You got me. I regret my whole "anyone who thinks Stepan was a
cap dump is an
imbecile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/274f1/274f1e19c7129241ef4f3ef810a65d105342aaec" alt="biglaugh :biglaugh: :biglaugh:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/274f1/274f1e19c7129241ef4f3ef810a65d105342aaec" alt="biglaugh :biglaugh: :biglaugh:"
ruse.
Stepan, a playmaking center, had been a Ranger his entire seven-year career, and had appeared in 97 playoff games with the team. But he has four years remaining on his six-year, $39 million contract, with an annual cap hit of $6.5 million, and after July 1 would have been able to invoke a no-trade clause to block any deal. He had 17 goals and 38 assists this season.
Rangers Trade Derek Stepan to Coyotes Ahead of N.H.L. Draft
Anyway, the analogy like it or not, wasn't my crux. It was the shiny new toy syndrome. I probably could have used an example from every single season, but this was a recent one.
Also, you are definitely showing you don't remember what led to the Stepan trade at all. It was a
cap dump because of his cap hit, years remaining , and no trade clause coming in after UFA day. The trade WAS NOT specifically for ADA.
The Rangers liked Stepan, but neither at his new price nor with the direction the team was heading, hence he was dumped [the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/274f1/274f1e19c7129241ef4f3ef810a65d105342aaec" alt="biglaugh :biglaugh: :biglaugh:"
imbecile
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/274f1/274f1e19c7129241ef4f3ef810a65d105342aaec" alt="biglaugh :biglaugh: :biglaugh:"
word being cap dump] because he was dumped for financial reasons in regard to the cap.
Think of it as if instead of being dumped for being bad he was cap dumped because he was dumped for the cap.