I was really done with Boqvist a few months ago, but there's no logic in arguing against him right now.
He clearly just had no business being in the NHL full time in 19-20 (which he was for the first few months, before we sent him back to Binghamton) and now he clearly does.
Most people just have a problem acknowledging that no player is consistent every game or every 10-20 game increment or whatever. It's why the whole ''Schneider is a .920% the last 20 games'' stuff is actually a thing and is used as evidence that he can't be a bad player because that means more than his last 120 games.
And it's the same thing on the other end. Like Boqvist having 6 points in his last 10 games or 7 in his last 12. That's not why he should be here next year, because he's producing at a 50 point pace over 10 games, but because he's producing at a 33 point pace over 82 games. And if Boqvist could get 33 points (he won't this year, he won't come close to having finished with 82 games in the NHL) in an 82 game NHL season while playing the minutes he's getting right now then that's great.
Boqvist wouldn't be getting a spot next year based on these last 10 or 12 games, but based on his 50 games overall this season.
After reading my post, it does read like it could be an anti-Boqvist post, but my intentions were to highlight that Boqvist is going to get a spot next year (which I believe he SHOULD) because of his 50 games overall this year (pacing for 33 points as of now) and not just because of his 6 points in the last 10 games, which seems to be the argument as to why he shouldn't get a spot next year.