WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,700
For a guy that never had a 40 points season in 6 NHL seasons, I would say that it’s not a bargain either to say the least.Not bad at all.
Always sound logic when he's paced for 49 points twice over two shortened seasonsFor a guy that never had a 40 points season in 6 NHL seasons, I would say that it’s not a bargain either to say the least.
I don’t care he paced for it, I said he never had a 40 points season and I’m right. Hopefully his « intangibles » are worth the money. Otherwise it just look like Detroit overpaid for a 3rd liner.Always sound logic when he's paced for 49 points twice over two shortened seasons
I don’t know about TB but how many games did Mo play before the WSH trade?Does this contract make him more valuable? I guess the more important question is if Yzerman traded anyone in Tampa Bay soon after signing them to an extension, doesn’t seem like something he does. Maybe he will make an exception, I am not a big fan of Fabbri, would love if he could be part of a package to fill the gaping hole at Center.
I don't care if it's a pure fact that he didn't. It's a dumb argument when you can't show logic. You probably also feel McDavid *only* had a 100 point season, instead of one of the most offensively ridiculous seasons in the past 25 yearsI don’t care he paced for it, I said he never had a 40 points season and I’m right. Hopefully his « intangibles » are worth the money. Otherwise it just look like Detroit overpaid for a 3rd liner.
Well thats pretty terrible hope it works out Yzerman doesn't make many missteps
I don’t know about TB but how many games did Mo play before the WSH trade?
I know you don’t care about facts, since your « logic » isn’t based on what is observable but on projection. McDavid had 116,108 and 105 points season, thus showing he can be a 110+ player, doesnt mean he is a 150 points player until he proves he can do it. Fabbri has proven at his what should be peak offensive years to be an average third liner production wise, don’t see how that justify a 4M$ cap hit but you do you.I don't care if it's a pure fact that he didn't. It's a dumb argument when you can't show logic. You probably also feel McDavid *only* had a 100 point season, instead of one of the most offensively ridiculous seasons in the past 25 years
I don’t care he paced for it, I said he never had a 40 points season and I’m right. Hopefully his « intangibles » are worth the money. Otherwise it just look like Detroit overpaid for a 3rd liner.
For a guy that never had a 40 points season in 6 NHL seasons, I would say that it’s not a bargain either to say the least.