Top dollar in the Swiss league and league minimum isn’t that different if you are someone at the end of your career where role and lifestyle is probably more of a concern.
Jack and Quinn working on new sponsorships lol
Where's Luke??? is he still alive !!!!
Jack and Quinn working on new sponsorships lol
That 95 cup win saved them. Nashville got their team not long after that. Just not our Devils!Those were the days, my friend, when McMullen reached out and bought them and moved them to NJ and later threatened to move them to Nashville. I know you remember. Now, the team is close to being a Cup contender with a few adjustments to the offense. A creative deal could be made to sell just the team and maybe proceeds from the Pru revenue. Just saying. Not what I want. I want Harris to support Fitz to get the players we need to boost the offense. I know you want the same. So we agree glenwo2.
I would have brought Tatar back for league minimum. Only for the 4th line though.That's a little rough, even if he didn't produce Tatar gave it his all every night on the ice and was a great locker room presence.
Let's keep stating obvious things like some players need/deserve a NMC. Duh. However, it should be common sense that when you "hand them out like candy", including to depth/aging players, you drastically limit your roster flexibility if things go sideways. Spare me the NMC knocks a mil or 2 off the cap hit. BS. Palat, Kovacevic, and Haula got full NMCs for the majority of their contracts. Do tell what discount the Devs got on any of those players. I'll wait. Seems more like either players need to be dragged to play in NJ or Fitz, as an ex player, is giving players what he would want in their shoes.
As for solid players like Hamilton and Pesce, sure, NMC might be needed. However, Devs definitely didn't get a discount on either one. And the 10 team trade list is absurd for Hamilton (downright malpractice for Palat). When you are talking big cap hits, that's effectively a full NMC for the duration if your team is competitive.
Good and competitive GMs do not hand out several majority term NMCs to (older) depth players. End of story. You know you guys could actually look this up yourselves, right? The Devs have a relatively absurd amount of restrictive clauses on players that don't f'n move the needle. But go on, tell me it won't be and isn't a problem just like some of ya same folks did when Palat signed his restrictive contract. No biggie.
Devs full NMC or pseudo NMC due to restrictions this past season: Palat, Hamilton (I can understand to a degree), Haula (finally drops to 6 this offseason), Pesce, Meier, Bratt (idc), Markstrom (idc), Allen? (gone), and now Kovacevic.
Panthers for comparison: hysterically have less NMCs, including none to depth players...because they aren't morons. Even Reinhart is a 16 teamer right now, so is Bob. Jones at $7 through age 34 is minimal risk. Forsling through 32 at $5.7 is solid too. This maintains flexibility in the cap era.
Bottom line: Fitz' stupid overuse of NMCs or heavily restricted contracts literally just screwed the Devils this past season. It's why they had ZERO forward depth. They couldn't move Palat and Haula. Yet some of you wanna pretend this isn't an issue (and Fitz just did it again with Kovy). Alrighty.
Did I miss something relating to selling the team?So we're moving back to Kansas City, I see.![]()
Did I miss something relating to selling the team?
I know it's early in the offseason but I have to do it. Was browsing hockeydb, as one does, and man... that 2014 draft may be the single biggest piece of shit I've ever seen. 6 picks, almost a full draft's worth, and a total of 46 NHL games combined between those picks. Marian Studenic alone has as many NHL games as that draft.
And now we wait
View attachment 1042857
But now we’ve gotten to see Kovacevic play more without Siegenthaler and I feel like the Devils got him for at least fair market value or for a discount.Kovacevic was mostly bad cause it was premature before we saw him without Siegs being his flotation device and Fitz boxed himself in on D panicking over Nemec’s off year.
Did I miss something relating to selling the team?
But now we’ve gotten to see Kovacevic play more without Siegenthaler and I feel like the Devils got him for at least fair market value or for a discount.
I think there is definitely a world where he gets $5.5 or $6 million if he’s a UFA this offseason; there is just that much money floating around.
So we are saying it’s bad because it was premature but the flip side is that it was shrewd because Fitz correctly bought early; at least that’s how it looks now. Fitz took the gamble and right now it looks good.
Jack and Quinn working on new sponsorships lol
I think Carolina may be a better example as they subtly blamed being down 1-2 defenseman as an effectively insurmountable obstacle.I know Keefe and Fitz were a little smug about blaming injuries for the Devils struggles. They went as far as to use Dallas as a prime example for overcoming injuries. Looks likes hindsight is kicking ass again.
Long story short, it’s nearly impossible to overcome injuries for long periods. It’s team chemistry. It trying to get guys back into the lineup (who aren’t in game shape or 100%). It’s the players forced to play about their limits (some times for long stretches). Dallas looks gassed. and with the Cats injuries this is probably the Oilers revenge tour.
Because it's easier to change reality than change someone's opinions, no matter how stupid.Bill Zito gave Carter Verhaege a NMC not even a year ago lol as mentioned, Bob wasn't even able to be moved a few years ago because of his clauses
why do people just invent their own history?