TrufleShufle
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2012
- 8,509
- 14,371
You didn't help, you said outrageous stuff and then more.... very weird.... but alright.happy to help!
You didn't help, you said outrageous stuff and then more.... very weird.... but alright.happy to help!
I'm still not sure why you want to trade Nemac straight up for a 4c.Unintentionally or not, people seem to be misunderstanding my posts on the subject, so I shall type very clearly, and re-hash what I've said, so as to avoid annoying rhetorical one-offs.
-We need centers. Fact. Period. Our organizational center depth sucks at the prospect ranks and the AHL. We have a plethora of wingers to call up and that are marinating in other leagues, same with defensemen and goalies. We have like two centers in our system total and the best projections have one of them maybe being a 3C in like 5 years.
-Getting a better center than Haula would be nothing but a positive for team with deep playoff run aspirations. Can't honestly see why people are arguing with that, but sure, who am I to judge.
-Not saying that Nemec is the piece to get us these centers, but RD is our true position of strength in both numbers and quality, so that'd probably be the position that gets mined if players/prospects have to go the other way to facilitate this.
Also, the bottom 6 C UFA crop this coming offseason is the best it's been in a WHILE. I don't think it's a coincidence that fitz filled every other position for termYour front office should be competent enough to add “center depth” without trading one of the most valuable defensive pieces in the league. I would sooner trade Dawson Mercer to do that over Nemec.
We could use some center depth in Utica and maybe a guy that can handle C duties better than Mercer as emergency depth. But you can afford to not have great organizational depth at C when you have the best top 6 C situation the franchise has ever had by 1000 miles.
If you draft a guy at 2nd overall it's because you think he can be a franchise cornerstone. Unless we're getting something like a Will Smith mentioned above then I don't really see anything that makes sense. (But I don't see any team wanting to do that)
Regardless Nemec is currently giving us some of the best D depth in the league. I think even now he's good enough to start on a majority of NHL teams. Plus with how good Luke has looked under Keefe I really want to see Nemec under him with a proper complimentary partner.
After seeing Kraken tonight what about Nemec for Matty BeniersOnly way you trade Nemec for a center is if they're close in age and the team gets a better prospect. I know Will Smith has played wing this year so that argument is kinda dead even if SJ gets Hagens but that's someone I'd trade Nemec for if SJ wants to trade again lol
Nobody is arguing trading Nemec for a depth piece, the argument is trading him for a similar caliber young forward that can bring immediate help in a bottom 6 role/middle 6 role, that can be a major impact forward in the future.Your front office should be competent enough to add “center depth” without trading one of the most valuable defensive pieces in the league. I would sooner trade Dawson Mercer to do that over Nemec.
We could use some center depth in Utica and maybe a guy that can handle C duties better than Mercer as emergency depth. But you can afford to not have great organizational depth at C when you have the best top 6 C situation the franchise has ever had by 1000 miles.
Not sure where the devils are fitting another 7+ million dollar player on the rosterAfter seeing Kraken tonight what about Nemec for Matty Beniers
I seriously did not know he was making that much. Yeah that doesnt workNot sure where the devils are fitting another 7+ million dollar player on the roster
is a player-for-player trade with Kovacevic a possibility?
I understand we love him and we love the defensive depth we have, but the abundance of defensive depth looks a little bit silly when your bottom 4-5 forwards look like… *gestures wildly*
Mason MacTavish?Nemec for Logan Cooley?
Is Bastian coming back supposed to make me feel better about the bottom half of our offense? Because oh god.It's not a possibility, and the Devils' bottom 4-5 forwards are fine for now. Bastian should be back in less than 2 weeks.
One thing that everyone seems to be missing is that the Devils have almost no cap space and switching Kovacevic for Nemec would cost almost $150k in cap space that they barely have (meaning the forward they acquire has to be very inexpensive, which most are not). They can LTIR Lazar to create a bit more but that's going to start to get complicated once Lazar has to come off.
Makes no sense to trade him. It would make a spot for Casey or Nemec sure but it could throw things off big time. Casey and Nemec are where they should be right now. Nemec needs to start to find his offensive game again down there too.is a player-for-player trade with Kovacevic a possibility?
I understand we love him and we love the defensive depth we have, but the abundance of defensive depth looks a little bit silly when your bottom 4-5 forwards look like… *gestures wildly*