SKNJD9
Hi, I'm mat.
Yeah the quotes don't do him justice I thought listening to the whole thingFitzie's full comments are pretty spot on
Yeah the quotes don't do him justice I thought listening to the whole thingFitzie's full comments are pretty spot on
What? How do you take this from that at all. Having someone who thinks in a similar way to you doesn’t mean that at all. You literally just pulled that out of your ass. They fired Recchi and Nas so not sure how you can say there’s no accountability.Sounds like Fitz just wants a bunch of yes men in the organization. Not what I wanted to hear. This almost reinforces that we are like a country club. No accountability, no one to push back & say you know what this is a horrible idea. If Fitz goes into next season with Ruff he will suffer the same fate as Shero. What a odd hill to die on seeing your so called "mentor" got fired for doing the same thing your doing now.
No that’s is almost certainly not true. He hired him but I think he’s just saying that more so in the sense that they work together and are building this together.I dunno. Ruff "Brought into be his partner" makes me feel almost like it's not his call to hire/fire him, and that they're both on the same level.
I'm just saying it could be interpreted differently. Maybe this supports the whole "By committee" thing?No that’s is almost certainly not true. He hired him but I think he’s just saying that more so in the sense that they work together and are building this together.
He literally said firing the other coaches was his decision.
Could be but it really wouldn’t make any sense. I think it is a by commitee thing but Fitz has the final say. Sounds like he just believes and likes to work with him.I'm just saying it could be interpreted differently. Maybe this supports the whole "By committee" thing?
Is the full presser out? I can't find it on the website for some reason.
Only way I can see a GM give up a quality piece for the pick is if they need the cost certainty and cap savings and give up a good player that is jas an expensive cap hit or high qualifying offer to retain said player.Every year we talk about moving our 1st for a young roster player who can help immediately, but I'll believe it when I see it. You've got to find a team who values your 1st as highly as they value the player you're giving up, which NHL general managers generally don't do.
I especially hope he's not thinking about moving a 1st for a goalie. I get that we've reached DEFCON 1 without goalie situation and that searching through the reject bin will continue to disappoint us. It's easy to say "f*** it, just pay the price and we won't have to worry about this ever again." But it would be horrendous asset management to trade a top-5 pick for a goalie unless it's one of like four guys in the league.
Mr. Fitzgerald will have to alter his draft strategies of the past two years. There will be several players available all throughout the draft who can address the needs he himself has stated."There are areas that have to grow and develop and that's something that Lindy and I had a very frank conversation about."
"We want to be the best. You just can't go from 0 to 60. I think we're growing but that being said, I have standards that I want everybody to adhere by. I want habits that are - we do things like blinking our eyelids in the game or in the boardroom."
"I want our team to play the right way. I want our team to play with certain details that I believe will push us in the right direction becoming that contending team we believe we're going to be. Playing with the same habits, not constant reminders. Some growth in understanding what their job is. Boxing out in front, the physical part, ending plays down low. If we don't do that, it doesn't matter what our goaltending looks like. So areas of the defense that I truly believe...I want to get bigger, I want to get more mobile, I want to be harder to play against...There's still growth that we need to do. Whether it's trusting their gaps and closing gaps quickly, closing down low, being detailed, stick details, things like that. That has to continue to evolve and improve. I like our defense, I like our size and our mobility. I like our makeup. But there is obviously room for improvement in all areas of our game."
Exactly what I wanted to hear. He sees it while acknowledging the offensive upside. Now don't f*** up the draft, Tom.
Yeah, all I could think of was how much Jiricek fits the profile he discussed.Mr. Fitzgerald will have to alter his draft strategies of the past two years. There will be several players available all throughout the draft who can address the needs he himself has stated.
Jiricek would be the perfect pick in the 1st round. In the later rounds the Devils should be keying on prospects like Reid Schaefer, Noah Warren, Maveric Lamoureux, Kirill Dolzhenkov, Matyas Sapovaliv, Parker Bell, Brennan Ali and Liam Arnsby.
But we must draft with strategy and cohesion, no more gifting picks to individual scouts. There can be no more Baumgartner and Shlaine and Vilen and Hurtig picks.
Fitz sounds like a guy who is going to change up the forward group as much as he can. Says we have too much of the same players and need "heavier skill"
Nichushkin and Niederreiter should be the names we're throwing out there. Maybe Marchment. Definitely Lyubushkin to fill the hole on RD.That's why I think people who throw out names like Forsberg, Gaudreau, Fiala, etc. as being targets are delusional. Spending money on that type of player will not help this lineup.
We already have a couple of different versions of those types of players in Hughes and Bratt (and arguably similar style players in Boqvist, Tatar)
He also seemed to be pretty clear that Boqvist needs to be comfortable on the wing. It makes me think a 3C is on his target list for acquisition.
those 3 would def help the lineup. it would basically ensure a high end winger on both of the top lines and help a lot when there are injury issues. Devils need a guy like Niederreiter/Nichuskin for sure but those 3 are the exceptions to the same type of player comment imo. It would obviously depend on the costs but those guys are not Tatar like additions, they are elite players.That's why I think people who throw out names like Forsberg, Gaudreau, Fiala, etc. as being targets are delusional. Spending money on that type of player will not help this lineup.
We already have a couple of different versions of those types of players in Hughes and Bratt (and arguably similar style players in Boqvist, Tatar)
He also seemed to be pretty clear that Boqvist needs to be comfortable on the wing. It makes me think a 3C is on his target list for acquisition.
Did they run the same defensive scheme when Nas was under Hynes as they have under Ruff? I was wondering if the scheme was Nas' or if he was just implementing whatever strategy Ruff had in mind? So will the next assistant just be running the same (not so great) scheme?Not thrilled with the prospect of Ruff coming back, but it should've been at least obvious that Fitzgerald values Ruff in a way that GMs don't often value coaches. They've got to switch up what they're doing in the defensive zone and hopefully Nasreddine's exit means that's possible. Please keep his penalty killing system in place, though. Whatever was done in 2021 was an absolute disaster.
Boqvist is best at C though. I think the team thinks the same as he was tried on the wing but has since been exclusively at C ?That's why I think people who throw out names like Forsberg, Gaudreau, Fiala, etc. as being targets are delusional. Spending money on that type of player will not help this lineup.
We already have a couple of different versions of those types of players in Hughes and Bratt (and arguably similar style players in Boqvist, Tatar)
He also seemed to be pretty clear that Boqvist needs to be comfortable on the wing. It makes me think a 3C is on his target list for acquisition.
I'll give Ruff credit, they did not run the same "have the opponent play keepaway for a minute-plus" strategy under him like they did with Hynes.Did they run the same defensive scheme when Nas was under Hynes as they have under Ruff?