I applaud you for your accomplishments BRB. Making varsity as a 10th grader is certainly an accomplishment as is being a captain during a senior year. However, it still has every bit to do with the argument here. High School and College are two different games. There is a ton more pressure on both the players and the coaches. The coaches, especially in higher divisions, are being paid a handsome salary to bring success to their universities. You think you had the same coaches from ages 13-18 that Rutgers did with Mike Rice? Obviously, not every single coach goes to the limits that Rice did, but this naive and so heavily censored society would have their minds blown if they exploited every single college coach when put under the microscope. The pressure on athletes to perform is at an all time high. I, for one (while not approving much of the verbal slurs Rice used), am okay with the tough coaching that is given in college. It makes you a stronger athlete imo. I had extremely tough coaches in college. It made me work harder. But there were absolutely times here and there where if I thought I blinked wrong, I'd be replaced in the lineup the next day. It made me think a little more when I was out there sometimes. These sports are so mental.
You act as if Kreider, being that he is so highly touted, should have been able to just go out there and play. He is a human being. He is young and raw. My problem with Torts is that, I did not expect him to give Kreider such a huge role. BUT demotions to the 4th line and instant benchings for large portions of the game was not the answer. I wanted Torts to let Kreider learn from his mistakes by playing through them. Torts didn't have the time for it though. He let Miller have a longer leash. He let other guys continually have longer leashes. And this with a team that was offensively inept last year. We absolutely could've afforded the brainfarts from Kreider here and there in exchange for that snapshot and speed of his that could instantly tie a game if he gets into a groove. I agree he should've been more aggressive and tenacious. He should have. I fault him 75% for him on that, 25% for Tortorella. It is hard to play the game when you start second guessing yourself. It IS very natural to be less aggressive when you are overthinking because you become a step behind.
And Tort's "caveman simpletons hockey" was still the problem for everyone on that team. They all fell into the trap of falling back on the mentality to just dump and chase. Safe was not death. No one on that roster wanted to take chances. Gaborik was a completely different player here than when he was in Minnesota. Gaborik started dumping and chasing almost every shift. His creativity was gone. Same goes for Richards. Same goes for Del Zotto; nice rush up the ice, dumps to the corner and tries to beat the opposing defender to the puck. Same goes for their PP strategy. Tort's system called for defense and no offensive creativity. The players rather have dumped and chase than to "try and be a hero" by taking the puck into the zone themselves, deking a defender and going to the net with a scoring opportunity, because god forbid it doesn't work, there's a turnover and the opposing team scores off of it. Said player would be benched for at least a period, maybe the game. To call out Kreider for not being ballsy or creative is a little ridiculous imo.