3ladesof5teel
Registered User
- Feb 20, 2012
- 6,483
- 4,183
No, glad some of the board isn't making GM calls ( not directed at you) but the pile on of players is tiring
Jake on the other hand does play well with good quick players and is used as a PK guy. He never really meshed with Krejci though with his slower style of attack on offence. Jake is a true north south guy. DeBrusk was also really good on the PP, he has a knack for deflecting pucks but stubborn Cassidy refuses to use him in that role. Jake a few years ago scored a lot of goals that way.Because Kapanen isn't a very good in-zone offensive player. Most of his chances come off the rush via turnovers in the d-zone. It's what makes him so dangerous when put on a 3rd line with defensive usage.
He has a long track record of not working well with elite players now.
If Kapanen is that cheap, Canucks offer Motte+Schenn+Halak for Kapanen
Excellent bottom 6 forward who is only a year younger than Kapanen, solid physical bottom pairing rhd, and one of the best backup goalies in the NHL.
How is that a bad offer when you're willing to take Debrusk with a small add?This isn't NHL 22
That's like me offering Heinen, Ruhwedel and DeSmith for Garland.
Seems to favor the Bruins. Don’t know why Pitt does this.Is this a reasonable basis for a deal? The Penguins have seemingly tired of Kapanen at this point and DeBrusk asked for a trade a little while back. Both are about the same age and make about the same amount of money. Kapanen has been a bit more productive, so I think he might have a tad more value than DeBrusk, but is something around this basis reasonable?
Because Kapanen isn't a very good in-zone offensive player. Most of his chances come off the rush via turnovers in the d-zone. It's what makes him so dangerous when put on a 3rd line with defensive usage.
He has a long track record of not working well with elite players now.
i was wondering if a korpisalo from cbj to pitt for kapanenen would be feasibile. been hearing wants a goalie other than desmith. cbj needs somebody to replace robinson. thoughts on thisDoesn't work with the money in and out. It would need to be Kassian. Hell, make it Yamamoto and Kassian for Kapanen as far as I'm concerned, ha ha.
i was wondering if a korpisalo from cbj to pitt for kapanenen would be feasibile. been hearing wants a goalie other than desmith. cbj needs somebody to replace robinson. thoughts on this
I think the Oilers could use an upgrade at RW. How about something around a Kassian - Kapanen swap?
What does the above sentence even mean?And exactly what are you address by to make it worth their wild?
What does the above sentence even mean?
DeBrusk has more points than Kapanen in less games , so why under value DeBrusk ?
DeBrusk has more points than Kapanen in less games , so why under value DeBrusk ?
DeBrusk has those same concerns no? I don't think he's nearly as talented as Kapanen, so with those same concerns I just don't see why Pens would want him. If they were to trade Kapanen which is possible then they could do better I think.
DoneIf Kapanen is that cheap, Canucks offer Motte+Schenn+Halak for Kapanen
Excellent bottom 6 forward who is only a year younger than Kapanen, solid physical bottom pairing rhd, and one of the best backup goalies in the NHL.
Who is sami? His dad as long retired .I think Debrusk has somehow become underrated because of how bad he was last year. I think Kapanen is a slightly better player. Bruins would have to add a little. They also play the opposite side and Jake is a better defender while Sami is a better point producer. They are similar players on the opposite wing on opposite ends of the error bars. I could see how teams would want to swap players like this. I just don't think the Pens and Bruins are making a trade for roster players like this.
Who is sami? His dad as long retired .