NJDfan86
Registered User
- Dec 29, 2021
- 747
- 1,062
I still mostly align with Jim here. To me it’s the ordinal ranking and magnitude that’s interesting, not the exact number. The fact that Mercer has way more of his OZ+DZ shifts starting in the DZ relative to other fwd’s on this team is meaningful. Whether it’s 60 or 58 or 90 the fact that it’s 10-20% more than the teams top six FWDs is an important takeaway
If you think about it as 60% of his OZ+DZ starts are in the DZ it certainly shows they trust him more as a defensive forward even recognizing that a lot of starts stats lose meaning due to NZ and mid-play line changes.
Also, it’s not like he plays 1000 shifts and 900 of them were in NZ or run of play. And even if they were in the run of play those changes can only happen in certain moments (you’re not going to get a change when you’re stuck in the DZ) so I wouldn’t put too much stake into those numbers missing from this figure.
This reminds me of people who bash +/- because it doesn’t account for special teams and it’s reflective of team play, etc.. Sure if you use it to say Dillon is so much worse now because his +/- last year in Winnipeg was 10 points higher (e.g.) then yes I think it’s an inappropriate conclusion. But, if you say “Kovacevic is +10 higher than XYZ while playing more defensive shifts and against higher QoC” to imply he’s more of a net positive at 5on5 then that has real merit.
It is exactly like this—Going into last night he had 115 oz, 183 nz, 162 dz, and 749 on the fly.