Detroit Redwings Downfall

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dbarthnek96
  • Start date Start date
lol what.
2008 was the first time Washington made the postseason with their “core”

There were like 3 players still left from that team when they won a decade later

Do you think them making the post season in 2008 had any single relevance to winning the Cup in 2018? Yes or no?

If no, then why would the Wings making the post season this year have any single relevance to them being contenders in the future ?
 
Their franchise players were more like Eichel, Stone, Pietrangelo, Theodore imo. Guys like Marchessault and DeBrincat are of course nice additional pieces when you have more of that foundation there.
So just like Larkin, Raymond, Ed and Seider are our main pieces with Debrincat being an additional piece? What’s the issue here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavels Dog
So just like Larkin, Raymond, Ed and Seider are our main pieces with Debrincat being an additional piece? What’s the issue here?
Not sure your question. I’d reckon DeBrincat is a nice medium term piece to help get the wings to the playoffs. Solid contract, worth the late first they got for Bertuzzi? Probably if they accomplish their goal. I can’t tell from dotter and others if that’s what the wings are trying to do or not given the refusal to give an inch to anything other than Yzerman being perfect.
 
2008 was the first time Washington made the postseason with their “core”

There were like 3 players still left from that team when they won a decade later

Do you think them making the post season in 2008 had any single relevance to winning the Cup in 2018? Yes or no?

If no, then why would the Wings making the post season this year have any single relevance to them being contenders in the future ?
Washington spent a decade as a competitive team going through various trials and tribulations together, determining which pieces worked and which could use an upgrade in the postseason and with enough re-tooling and bites of the apple it came together for the one postseason. How does that speak to postseason experience being irrelevant? Most cup winners had their share of growing pains along the way.
 
Their franchise players were more like Eichel, Stone, Pietrangelo, Theodore imo. Guys like Marchessault and DeBrincat are of course nice additional pieces when you have more of that foundation there.
Their "additional piece" who was part of their team since inception and became one of their core players and won the Conn Smythe ahead of all of those "Franchise players".
 
Their "additional piece" who was part of their team since inception and became one of their core players and won the Conn Smythe ahead of all of those "Franchise players".
Are you saying Marchessault was a more important part of their team? Like take that further for me. Should they have tried to trade Eichel and re-sign Marchessault because he won the Conn Smythe?
 
Recent Cup winners Vegas, and Florida traded (and signed UFAs) to get those key guys.
There's a time for everything. Most of Florida's bigger moves (Bennett, Reinhart, Tkachuk) came when they were already a playoff team and trying to take another step. It should also be noted that some of their moves were pure necessity because their own drafting sucked. Their 1st rounders after Barkov (2013) and Ekblad (2014):

Lawson Crouse
Henrik Borgström
Owen Tippet
Grigori Denisenko


Yeah, if everyone we drafted after Raymond looked like a bust there would be less patience among Detroit fans and more need to start aggressively trading.
 
Are you saying Marchessault was a more important part of their team?
For their cup win, his trophy speaks for itself.
And it was between him and Hill to win it.
The others had less cases. Not saying they were not important, but that is how it played out.
Should they have tried to trade Eichel and re-sign Marchessault because he won the Conn Smythe?
What they should try and not try is not up to me. You are talking about after they won a cup. These things doesn't have to be connected. They could have done a lot of different options, they decided one thing.

Then people can agree or not agree if the path they have taken was the right decision.

Both answers could be correct. In the same way Colorado traded Rantanen cause of issues with re-signing and also them wanting to become a deeper team. Doesn't mean Rantanen wasn't lets say a top 3 important player on that team prior to getting traded away.
 
He absolutely does and you are losing all your credibility posting this patently false thing over and over. Maybe he wasn’t a play driver in Ottawa - fine. This year in Detroit he absolutely is and there’s zero argument against that.
I've read your content in here I am not worried about your opinion on my credibility. Seems like you're copeing with a dissapointing season of a team that's not built properly. For exactly the reasons I pointed out. As per my first post, I think Yzerman just needs to be patient and let the d core develop. They do need to find another center that can drive play. If they have that they will be a playoff team.
 
Their franchise players were more like Eichel, Stone, Pietrangelo, Theodore imo. Guys like Marchessault and DeBrincat are of course nice additional pieces when you have more of that foundation there.
Marchessesult doesnt drive a line either just like Debrincat he's a complimentary piece. A team built like Vegas can have that when they are deep down the middle and have a heavy physical team. Also when they pay him 5 million. Detroit is light up the middle, doesn't have a heavy team and pays Debrincat just under 8 million. It's not a recipe for success.
 
So... just to be clear. When did the downfall occur that this thread is mentioning? Is it this season or last? Or just all the of the last 6 seasons? or maybe 8+ if we consider missing the playoffs. I can understand the debate about the team build and if they are building the right way vs wrong. That is controversial and is amongst the fan base itself. Still not sure when the downfall happened. Point increase for 5 years straight followed by a bump in the road when they added more youth and the young core players took on bigger roles.
 
Last edited:
Also when they pay him 5 million. Detroit is light up the middle, doesn't have a heavy team and pays Debrincat just under 8 million. It's not a recipe for success.
5 years in between those contract signings, they in many ways similar when it comes to production. 5 years later cap gone up and knowingly going up by quite a bit on know roughly how much it will increase now. His increase in salary isn't so much either compared to what he had.

It's hard to argue that DeBrincat is overpaid. If anything every so slightly because of less leverage from Detroit side as they traded for him and being in an overall worse standing. You kind of have to accept that he might be getting half a million to much unless he performs to a certain standard or above all the time.

So when they don't do anything people complain, and when they do, people complain. Make it make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan
I've read your content in here I am not worried about your opinion on my credibility. Seems like you're copeing with a dissapointing season of a team that's not built properly. For exactly the reasons I pointed out. As per my first post, I think Yzerman just needs to be patient and let the d core develop. They do need to find another center that can drive play. If they have that they will be a playoff team.
I don’t disagree with your other points. I’m also not coping at all - you can ask other wings fans, I’m among the most critical of Yzerman in our board and I think he’s an overall below average GM. But all that’s irrelevant to this point. Alex Debrincat is objectively a play driver. End of story.
 
This is like vaccine denial at this point. No, that’s not the issue with Detroit. At all. The problem is the depth is horrible and AHL tier because Yzerman keeps signing terrible free agents. The problem is not franchise 1D Seider, which, yes, is exactly what he is.
Arguing about what is a franchise player is semantics, and whether Seider is that is a subjective opinion. Let's assume you are biased here. Here's an unbiased, alledgedly not perfect list, but one that gives us a point of reference : https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-current-players-ranked-top-20-defensemen.

Seider is the 20th ranked defensemen in the league. He turns 24 in a few days. At this point, we can say he'll be a career league-average number 1 defensemen, which is great! It's a super valuable core player any team would gladly take.

My point is, though, that if a team's best player is an average #1D, it's hard to envision that team being more than solidly in the middle of the pack. Contenders usually have one or many elite players that surpass that level. Barkov, Eichel, Makar, McKinnon, Hedman, Kucherov, etc. You get what I mean.

In my opinion, Detroit is still looking for that player and they likely wont find it either at pick 14 or pick 18. I don't see anyone on their roster or prospect pool with that kind of upside, but you never know. The Red Wings do have good talent, it's just that none of them screams superstar. Their current group's upside, when all is said and done, doesn't project as a top 5 or even 10 team in this very competitive league unless they hit a home-run.

You can make that argument about a lot of teams by the way! I think the Senators, the Habs (my team), the Blue Jackets and Utah are trending that way right now too. All of these teams arguably left the basement without a bona-fide superstar prospect. Time will tell if the likes of Demidov, Fantilli, Stutzle or Raymond can elevate their team to contender status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frobbo
Arguing about what is a franchise player is semantics, and whether Seider is that is a subjective opinion. Let's assume you are biased here. Here's an unbiased, alledgedly not perfect list, but one that gives us a point of reference : NHL Top Players: Top 20 Defensemen | NHL.com.

Seider is the 20th ranked defensemen in the league. He turns 24 in a few days. At this point, we can say he'll be a career league-average number 1 defensemen, which is great! It's a super valuable core player any team would gladly take.

My point is, though, that if a team's best player is an average #1D, it's hard to envision that team being more than solidly in the middle of the pack. Contenders usually have one or many elite players that surpass that level. Barkov, Eichel, Makar, McKinnon, Hedman, Kucherov, etc. You get what I mean.

In my opinion, Detroit is still looking for that player and they likely wont find it either at pick 14 or pick 18. I don't see anyone on their roster or prospect pool with that kind of upside, but you never know. The Red Wings do have good talent, it's just that none of them screams superstar. Their current group's upside, when all is said and done, doesn't project as a top 5 or even 10 team in this very competitive league unless they hit a home-run.

