Kunzle
He does indeed. Mike Künzle is a really big guy as well. Looks promising.Really caught my attention. Seemed to be doing all the little things right.
He does indeed. Mike Künzle is a really big guy as well. Looks promising.
PS: Carter Verhaeghe is looking like a steal imo.
I really liked what Dennis Robertson was doing without the puck. He seemed to track back well, and had an active stick. When he got the puck, however, he seemed to not know how to make the smart play, which can be ironed out, but overall, I liked the way he played.
Gauthier looked pretty good. Not much offense generated, but he took his big body to the net, tied up sticks in front, in an effort to allow shots to reach the net. He was as advertised; always being hard on the back check, and the very active stick. His defensive awareness is off the charts.
Rielly is a fun player to watch, but as some mentioned, as good as he is at slicing through a group of players, he does get a little cute at the blueline at times. He's a special player, who needs to iron out a few wrinkles, but we're lucky to have such a player.
I personally really liked Knodel. Very noticeable and seems like he's coming along really well.
I didn't like R. Ruperts effort on some plays. Seemed like he was floating on some plays and not really trying hard to get the loose pucks. He had a couple nice hits though, but if there was one guy that caught my eye in a bad way, it was him.
I find it kind of hard to judge some prospects in these tourneys that are known for tough play... Broll was an exception because he clearly did not give a frank.
But a lot of them know who they are playing against and the fact that its a crucial training time, and no one wants to hurt somebody. It works against them because they ease off as a result.
I find it kind of hard to judge some prospects in these tourneys that are known for tough play... Broll was an exception because he clearly did not give a frank.
But a lot of them know who they are playing against and the fact that its a crucial training time, and no one wants to hurt somebody. It works against them because they ease off as a result.
Oh I'm not being overly critical, just thought he caught my eye on some bad plays, when I checked the number, his name came up more than a few times.
There's a variety of reasons why some do great or poor or anything in between.
Olden looked great in the prospect camps and scrimmages. Didn't really turn into much. So it's not the best tool to evaluate prospects as a whole.
It would be great if Broll destroyed Rielly!
Right?
Catch 22.
Not sure what you are getting at, I wasnt advocating Broll... He injured Finn and thats not a good thing. He looked impressive but IMO he was playing quite a bit harder than several other prospects.
Very true. He prospered in the lessened intensity. I still like him as a player, but he is just not long for NA.
Not sure what you are getting at, I wasnt advocating Broll... He injured Finn and thats not a good thing. He looked impressive but IMO he was playing quite a bit harder than several other prospects.
I haven't seen much of him, but I didn't miss him. I just don't put much stock in good-but-not great USHL players, especially ones without standout speed or size.
Any injury report on Matt Finn?
I personally really liked Knodel. Very noticeable and seems like he's coming along really well.
I didn't like R. Ruperts effort on some plays. Seemed like he was floating on some plays and not really trying hard to get the loose pucks. He had a couple nice hits though, but if there was one guy that caught my eye in a bad way, it was him.