or so less than he should have commanded.
I don't know why people say this on the one hand, then on the other laud all the team-friendly deals Fitz signs. Why don't you think he's lowballing him, because he took a very minor risk with Hughes that now looks like a team-friendly deal by at least a million or so per year? Guy just signed Siegs to a deal people thought was a million or so less than he should have commanded.
This. Whatever happens happens. It will suck if he isnt a long term Devil but worst case scenario , we will get a player back in return if he wants to walk. It will be a kick to the nut sack but we net result should still be a very good player playing for us?.
As much as I love Jesper Bratt, I loved the Devils long before him and will long after him. He isnt some level of player weve never seen like Jack.
I dont see how those team-friendly deals extrapolate to him possibly low-balling Jesper.I don't know why people say this on the one hand, then on the other laud all the team-friendly deals Fitz signs. Why don't you think he's lowballing him, because he took a very minor risk with Hughes that now looks like a team-friendly deal by at least a million or so per year? Guy just signed Siegs to a deal people thought was a million or so less than he should have commanded.
They can mutually agree on a 1-8 year extension before arbitration. If Bratt wants to get to UFA as soon as possible or net on himself for another great season / wait for more cap room to free up - he agrees to a one year deal that would ”maybe”? be higher than what the ruling might be (or a dollar amount Bratt is ok with for one year ).The process of agreeing to the 1-year deal doesnt begin until tomorrow's hearing I thought. Both sides give a number and wait until the judge makes a call, idt they discuss a 1-year deal, only a multi-year extension prior to arbitration
I could be wrong though, but thats how Ive always understood arbitration
I don't know why people say this on the one hand, then on the other laud all the team-friendly deals Fitz signs. Why don't you think he's lowballing him, because he took a very minor risk with Hughes that now looks like a team-friendly deal by at least a million or so per year? Guy just signed Siegs to a deal people thought was a million or so less than he should have commanded.
Really? You dont see what the possible connection could be?I dont see how those team-friendly deals extrapolate to him possibly low-balling Jesper.
Yeah that I am not getting. Fitz MO with RFAs has been signing them to team friendly deals where their dollar amounts are most likely less then they are worth.
Which is also his job, he is supposed to try and find savings where he can. Cap space is at a premium this year. Doubtful we will be able to clear much to fit in a Bratt blank check and what we will be forced to pay Wood.
Other side though is its his agent's job to get his client as much money possible, not to sign long term team friendly deals. Bratt was our best winger last season. A top winger across the whole league. His camp clearly don't believe last year was a fluke and if it wasn't then yeah he would be an $8 million player in two years as a free agent.
Why would they take significantly less and give away 4+ UFA years with that belief?
It's a tough situation but until we get more info I don't think anyone has really done anything wrong.
What's the chances that this plays out into the start of the season? That would be the real kick in the nuts. Bratt's done it before so I wouldn't put it past him.
Tatar's not getting traded.It sucks to be forced to move a good player but it looks like that's where we are headed
If they agree to a 4 year deal, he will stay here and all will be forgotten. That buys two years on UFA status.If Bratt gets a short term deal (4 years), he won’t be on the Devils. I can’t imagine the cap skyrocketing. His actions proves he would walk into Free Agency.
The only issue, I don’t know who you would trade him for. Timo? Kyle Connor? Necas? Nothing really works.
Plus, the Sharks are in limbo. If they were smart, they should lean heavy into picks/prospects. If they were smart..