DiglettDangles
Registered User
If the EDM 1st round pick in exchange for Chiarot @50% was actually Holloway, I could probably be convinced to add a 2nd round pick and/or a prospect.
don't know why we're taking two dumps plus giving up allan . will sell them separately.Chiarot at 50% + Allan for Edmonton 1st + Turris + Lavoie + Koskinen
Lol you’re gonna get flamed for even saying this… and rightfully soIf the EDM 1st round pick in exchange for Chiarot @50% was actually Holloway, I could probably be convinced to add a 2nd round pick and/or a prospect.
If the EDM 1st round pick in exchange for Chiarot @50% was actually Holloway, I could probably be convinced to add a 2nd round pick and/or a prospect.
But how can we say no to the added 2nd round pick?That is absurd.
If the EDM 1st round pick in exchange for Chiarot @50% was actually Holloway, I could probably be convinced to add a 2nd round pick and/or a prospect.
To
Oilers
Dermott
To
Toronto
2022 3rd
2023 5th
Hes a solid player with good speed and good outlet pass. His d zone work is average but not a liability. Low risk for a potential high reward, and when your left side gets healthy dermott is good on both sides and would be great playoff depth.
To
Oilers
Dermott
To
Toronto
2022 3rd
2023 5th
Hes a solid player with good speed and good outlet pass. His d zone work is average but not a liability. Low risk for a potential high reward, and when your left side gets healthy dermott is good on both sides and would be great playoff depth.
I'd probably do this as well if we can get the money to work. If you take Turris (and drop him in the minors for all I care) or someone like that to even out money I'd say let's move forward.I'd do this
I want no part of Giordano under any circumstances.Would Oiler fans be okay with
1st + Kassian
for Giordano @50%?
It is a head scratcher. Would you have traded away Caufield for a rental + 2nd round pick last trade deadline? Give your head a shake.I completely understand you want to keep Holloway, no problem with that. I didn't know EDM actually loved him that much as from my POV he hasn't over- or under-performed his draft rank. He's close to the NHL because he's a big boi and your only relevant fwd prospect (nope, not a fan of Lavoie).
Now if the argument is that EDM will need talent on ELC next year I have no problem with that.
The discussion about Chiarot @50% was that MTL could likely get a late 1st straight up at the TDL, and yours will likely be in the late 20's vs Holloway who was drafted at 14. MTL's 2nd will likely be ~35 and we have a good pool of tier 2 prospects, so I don't think value wise it's ridiculous (but admittedly maybe light) to consider 14 vs 27(Chiarot@50% equiv) + 35 (+prospect), especially that you finally appear to know how to draft in the 2nd round.
I completely understand you want to keep Holloway, no problem with that. I didn't know EDM actually loved him that much as from my POV he hasn't over- or under-performed his draft rank. He's close to the NHL because he's a big boi and your only relevant fwd prospect (nope, not a fan of Lavoie).
Now if the argument is that EDM will need talent on ELC next year I have no problem with that.
The discussion about Chiarot @50% was that MTL could likely get a late 1st straight up at the TDL, and yours will likely be in the late 20's vs Holloway who was drafted at 14. MTL's 2nd will likely be ~35 and we have a good pool of tier 2 prospects, so I don't think value wise it's ridiculous (but admittedly maybe light) to consider 14 vs 27(Chiarot@50% equiv) + 35 (+prospect), especially that you finally appear to know how to draft in the 2nd round.
It is a head scratcher. Would you have traded away Caufield for a rental + 2nd round pick last trade deadline? Give your head a shake.
Adding 2nds does nothing for Oilers and Chiarot is certainly not worth a 1st to EDM.
For the third post in a row (and to echo what I have said before), if you wouldn't have traded Caufield for the package a year ago, we aren't interested in trading Holloway for it today. I think that is a safe statement.I completely understand you want to keep Holloway, no problem with that. I didn't know EDM actually loved him that much as from my POV he hasn't over- or under-performed his draft rank. He's close to the NHL because he's a big boi and your only relevant fwd prospect (nope, not a fan of Lavoie).
Now if the argument is that EDM will need talent on ELC next year I have no problem with that.
The discussion about Chiarot @50% was that MTL could likely get a late 1st straight up at the TDL, and yours will likely be in the late 20's vs Holloway who was drafted at 14. MTL's 2nd will likely be ~35 and we have a good pool of tier 2 prospects, so I don't think value wise it's ridiculous (but admittedly maybe light) to consider 14 vs 27(Chiarot@50% equiv) + 35 (+prospect), especially that you finally appear to know how to draft in the 2nd round.
For the third post in a row (and to echo what I have said before), if you wouldn't have traded Caufield for the package a year ago, we aren't interested in trading Holloway for it today. I think that is a safe statement.
I do think we have another very good forward prospect though in Xavier Bourgault. He looked really good in camp. So let's hold back on the "only relevant forward prospect" stuff.
For the third post in a row (and to echo what I have said before), if you wouldn't have traded Caufield for the package a year ago, we aren't interested in trading Holloway for it today. I think that is a safe statement.
I do think we have another very good forward prospect though in Xavier Bourgault. He looked really good in camp. So let's hold back on the "only relevant forward prospect" stuff.
La isnt making it into playoffs and oilers need quick and doughty realistically if they want to get far into the playoffs and la needs to retain on doughty and will get compensated.
To edm
Quick 1m retained
Doughty 5m retained
To la
Kosk
Barrie
Broberg
Savoie
22 1st
24 1st
23 2nd
24 3rd
What are you smoking.
No. Giordano for just one year is not greatWould Oiler fans be okay with
1st + Kassian
for Giordano @50%?
What are you smoking.