Playing the minutes of a number one D on a bad team doesn’t default a player into being a true number one D..Larkin plays the role of a one C, but is he actually a one C on a good team?
Imo Yzerman did the best (or close to it) he could in his drafts. He got good players, but he didn’t get the key difference makers.
Rather than getting caught up in exact labels or trying to rank 1-32, how about recognizing that Seider is a difference maker, and though it is very early (and I don't like what this staff has done to Seider's game) but Edvinsson looks like he might be even better.
Last edited: