Player Discussion: David Jiricek

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,861
13,469
Canada
Yea what?

Am I missing something.


Evangelista would be sick trade for Jiricek. This team will always need scoring long term.
We have plenty of 2nd line and lower caliber players now and in the future. Wouldn't be excited in the slightest by an Evangelista trade
 

Napoli

Registered User
Oct 4, 2023
1,128
1,231
We have plenty of 2nd line and lower caliber players now and in the future. Wouldn't be excited in the slightest by an Evangelista trade
Eh, in today's NHL it's 3 line hockey. Evangelista is a potential 25+ goal scorer. Not sure what you expect to get for Jiricek but can't imagine it's far from that. Evangelista would be a good piece to add to the bunch.
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,861
13,469
Canada
Eh, in today's NHL it's 3 line hockey. Evangelista is a potential 25+ goal scorer. Not sure what you expect to get for Jiricek but can't imagine it's far from that. Evangelista would be a good piece to add to the bunch.
Not even close to what I'd want. Besides I'd be more expecting of a major offseason trade as Waddell is known to do if a trade does happen. I still think a trade is pure stupidity anyway
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,892
35,572
40N 83W (approx)
What position would Columbus need the most?
Biggest weak points are goaltending present and maybe long-term (altho Ivanov is looking really good :) ) and RD long-term (presuming a Jiricek trade, of course). Aside from that, most of what we're trying to do is get kids and thus the roster as a whole up to speed promptly, which ends up prompting interest in Specific Guys On The Rise We Like.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad