Devils discussion (news, notes and speculation) - draft and FA edition | Page 16 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Devils discussion (news, notes and speculation) - draft and FA edition

I like Glass, I hope we sign him but “legit one of the best defensive centers in the league “? This cannot be a basis for a serious discussion.
Seems like a lot of these 4th liners have strong defensive numbers in these models then some of these people just cite those models outputs as being definitive evidence for actual performance.
 
Seems like a lot of these 4th liners have strong defensive numbers in these models then some of these people just cite those models outputs as being definitive evidence for actual performance.
Bingo. There are dozens of players with similar super-duper highly advanced chart scores / profiles that are out of the NHL already in their 20s. But those folks won't tell ya that because ignorance is bliss.
 


Doesn't mean he won't be back, obviously

GASP, but wait! I was assured he was a capable 3C and was worth qualifying for the Devs! Of course in reality, the most C needy team in the league isn't even gonna qualify him. I rest my case.
 
I mean they could sign him a a cheaper deal than the QO, correct? If they don't this makes the move for him and Dumoulin even more shitty when you consider the cost. Sure Stillman sucks balls and Graham is probably going to be nothing but he was just drafted and we gave up a third as well.
 
The Devils could have no centers (which they literally don't right now) behind Jack/Nico and they still wouldn't be the most needy team in the league behind, people are oblivious to the rest of the league when they post the woe is me bullshit
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and Triumph
GASP, but wait! I was assured he was a capable 3C and was worth qualifying for the Devs! Of course in reality, the most C needy team in the league isn't even gonna qualify him. I rest my case.

You're just completely blinkered. The Devils have not qualified a lot of 'bottom 6' players over the years, including both McLeod and Bastian twice. I just told you today they weren't going to qualify him.

This means nothing at all about whether or not Glass will be in a Devils' uniform in October.
 
GASP, but wait! I was assured he was a capable 3C and was worth qualifying for the Devs! Of course in reality, the most C needy team in the league isn't even gonna qualify him. I rest my case.
There’s a classic meme, that I won’t post here because it uses some, shall we say, archaic and uncouth terminology.

But “I was only pretending to be an idiot” isn’t going to end up being quite the defense you think it is.
 
There’s a classic meme, that I won’t post here because it uses some, shall we say, archaic and uncouth terminology.

But “I was only pretending to be an idiot” isn’t going to end up being quite the defense you think it is.

What are you taking about? I’ve been getting away with that for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guadana
Bingo. There are dozens of players with similar super-duper highly advanced chart scores / profiles that are out of the NHL already in their 20s. But those folks won't tell ya that because ignorance is bliss.
Huingo.
Ice time 5 on 5 + faceoffs turn into SF% and xGF%
Ducks Lundestrom sf 43% gf40%
Bruins Beecher 44/45 Kastelic 45/40
Buf Krebs 48/46
Car Drury and Jost have 51+ and 54+ but both players were last/near last in center's team charts, Glass was on top.
CBJ Kuraly 48/48
Clg Rooney 48/44
Chi Kaurashev 44/41
Col Drury 54/50 Kelly 51/50 both are 4th/5th in categories
Dal Steel 49/50 Blackwell 50/51
Det Rasmussen 46/48
Edm Janmark 48/46 Ryan 50/47
Flo Boqvist 49/50
I don't need to post it more. All of them don't have not as good numbers as Glass aside Canes, all of them are 3rd or 4th or lower centers on charts with their numbers. Not near the best on team charts as Glass.

Glass was good as Pitts center as Devils center. And even saved his on ice clean impact even after the injury.


Seems like a lot of these 4th liners have strong defensive numbers in these models then some of these people just cite those models outputs as being definitive evidence for actual performance.
Like we see - no.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad