Its easy to say we got out of those deals at the right time based the on dollars...or even current performance...Really respect Jim dropping the Severson/Graves/Wood post.
Takes a lot of gumption to make the missmeyet.jpg post about a group of players who are all widely derided for their dogshit contracts, and two of whom were literally benched last season for sucking.
We got out at exactly the right time on all three of those dudes, and I say that as a lifelong Severson booster.
It’s easy to say because it’s obviously correct.Its easy to say we got out of those deals at the right time based the on dollars...or even current performance...
But our results before and after say otherwise...we can get into the minutia of we closer to a bottom 5 team than a playoff last season but the personnel changes were pretty glaring.... especially on defense.
It’s easy to say because it’s obviously correct.
We should not have attempted to pay Severson 6M a year or given Graves 4.5x6.
I’m not saying we didn’t need another defenseman last year, we clearly did. But a bad deal isn’t better than no deal.
It’s easy to say because it’s obviously correct.
We should not have attempted to pay Severson 6M a year or given Graves 4.5x6.
I’m not saying we didn’t need another defenseman last year, we clearly did. But a bad deal isn’t better than no deal.
Really respect Jim dropping the Severson/Graves/Wood post.
Takes a lot of gumption to make the missmeyet.jpg post about a group of players who are all widely derided for their dogshit contracts, and two of whom were literally benched last season for sucking.
We got out at exactly the right time on all three of those dudes, and I say that as a lifelong Severson booster.
A bad deal is better than no deal for a team that's ready to seriously compete.It’s easy to say because it’s obviously correct.
We should not have attempted to pay Severson 6M a year or given Graves 4.5x6.
I’m not saying we didn’t need another defenseman last year, we clearly did. But a bad deal isn’t better than no deal.
Shooting blanks in the dark ..Haven't seen the post but it is perfect timing, because the new guys haven't played at all yet. It's like how sometimes you look at the team's prospect pool in May and think 'huh, there's not a whole lot here' but of course there's a draft coming up in the following month.
I will certainly never think about any of those guys again. They're all fine players and they have their use. That's what makes up most of NHL teams; it's not what wins championships.
Yeah that matters, if they weren’t terrible we’re much closer to okay.The big issue last year wasn’t not having another guy. It was Siegs and Marino falling off cliffs. If they repeat 22-23 it’s not a real issue. Also obviously Dougie missing 75% of the year but that’s not something you can foresee and Nemec filled in better than any extra D would’ve
There’s wayyyy more than enough money for Mercer. We have 5.75 left. Harley just signed for 4 mil 2 years and he was substantially better than Mercer.
By the time of the big final contract drama those critics had long since dried up though if my memory isn’t too shoddyThere were a lot of Bratt skeptics here, I bet @glenwo2 has them all written down somewhere. They got louder during the various contentious negotiations or when he was on a cold streak.
Just look at his career season by season points, every season until 73 point breakout I remember many posters saying he wasn't good enough and multiple bratt trade scenarios being presented.
Yeah that matters, if they weren’t terrible we’re much closer to okay.
but we saw 63 games of Brendan Smith last year and injuries or no, that’s just unacceptable in 2024
We dont have 5.75 we have like 4.9 with cap overages ect. Yeah Id say it is still enough to get him signed short term, but long term + UFA years that mercer might want may/is driving up the prices
Shortsighted, chicken little thinking.Last year for players like Bratt, Meier, Jack and Nico were poison to their careers and our window
Eichel might not be a good example...he had to run away from his floundering organization to find success....Shortsighted, chicken little thinking.
It was not a good year. It’s hardly the end of the world. Good players lose all the time before they win.
Jack Hughes has more series wins in his first 5 years in the league than Mackinnon did. He’s tied with Ovechkin.
Eichel missed the playoffs every single season in his career (7 times!) before winning the Cup.
Barkov missed the playoffs 5 of his first 6 years, and didn’t win a series until year 9.
POISON
Shortsighted, chicken little thinking.
It was not a good year. It’s hardly the end of the world. Good players lose all the time before they win.
Jack Hughes has more series wins in his first 5 years in the league than Mackinnon did. He’s tied with Ovechkin.
Eichel missed the playoffs every single season in his career (7 times!) before winning the Cup.
Barkov missed the playoffs 5 of his first 6 years, and didn’t win a series until year 9.
POISON
Was that Paris Hilton?
Ok, I've reached the old man stage of life where I don't understand the silly voiceover thing going on here, but I'm happy to see these two once again.
I definitely would have preferred making the playoffs even if it was a first round loss, but now with the season in the rear view it’s pretty easy to be happy with how it shook out. We all knew the defence would suffer going into the season, and then everything else also went wrong too so there was no chance anyway. So they miss and the holes are properly addressed and the team is better for it going into this season. It sucks that missing the playoffs for one bad luck season has poisoned the minds of half the fan base seemingly, but they’ll come around once this season gets on track.Maybe I’m in the minority here but I don’t really give a shit about just making the playoffs. I’d rather pick up a Silayev at 10OA over going into the playoffs with a team that looks like shit and is just going to get trounced anyway. Who has ever won a Cup with a “get in and see what happens” type team? I’d imagine people would say the Kings because they were the 8th seed but even they had elite metrics.
Maybe I’m in the minority here but I don’t really give a shit about just making the playoffs. I’d rather pick up a Silayev at 10OA over going into the playoffs with a team that looks like shit and is just going to get trounced anyway. Who has ever won a Cup with a “get in and see what happens” type team? I’d imagine people would say the Kings because they were the 8th seed but even they had elite metrics.
Now I have to decide between this book and @StevenToddIves new book Even After Always… decisions decisions
Samesies.and in fact, I'd rather have Pesce + Dillon vs Severson + Graves
This is partly why we are in the situation we're in/have been. We spent the majority of the 2005 to 2012 seasons not being legit threats but not bottoming out enough to get those high end draft picks.Maybe I’m in the minority here but I don’t really give a shit about just making the playoffs. I’d rather pick up a Silayev at 10OA over going into the playoffs with a team that looks like shit and is just going to get trounced anyway. Who has ever won a Cup with a “get in and see what happens” type team? I’d imagine people would say the Kings because they were the 8th seed but even they had elite metrics.