Funny I thought that too but Kraken can't pass on Powers or Beniers right?I legitimately wouldn't be shocked if we traded up just to ensure that we got Hughes
Funny I thought that too but Kraken can't pass on Powers or Beniers right?I legitimately wouldn't be shocked if we traded up just to ensure that we got Hughes
Does anyone remember what people said about quinn's defensive game in his draft year?
To take who? Do you really think 1 to 3 are going to go D?Ensure another team doesn’t trade into that spot.
To take who? Do you really think 1 to 3 are going to go D?
Ya 124 goals for Ana compared to 145 for NJ.While this shouldn’t necessarily play a part because you draft based on your prospect pool, the Ducks couldn’t score last season. They were dead last in Goals For (we were 6th to last).
I’m not sure what the Ducks actually need more though in terms of prospects and they often draft defensemen in the 1st round.
One of my favorite trivia questions - who is only New Jersey native taken #1st overall in NHL Draft.Born in New Brunswick NJ!
I do expect a lot of mocks having us taking Luke solely because writers are lazy and having the team with his sibling makes writing that little byline easy.
I honestly don’t think there’s any actual possibility of that happening. I would be pretty unhappy and weirded out if did happen.IF we wanted to what do you think we'd have to give up to trade picks with the Ducks?
If we are trading up from 4th, we are probably making a bad trade in terms of value.I honestly don’t think there’s any actual possibility of that happening. I would be pretty unhappy and weirded out if did happen.
Toronto gave up a 2nd (37th) and a 3rd (68th) to move up from 7th to 5th in 2008.
Our 2nd is significantly worse, it’s the 54th pick. And we have the 68th in the 3rd. Would both those picks be enough? I can’t say. They might want both 1sts and give us their 3rd (66th) or something like that.
The problem is our 2nd kind of sucks because Vegas has our early 2nd. And don’t bother making up packages involving prospects, these trades involve picks.
It’s a dumb idea, we’re in a great position to get Luke because got bumped down. He definitely can be more attractive due to Jack but the team doesn’t have to go crazy here. There’s no way Jack’s expecting them to trade up for Luke because ludicrous, he’s understandably hoping his brother will be drafted if he’s still available.
If the team is neurotic as some fans are to be dumb enough to trade up for Luke I’m going to be so unhappy. We got the 4th pick, deal with whatever players are left.
That’s the way I see it, if Clarke is the guy you want... only have to worry bout Seattle taking him.... seems pointless to trade up with Anaheim.... Seattle might be worth it thoDrysdale plays the right side right? Would make the odds of Anaheim taking Clarke low.
Dont sleep on Guenther. It would be nice if we took him and still got a d man with the Islanders pick. The need for a top tier D man is just so high that passing on Clarke or Hughes would not be easy.
If we are trading up from 4th, we are probably making a bad trade in terms of value.
I completely agree and foot injury helps here, he shot up public draft ranks because he was white hot in Dec/Jan, but cooled down and then got injured. His very shortened season, which the equivalent of Quinn’s D-1 year due to Luke’s youth, that had no international tournaments makes him a bit of an unknown. He’s got a high ceiling, but he’s not his brothers, he’s raw and he’s very far from NHL ready. I’m not particularly afraid of him going top 3 at all, we don’t have to sacrifice assets out of fear. And if does, that’s life.I legitimately wouldn't be shocked if we traded up just to ensure that we got Hughes
It would certainly be something for Quinn to considerIf we take Hughes we could pull the reverse Niedermayer and have Quinn sign with us when he hits free agency.