- Apr 20, 2005
- 2,592
- 1,994
Agree with all. the question isn't if he'll be worth his contract or anything close.This is not an off year. This is who he is. He’s been showing you for 3 years now.
He’s been here for 3 years now and has not paced for 40 points once. MAYBE he would have hit 40 points in 22-23 if he didn’t miss 30+ games, but he still paced for under it.
I don’t think not having a kid is going to make him useful.
That whole situation caused him to go from a completely unplayable, liability of a player to just not being a complete liability of a player. He also had a high shooting percentage career, so don’t expect this many goals next year.
Why are we supposed to believe a 34 year old, 30 point player is going to bounce back? It seems like a reach. He’s just done.
Players this old don’t bounce back. Unless you’re Ovechkin or somebody like that. The guy has been bad or at the very least massively underwhelming his entire Devils tenure. And he’s getting worse every year. The idea of him bouncing back is a massive prayer.
it's simply whether or not he could be similar to a player you could get for a short term $2+ million contract.
There's just not enough cap savings from buying out Palat to believe we could bring in someone materially better than him with that space. How much of an improvement is Brandon Saad?
IMO, the best bet for that spot is Lachance, but I can't see relying on him as an NHLer when he's only had a cup of coffee in the AHL. It's not clear if he's NHL ready right now, or if he needs AHL time.
IMO, our best move is to roll with Palat for next year and see what we have in Lachance. Can go from there.