Denmark doesn't like hockey? | Page 5 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Denmark doesn't like hockey?

Most of top European federations have transfer agreement with the NHL. Either vorky doesn't know about it, or he means that Sweden paved this way on terms that are not beneficial to the rest.
SHL and Allsvenskan are based in Sweden and are two of the biggest leagues but they have players from other countries. And it is certainly easier for NHL teams to sign players from these leagues, than say the KHL
 
Denmark is not like other Nordic countries. it is more like central european country with no winter sport culture. The only sport they are good at are cycling and badminton. They like football but they suck at it like most of european countries.
Huh? These countries have no winter sports culture?

1748444797703.png
 
I mean, the legal construction of the NHL TA is one-sided & unbalanced. And $ is close to peanuts.
Why would it be balanced if it was basically the NHL's goodwill? They could have gotten players for free. Yes, it's Hobson's choice, but still a choice.
The KHL didn't want to give away players for "peanuts" and now lets them go for nothing, happily covering those transfers in the media (Demidov). Although knowing the general context of your posts, I will assume that you will say that the KHL made an excellent decision and is in better conditions than the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoundAndFury
Why would it be balanced if it was basically the NHL's goodwill? They could have gotten players for free. Yes, it's Hobson's choice, but still a choice.
The KHL didn't want to give away players for "peanuts" and now lets them go for nothing, happily covering those transfers in the media (Demidov). Although knowing the general context of your posts, I will assume that you will say that the KHL made an excellent decision and is in better conditions than the rest.
Look, the rules should be balanced. All problem begins with article 8.1 of the IIHF International Transfer Regulations, follows by NHL TA. The guys who are behind this, and we know the name of that national federation, should be banned from hockey for life.
 
All problem begins with article 8.1 of the IIHF International Transfer Regulations, follows by NHL TA.
It says "All MNAs, their leagues, and clubs must respect all existing and valid Contracts of Players playing in other MNAs or Non-Member Organizations". What exact problem begins with respecting contracts?
 
It says "All MNAs, their leagues, and clubs must respect all existing and valid Contracts of Players playing in other MNAs or Non-Member Organizations". What exact problem begins with respecting contracts?
Bold part.

In context of all rules, European clubs & leagues (under IIHF jurisdiction) have to respect the players´ contracts with NHL clubs (Non-Member Organization). That is OK, I agree. The problem is what is missing .... NHL clubs are not obligated to respect the players´ contracts with European clubs (IIHF jurisdiction). There is no legal reason for that.

The KHL did the same, became a Non-Member Organization ... btw, whoever could do it, SHL, Liiga, DEL... but, someone added that rule/s into legal documents to benefit just ONE LEAGUE - NHL. So, they had to change the definition of Non-Member Organization in a hurry.

Hockey people, meaning from Europe, who were behind this & NHL TA should have never worked in hockey. They have deliberately weakened the legal position of the European hockey or were bribed by someone.
 
NHL clubs are not obligated to respect the players´ contracts with European clubs (IIHF jurisdiction). There is no legal reason for that.
The players, however, are responsible for the contracts that they sign. As a result we have a transfer agreement that compensates the European clubs directly and lets the players off the hook when they sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
The players, however, are responsible for the contracts that they sign. As a result we have a transfer agreement that compensates the European clubs directly and lets the players off the hook when they sign.
Irrelevant. I am talking about something else.
 
No, the Danes do not like hockey.

According to the Danish federal statistical agency, StatBank Denmark, hockey doesn't even crack the top 10 sports with the highest participation rate amongst its population. Soccer is the #1 most popular sport by a large margin. Internationally, they tend to do well in soccer, handball, badminton, and cycling.

The Danish populace has absolutely zero interest in hockey. Last year, they only had 5808 registered hockey players against a population of ~5.8M people. By comparison, Finland has roughly the same sized population, but 10x the number of registered hockey players. Even Latvia, a country with roughly one-third of Denmark's population, has close to twice as many registered hockey players.

Canada should be deeply embarrassed to have been upset by the Danes this week. At least when Canada was upset by Latvia at the WC in 2021, someone in Latvia cared.
Hockey in Denmark are 2 in numbers of fans watching live in the arenas , only soccer have more people
 
Stockholm isn't much of a hockey city, sports wise it's mostly football. Also hockey in late spring, when it's starting to get sunny or warm outside, I think is weird to a lot of people. It would make more sense in the winter. Toronto drew a good crowd (I think) when they were here with Willy over the winter months.
well thats a stretch, hockey is defintly 2nd in sthlm, as shown when DIF-AIK competed
for SHL place, when i was a kid hockey was no1, but it was a long time ago.
 
this older article says its quite popular, translated from danish

The Ice Hockey World Championship in Herning and Copenhagen is the biggest sporting event ever on Danish soil, and the ice hockey fever that the event and the Danish players have created has also caused the viewing figures on TV to grow explosively compared to both expectations and previous experiences.

The viewer interest culminated on Tuesday, May 15, when Denmark played the last and decisive group match against Latvia – a direct duel for a quarter-final spot. The match was broadcast on TV 2 and TV 2 PLAY and had an average of 519,000 viewers and a viewership share of 36 percent among all Danes.

Since most people watched the last minutes of the match, when Latvia ran away with the victory, the viewing figure was 760,000.

This makes the World Championship match Denmark-Latvia the most watched ice hockey broadcast ever on Danish television. Until yesterday, Denmark's World Cup match against Norway in November 1999 was the most watched ice hockey broadcast with an average of 310,000 viewers for the three periods. In some cases, ice hockey summaries on TV 2 have had more than half a million viewers.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
Having slaves and colonialism is civilized? Ok buddy.
The derivation and evolution of the terms civil, civilised and civilisation is long and complex, from Latin roots up through the Enlightenment. When you realize the positions of many Enlightenment thinkers regarding slavery and colonialism, you come to see that those f***ers were often full of shit. Said a different way, to the people who started using “civilized” the way we think of it now, many did think those things you reference fit the bill.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad