Longshot
Registered User
No, it doesn't. Those guys played in the NHL, and proved that they weren't ready.
So a young prospect that comes up and isn't ready during his first run in the NHL is a bust and is no good? Okay then.
No, it doesn't. Those guys played in the NHL, and proved that they weren't ready.
If I remember correctly, he said he had several years left on his current deal, which to me means more than two years at the minimum.
The point being that while every NHL team has potential NHLers, Burke has significantly improved the quality of ours. Our future is brighter because of him, and we will reap the rewards of his work for years to come.
Rielly, Finn, Biggs, Percy, Kadri, Blacker, D'Amigo, Ross, McKegg, Nilsson, Brown
These guys are the picks that Burke made in 4 drafts. They are all quality picks and have potential (some better then others) to have an impact at the NHL level. I may be forgetting a couple too.
Not too mention Joe Colborne and Jake Gardiner, Ben Scrivens, Tyler Bozak, Jussi Ryannas, Carter Ashton who he brought in through FA/Trades.
Heck Phil Kessel is what? 24? Still crazy young.
To say Brian Burke hasn't helped build this team is nuts
Funny how Nonis never listed Kadri as a building block.
Bye bye Nazim?
I really really hope Nonis makes own decisions and doesn't act MLSE puppet.
Secondly, I also hope he doesn't trade away Gardiner or our 1st for Bobby Lu. I'd be pretty saddened if that were to happen.
Okay, but all of the players drafted and acquired by Ferguson have had twice as much time to establish themselves as those acquired by Burke. All of those guys that are now NHL regulars were drafted by Ferguson seven or eight years ago.
The players acquired by Burke have only been in the Leafs system for two or three years maximum. Let's come back to this thread in two or three years and we probably will be saying the same thing about some of the players brought in by Burke.
The point is: it takes time. When Ferguson left everybody said: "He was terrible. The team is a disaster." (I was one of them!).
Four years later it turns out that Ferguson left behind more players than any of us thought.
The things you're saying about Burke now, today, people were saying about Ferguson when he was fired.
Okay, but all of the players drafted and acquired by Ferguson have had twice as much time to establish themselves as those acquired by Burke. All of those guys that are now NHL regulars were drafted by Ferguson seven or eight years ago.
The players acquired by Burke have only been in the Leafs system for two or three years maximum. Let's come back to this thread in two or three years and we probably will be saying the same thing about some of the players brought in by Burke.
The point is: it takes time. When Ferguson left everybody said: "He was terrible. The team is a disaster." (I was one of them!).
Four years later it turns out that Ferguson left behind more players than any of us thought.
The things you're saying about Burke now, today, people were saying about Ferguson when he was fired.
So if you were to compare 4 years of drafting and the success/bust rate of what was percieved talent it is pretty easy to see that JFJ's front office was better at scouting then Burke although both administrations leave much to be desired with player development.
I hope that Nonis has the spunk and aggressiveness of Burke, but will also be more modern so that he will allow players to pick their own numbers (even high ones) without stupid arguments, not have an Xmas break, and not have those stupid rules about contracts. If you're good we want you long term, cmon.
Time to get my popcorn ready, we are definitely the center of the hockey universe baby!
So a young prospect that comes up and isn't ready during his first run in the NHL is a bust and is no good? Okay then.
I don't think you can make that conclusion. At this point we don't know that the quality of Burke's crop of players is worse than Ferguson's. It's still too early in the process to know for sure.
However, I'm suggesting that there is evidence that there is a strong nucleus of young players on the cusp of coming to the NHL. The Marlies played in the AHL finals last year and are one of the better AHL teams this year. Several of those young players debuted in the NHL last year and might be playing in the league right now if it wasn't for the lock out.
Obviously you disagree, but neither of us know for sure.
To the point I made a few posts ago, JFJ also had a ton of failed prospects who we all remember who were highly touted so it stands to reason half of Burke's prospects are also going to fail that might look good now.
Agreed problem is Toronto fans expecting miracles !!! Give a guy 5 yrs to turn around basically a AHL team into NHL team ... Not try to be harsh but it was BAD and a lot of you need to recognise this including the owners
McCowan just said Burke used a profanity at a board meeting and was chastised for it- and that board member had an axe to grind. Who knows.
Nevertheless, if it's a personal axe to grind behind the rationale, I'd be pissed. Not because I like Burke but because you don't run a sports franchise like that. That's a joke.
This is pure gold.
Leafs continue being the laughing stock of North American sports.
McCowan just said Burke used a profanity at a board meeting and was chastised for it- and that board member had an axe to grind. Who knows.
Nevertheless, if it's a personal axe to grind behind the rationale, I'd be pissed. Not because I like Burke but because you don't run a sports franchise like that. That's a joke.
http://www.mlse.com/inside_mlse/board_of_directors.aspx
Take your pick on who was offended by the profanity
I have my guess.
Purely personal opinions based poll, as very little information is known at this time. What do you think was the main reason behind MLSE board's decision to fire Burke?
I realize some may think there was multiple reasons, just select the most prominent one.