You can make that argument about a lot of teams by the way! I think the Senators, the Habs (my team), the Blue Jackets and Utah are trending that way right now too. All of these teams arguably left the basement without a bona-fide superstar prospect. Time will tell if the likes of Demidov, Fantilli, Stutzle or Raymond can elevate their team to contender status.
The fact that you posted this list without realizing that Seider is the youngest defenseman on it is quite telling. Yes, if he takes zero steps forward in his development, we won’t compete. Hes a top 20 dman now and still years away from his prime. Why would I have any reason to believe he’ll be anything less than a franchise 1D when he gets there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan
Arguing about what is a franchise player is semantics, and whether Seider is that is a subjective opinion. Let's assume you are biased here. Here's an unbiased, alledgedly not perfect list, but one that gives us a point of reference : NHL Top Players: Top 20 Defensemen | NHL.com.

Seider is the 20th ranked defensemen in the league. He turns 24 in a few days. At this point, we can say he'll be a career league-average number 1 defensemen, which is great! It's a super valuable core player any team would gladly take.

My point is, though, that if a team's best player is an average #1D, it's hard to envision that team being more than solidly in the middle of the pack. Contenders usually have one or many elite players that surpass that level. Barkov, Eichel, Makar, McKinnon, Hedman, Kucherov, etc. You get what I mean.

In my opinion, Detroit is still looking for that player and they likely wont find it either at pick 14 or pick 18. I don't see anyone on their roster or prospect pool with that kind of upside, but you never know. The Red Wings do have good talent, it's just that none of them screams superstar. Their current group's upside, when all is said and done, doesn't project as a top 5 or even 10 team in this very competitive league unless they hit a home-run.

You can make that argument about a lot of teams by the way! I think the Senators, the Habs (my team), the Blue Jackets and Utah are trending that way right now too. All of these teams arguably left the basement without a bona-fide superstar prospect. Time will tell if the likes of Demidov, Fantilli, Stutzle or Raymond can elevate their team to contender status.
Yeah Seider and Raymond are nice young players signed to decent contracts, but in a perfect world, pending a 2nd level breakout, they're pushed down a spot each in the total team hierarchy of overall important players. Like if they had a true superstar center, that would be huge as far as sliding everyone else down to a more appropriate placement on a contending team.
 
Edvinsson may end up being better than Seider. Yet to see what he can do with any power play time really. ASP is a prospect so he is still an unknown but the fact he can come onto a team that already has 3 young established defensemen ahead of him should only help ease him in. Johansson looks very solid and no question he is a positive addition. Outside those 4 they have a few guys who should at least get a chance to be regular NHL'ers... that is a bright future for the back end and I would argue top 5 to 10 potential long term.

Larkin is a really good player, not a star. Raymond is ahead of him already in my opinion and is on the cusp of being a "star". Kasper has been one of the top 5 to 7 rookies this season, especially if you could erase his misuse under Lalonde. I can see other fan bases not getting too hyped about Danielson, MBN, Buchelnikov but they all have legitimate upside. The forward group is likely where Yzerman needs to get creative via trade/free agency. Thankfully the future cap space is plentiful to make something happen, he has not tied the franchises hands in terms of being able to find space or prospects/picks to use if and when the right fit becomes available and the time is right. The forwards currently do not inspire much confidence but the future outlook is still bright once the dead weight is gone.

Goaltenders are a crapshoot but hard to argue against Detroit not having one of, if not the top pool in between the pipes. Cossa, Augustine and Guimond gives them 2 upper end prospects and 1 wait and see. Again thankfully after next season, the cap is wide open and so is the opportunity. Likely Cossa gets more than a handful of games next season as zero chance Talbot/Mrazek stay healthy if they even run it back with them as the tandem.

I don't see how Detroit isn't setting themselves up for success. All the bright spots outside Larkin are yet to enter their prime or even the league... will they be good enough to compete for a cup? I mean outside 4 or 5 teams, every team in the league has that same question. You have teams like Toronto, New Jersey, Carolina, Dallas, New York, Winnipeg and of course the Edmonton... all teams with varying degrees of the super stars that Detroit supposedly lacks and yet none of them have accomplished the ultimate goal.

There is more than one way to skin a cat and I don't see any exact step by step guide on how to get there that has worked time after time for different franchises.
 
Last edited:
The fact that you posted this list without realizing that Seider is the youngest defenseman on it is quite telling. Yes, if he takes zero steps forward in his development, we won’t compete. Hes a top 20 dman now and still years away from his prime. Why would I have any reason to believe he’ll be anything less than a franchise 1D when he gets there?
That is such a fanboy take.

Seider turns 24 in a few days. He's not really young anymore. Yes, some defensemen turn out to be late bloomers, but most have hit their prime by the time they turn 24, or at least they are close to it.

Can Seider take another step forward? Sure, but he's also stagnated ever since his amazing rookie season. Right now, I would not bet on him ever being a Norris winner.

The simple truth is this : the Red Wings aborted their tank before they had the chance to grab a good enough player to become an elite team.
 
