Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 52,523
- 46,252
Fitz has to have a pretty damn good feeling Timo would re-sign. At the worst, you get that first in a trade flip at the draft and you can pick his destination so he doesn't wind up signing in the East.
Fitz wouldn't have done this move if he wasn't 99% sure he'd re-sign Timo. His whole MO is getting players who fit the timeline for the long-term and don't destroy the future.Fitz has to have a pretty damn good feeling Timo would re-sign. At the worst, you get that first in a trade flip at the draft and you can pick his destination so he doesn't wind up signing in the East.
I mean that would have worried me without the trade lol, but now at least they have a pretty good chance of having ONE of these guys here past next yearI’m not worried in the slightest about Meier flaking on an extension here. I think he will be more than happy to do it.
It’s Bratt that worries me down the road lol
If the conditions aren't met it'll turn into a 2nd or 3rd or something like that. I'd imagine the conditions are either us making the ECF or SCF.I missed it, what's the condition? And what happens if the condition is not met?
The pressure is on to sign him now. Hope that doesn't lead to him giving him more than he should. Also even if you do then you better be f***ing prepared to give up the same exact deal to Bratt or you gave up all this shit to end up back in square one
Which means Fitz just gave Meier a blank check since NJ can’t really not sign him now. Hopefully they had some preliminary discussion so the basic parameters are known.Too much for a rental, a steal if not...this hinges on whether we sign him or not
Apparently the conditional ‘24 1st is tied into how far devils go in this years playoffs??
We should be in a position where we're really not adding a lot next year, or if we do maybe then Holtz or Casey goes.The 2024 first is a really big problem because it wont be around for a deadline deal next year.
So use the 2025The 2024 first is a really big problem because it wont be around for a deadline deal next year.
How is the trade not final
I would have preferred to move Holtz over Zetterlund and Bahl over Okhotiuk, but if those are the guys SJ wanted then you make that trade every time.
Sharks would be over the contract limit. We'll have to take one more back.How is the trade not final
You gonna go flex on the main board? The Timo thread was basically calling you crazy for saying no Mercer/Luke/Nemec.I think they'll get the same deal, I'm not worried tbh lol. Sad about Zetterlund + Muk but it is what it is