ULF_55
Moderator
This was his measurement at the NHL Combine.
- Ben Danford: 6-foot-1.5, 191 pounds.
Off season weight and height loss.
Happens every July 1st.
This was his measurement at the NHL Combine.
- Ben Danford: 6-foot-1.5, 191 pounds.
I'm interested to see how Jacob Quillan looks at the prospects camp. He'll probably need a year+ with the Marlies at least, but he's interesting as a two-way right handed center that was the second best college UDFA last year. If he turns into Bozak but on the 3rd or 4th line that's a win. I think he's more physical than Bozak though, so that's a plus.
Cade looks like a beast .. huge .. blocked a shot on a 3 on 2 and then followed puck and destroyed forward into wall .. looks like a mean son of a gun .. this is exactly what we need .. he does look a little slow so he has to play his angles .. but you cant teach mean or size
Cade Weber is going to get a workout.Looks as though they're stacking one side to see who stands out on the lesser side.
Could be wrong but looks that way.
That us what thought as wellLooks as though they're stacking one side to see who stands out on the lesser side.
Could be wrong but looks that way.
Yeah. I like that he's not perimeter oriented. Gets a lot of tips and rebounds.Kid seems to like the ice near the net.
Danford think Muzzin. Cowan think Tucker. Not bad.Damn I was hoping this would be an article telling me Danford is literally Chara and Cowen is a mix of Tom Wilson and Hyman
He is in. He is a leader. You don't get rid of those guys.Good for Muzzin hope he gets a job with the team (which it looks like he will) He was an absolute warrior for us and did everything that was asked of him. Unfortunately the concussions caught up to him and forced him to retire.
Cade looks like a beast .. huge .. blocked a shot on a 3 on 2 and then followed puck and destroyed forward into wall .. looks like a mean son of a gun .. this is exactly what we need .. he does look a little slow so he has to play his angles .. but you cant teach mean or size
It sounds like he will have a great AHL career.
Slow D who don't move well don't often make it to the NHL and succeed.
Just for reference, he is Robertson's draft, he is not super young and is now in his D+5 I believe.
Young enough, but he has to figure things out quickly.
I'm looking for a scouting report that says he's slow.
I've read about 4 that say skating in a straight line is fine and his skating is decent for a player his size.
I would suspect he is no waterbug.
I just read this article on Cade, doesn’t seem to be a slow skater. In fact he skates well in straight lines and has “above average agility in open ice”.
A Capfriendly scouting report grades him a B+ and projects him for the third pair. They state his skating has “matured” in college. They rated his skating 79.
Why are you dissing this guy? Not a Dubas pickup? Do you have the information others don’t?
He was also traded for a 6th 5 years after his draft and when he was closer to a finished product... I think the team trading him had knowledge of who he was and deemed a 6th was worth more. Maybe the trade will blow up in their face, just saying, that was the value assigned to him from the team that drafted him.
I'd just like to see more tape to get a better idea of the player he is, but from what I saw and what I read, I am unimpressed with a D first player who spends a lot of time blocking shots in his own end and struggles to do more than make a first pass and can't put up any points.
Kind of like the Jets saying McGroarty isn't NHL ready.
Right?
Your point about what he was traded for is well taken. However, it wouldn't be the first time a team gave up on a prospect and the prospect went on to become a solid NHL'er.I'm more concerned with his puck skills and decision making.
"His puck playing ability is limited to basic passes, and he struggles when he goes beyond that."
This was a real quote about him.
I think being able to make passes is important, maybe others don't, not sure.
He is a prospect, that is fine, but he is just getting a lot of hype and I don't see it.
I've tried to find more tape on him but have seen very little, if you have more, please send it, I'd love to be wrong.
He was also traded for a 6th 5 years after his draft and when he was closer to a finished product... I think the team trading him had knowledge of who he was and deemed a 6th was worth more. Maybe the trade will blow up in their face, just saying, that was the value assigned to him from the team that drafted him.
I'd just like to see more tape to get a better idea of the player he is, but from what I saw and what I read, I am unimpressed with a D first player who spends a lot of time blocking shots in his own end and struggles to do more than make a first pass and can't put up any points.
Your point about what he was traded for is well taken. However, it wouldn't be the first time a team gave up on a prospect and the prospect went on to become a solid NHL'er.
From what I've read, he has improved this year in many aspects of his game. In that Capfriendly scouting report he's gone from a D+ to a B+ prospect. As for your comment about being able to make passes, dobberprospects.com reported in May that despite being a pure defensive defenceman, he can "move the puck quickly out of his own end". I assume that means he can make a good pass.
I have no illusions that he's going to be a top 4 d-man, but it sounds like he has the potential to be a solid shot-blocking 5/6 defenceman.
![]()
Cade Webber Scouting Report - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Cade Webber scouting report powered by The Pro Hockey Groupwww.capfriendly.com
Cade Webber said he was watching a lot of Jani Hakanpaa tape in the prospects interview earlier this week in developing as a defensive defenseman. Both are 6'7" monsters.
Fact is, when you're talking about a shot blocking, cycle busting, net front clearing type of D, a lot of the verbiage about skill, IQ and puck moving ability is not going to be that relevant because if he had high end puck transporting, offensive upside and elite wheels he'd be the next Victor Hedman.
Your point about what he was traded for is well taken. However, it wouldn't be the first time a team gave up on a prospect and the prospect went on to become a solid NHL'er.
From what I've read, he has improved this year in many aspects of his game. In that Capfriendly scouting report he's gone from a D+ to a B+ prospect. As for your comment about being able to make passes, dobberprospects.com reported in May that despite being a pure defensive defenceman, he can "move the puck quickly out of his own end". I assume that means he can make a good pass.
I have no illusions that he's going to be a top 4 d-man, but it sounds like he has the potential to be a solid shot-blocking 5/6 defenceman.
![]()
Cade Webber Scouting Report - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Cade Webber scouting report powered by The Pro Hockey Groupwww.capfriendly.com
The fact that he wasn't going to sign with Carolina also affected his cost.I'm more concerned with his puck skills and decision making.
"His puck playing ability is limited to basic passes, and he struggles when he goes beyond that."
This was a real quote about him.
I think being able to make passes is important, maybe others don't, not sure.
He is a prospect, that is fine, but he is just getting a lot of hype and I don't see it.
I've tried to find more tape on him but have seen very little, if you have more, please send it, I'd love to be wrong.
He was also traded for a 6th 5 years after his draft and when he was closer to a finished product... I think the team trading him had knowledge of who he was and deemed a 6th was worth more. Maybe the trade will blow up in their face, just saying, that was the value assigned to him from the team that drafted him.
I'd just like to see more tape to get a better idea of the player he is, but from what I saw and what I read, I am unimpressed with a D first player who spends a lot of time blocking shots in his own end and struggles to do more than make a first pass and can't put up any points.