That is such a fanboy take.

Seider turns 24 in a few days. He's not really young anymore. Yes, some defensemen turn out to be late bloomers, but most have hit their prime by the time they turn 24, or at least they are close to it.

Can Seider take another step forward? Sure, but he's also stagnated ever since his amazing rookie season. Right now, I would not bet on him ever being a Norris winner.

The simple truth is this : the Red Wings aborted their tank before they had the chance to grab a good enough player to become an elite team.

Seider has not stagnated. If you look at hockeydb, sure. He is a better defender than he was his rookie season and also better carrying the puck up the ice/breaking out. The whole team struggles to score 5v5, as they improve so will his point totals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown
That is such a fanboy take.

Seider turns 24 in a few days. He's not really young anymore. Yes, some defensemen turn out to be late bloomers, but most have hit their prime by the time they turn 24, or at least they are close to it.

Can Seider take another step forward? Sure, but he's also stagnated ever since his amazing rookie season. Right now, I would not bet on him ever being a Norris winner.

The simple truth is this : the Red Wings aborted their tank before they had the chance to grab a good enough player to become an elite team.
Playing the toughest minutes in the NHL doesn't seem help a players numbers very much.
 
Edvinsson may end up being better than Seider. Yet to see what he can do with any power play time really. ASP is a prospect so he is still an unknown but the fact he can come onto a team that already has 3 young established defensemen ahead of him should only help ease him in. Johansson looks very solid and no question he is a positive addition. Outside those 4 they have a few guys who should at least get a chance to be regular NHL'ers... that is a bright future for the back end and I would argue top 5 to 10 potential long term.

Larkin a really good player, not a star. Raymond is ahead of him already in my opinion and is on the cusp of being a "star". Kasper has been one of the top 5 to 7 rookies this season, especially if you could erase his misuse under Lalonde. I can see other fan bases not getting too hyped about Danielson, MBN, Buchelnikov but they all have legitimate upside. The forward group is likely where Yzerman needs to get creative via trade/free agency. Thankfully the future cap space is plentiful to make something happen, he has not tied the franchises hands in terms of being able to find space or prospects/picks to use if and when the right fit becomes available and the time is right. The forwards currently do not inspire much confidence but the future outlook is still bright once the dead weight is gone.

Goaltenders are a crapshoot but hard to argue against Detroit not having one of, if not the top pool in between the pipes. Cossa, Augustine and Guimond gives them 2 upper end prospects and 1 wait and see. Again thankfully after next season, the cap is wide open and so is the opportunity. Likely Cossa gets more than a handful of games next season as zero chance Talbot/Mrazek stay healthy if they even run it back with them as the tandem.

I don't see how Detroit isn't setting themselves up for success. All the bright spots outside Larkin are yet to enter their prime or even the league... will they be good enough to compete for a cup? I mean outside 4 or 5 teams, every team in the league has that same question. You have teams like Toronto, New Jersey, Carolina, Dallas, New York, Winnipeg and of course the Edmonton... all teams with varying degrees of the super stars that Detroit supposedly lacks and yet none of them have accomplished the ultimate goal.

There is more than one way to skin a cat and I don't see any exact step by step guide on how to get there that has worked time after time for different franchises.
Yes, there is more than one way to skin a cat, I just don’t see the Red Wings’ way doing it. They will need some more elite talent up front but that’s not easy to acquire.
 
24 is young for a D-man. Hell it's still pretty young for a forward.

That said, I agree with the fundamental notion. The Wings did basically fail at the rebuild because they neglected the golden rule of the rebuild - you don't rebuild for a set number of years, you rebuild until you have your elite core in place. They bailed on it because they wanted to sell tickets.
 
Not sure your question. I’d reckon DeBrincat is a nice medium term piece to help get the wings to the playoffs. Solid contract, worth the late first they got for Bertuzzi? Probably if they accomplish their goal. I can’t tell from dotter and others if that’s what the wings are trying to do or not given the refusal to give an inch to anything other than Yzerman being perfect.
Is a young 30+ goal scorer/65+pt guy worth a late 1st and scraps? Every single time.

This also all in response to a guy saying you’ll never win in the playoffs with guys like Debrincat, which is hilariously false
 
Marchessesult doesnt drive a line either just like Debrincat he's a complimentary piece. A team built like Vegas can have that when they are deep down the middle and have a heavy physical team. Also when they pay him 5 million. Detroit is light up the middle, doesn't have a heavy team and pays Debrincat just under 8 million. It's not a recipe for success.
They paid him $5M in a flat cap. Just around $8M is essentially the same now.
 

Ad

Ad