The fact that PK and Price didn't have the rosters is exactly what I'm saying. To get the type of offensive firepower you need to complement a PK and Price, you have to draft them.
Regarding McJesus and Drai, they are now part of a perennial contender. Our playoff success was always a random unrepeatable fluke. Skinner screwed them last year. It got to a point where almost everything was going in. No one can win in that suituation. Give them at least a respectable goalie and we might be singing different tune about them this year.
To answer your question, yes, I think Michkov is a better prospect than Reinbacher. I think he's the second-best prospect in the draft while Reinbacher was a late-rising 2-way defenseman that squeaked into the top 10 and I believe was overvalued due to him being the best defenseman in a weak draft for D. I'm not sold on him. Here are my issues:
-He doesn't have the size to be dominant (He's 6'2", not 6'7" Victor Hedman)
-He's physical in that he goes into corners and battles, but he's not physical at all in the punishing sense
-His offensive upside is questionable. His shot is decent and his passing is ok, but I don't see high-end offensive decision-making going on there.
-To give him his due, his skating is pretty good.
Now, Michkov has his deficiencies as well. He's not big (though he acquits himself well in corners and puck battles), his skating is average and he gets lost in his zone a la Will Smith. However, the offensive instinct is chess-master level, the puck skills are out of this world, and the shot is a laser.
I usually find elite skill translates to the NHL better than just being ok at everything. Reinbacher's profile worries me because there's nothing about his game that screams dominant #1 defenseman... And you shouldn't be drafting just Ok players at 5 overall.