I stay away from analysis that categorically sums up a player’s contributions to “shots and passes.” J Fresh knows this and thus calling this data “Does Stuff” which carries a less authoritative tone.
Anyway, Chandler Stephenson is good and the Kraken were terrible. Both are facts.
I think Stephenson is closer to bad than good now
Stephenson is straight up bad. He just put up a 39% xG with the SECOND WORST on the team being a 44%. The minutes without him the Kraken had a 49%. Being 10 pts worse than your team is out of this world bad
The only possible positive spin you could put on Stephenson is he's a 3rd liner being tasked with being a 1st liner. Even then though I'm not going to confidently say he'd be a good 3rd liner and he's 31 making 6.25 for another 6 years. Just f***ing brutal. It was clearly an awful signing from the moment it was made and year one went predictably terribly.
Last edited: