Zajacs Bowl Cut
Lets Go Baby
Mercer stinks. I don't know why that is so hard for some of you to accept. He has done literally nothing since the 2023 playoffs started. we're talking almost 200 games here.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerMercer stinks. I don't know why that is so hard for some of you to accept. He has done literally nothing since the 2023 playoffs started. we're talking almost 200 games here.
Notice how everyone neatly is at 100% between dzone and ozone? Seems like you are missing a zone that play can start in that isn’t the ozone or dzone.
You drop them in the average between Oz/Dz... isn't that obvious?
Seems like he has finished breakaways at a decent percentage thru the years. Perhaps you don’t watch all the gamesGets a breakaway you know it’s not a goal![]()
I just showed you hockey Reference is showing it 60/40 for off/defHe doesn’t start anywhere near 60% in the dzone - you agree that you miss read or didn’t understand that stat correct?
For Pits, Packages, and Feet.If he stinks that bad maybe he needs some of that full body deodorant stuff that you see ads for now.
I just showed you hockey Reference is showing it 60/40 for off/def
Mercer doesn’t “stink,” he’s just not likely to be the top-6 two way forward or the perfect third line center behind Hughes and Hischier that a lot of us were envisioning after his rookie year. He’s a competitive kid and i wouldn’t be surprised if he instantly regains his form immediately upon moving to another team. In the long run he may be doing the Devils a favor by keeping his AAV way down on his next contract.
I don't understand what you are talking about "mistake "... Hockey Reference literally only shows offensive zone and defensive zone starts.Again, that is just what his Ozone start percentage is and then combines neutral zone and defensive zone starts into the other column. Attached are Mercer’s zone starts by zone when you consider the neutral zone as separate from the defensive zone (which even you can’t argue are analogous in any way).
TLDR: Mercer doesn’t start in the dzone 60% and @JimEIV can’t admit to a mistake.
Neutral zone bro- does it exist?I quite easily showed you that I was right about your use of stats. Are you going to ignore that I have explained why you used the wrong number?I don't understand what you are talking about "mistake "... Hockey Reference literally only shows offensive zone and defensive zone starts.
They're looking at the ratio between Ozone and Dzone starts...why is this so hard for you to understand?
Ok now watch the game...you made me miss the Lazar save
We are not saying the same thing hereNeutral zone bro- does it exist?
Even in the face of obvious evidence against this you repeated it again.We are not saying the same thing here
We are not talking about total starts....Nobody cares about neutral zone...we are looking at the ratio between offensive zone starts and defensive zone starts.
If you want to make argument that that's a very small amount of the starts or that it's meaningless, fine ..but looking Ozone and Dzone is some indication of who the coach wants out in those situations
Mercer's ratio between Ozone and Dzone is 40/60.
You're thick headed...what is being shown here?Even in the face of obvious evidence against this you repeated it again.
Completely unserious and self serving, sad that instead of admitting you made a mistake you double down and blame the source instead of operator error.
It’s ok to admit you made a mistake
Even in the face of obvious evidence against this you repeated it again.
Completely unserious and self serving, sad that instead of admitting you made a mistake you double down and blame the source instead of operator error.
It’s ok to admit you made a mistake
My brother I literally explained this to you already:You're thick headed...what is being shown here?
View attachment 997692
Do you want the link to check for yourself?
![]()
2024-25 New Jersey Devils Roster, Stats, Injuries, Scores, Results, Shootouts | Hockey-Reference.com
Check out the latest New Jersey Devils Roster, Stats, Injuries, Scores, Results, Shootouts and more on Hockey-Reference.comwww.hockey-reference.com
I am not a lawyer, I only participated in a few pre-law classes but I have the requisite vocabulary to sound officialLegal argument devolving into accusations of being unserious and self serving? Are you really my wife?
That can't be correct ...My brother I literally explained this to you already:
Hockey reference takes Ozone start% and just calculates all other as Dzone. A shit ton of those are actually neutral zone (which would be obvious to anyone with a brain) but even after posting real zone start numbers you think 60 is still real?
That can't be correct ...
Here are Mercers real 5v5 numbers
Ozone 113
Neutral 182
Dzone 159
Total 454 starts
If Hockey Reference calculated neutral and Dzone as Dzone starts it would be 75% Dzone (Nzone + Dzone = 341 by 454 )
Now Hockey Reference is doing EV not 5v5 so these are going to be slightly different...
Counting just ozone and Dzone is 272 total
113/272 is 41.5
159/272 is 58.4
The slight difference in numbers is EV vs 5v5.
Hence 40/60...
Hockey Reference is counting ONLY Ozone and Dzone starts at even strength.
159 Dzone starts out 272 offensive and defensive zone is 58.4 at 5v5... and the numbers are 60% at Even Strength.keeps posting the same exact stat I say is useless. Here are his natural stat trick zone starts, which includes the neutral zone because no one who actually knows puck thinks that the neutral zone counts as the defensive zone.
None of these numbers will ever be 60% - I’m sorry that you can’t admit a mistake because it’s a really easy way to show you are a serious debater and not someone just arguing to an agenda.