That’s a good offer, but he’s LHD and we already have Mateychuk waiting in the pipelineMukhamadullin +
That’s a good offer, but he’s LHD and we already have Mateychuk waiting in the pipeline
Thats MateychukI figured he could be a replacement for Provorov.
Honestly, I would probably consider Shakir to place on the third pair once and if Provorov is goneI figured he could be a replacement for Provorov.
It's likely to be a 1 for 1. Jackets dont need quantity over quality. I personally am not super interested in Reinbacher. We have defensemen beating down the door. Likely the deal will be for a forward.Lowest of the two 2025 1st + Beck + Mailloux?
As a Habs fan everyone is on the table for Jiricek but Demidov.
Reinbacher, 1 for 1?
Lowest of the two 2025 1st + Beck + Mailloux?
They might consider Reinbacher I guess.As a Habs fan everyone is on the table for Jiricek but Demidov.
Reinbacher, 1 for 1?
Lowest of the two 2025 1st + Beck + Mailloux?
Lindstrom's injury is a big problem, I agree... He was DND in the top 10 for me for that reason.Why are you giving up on Reinbacher already ? He’s been injured lately so I’m not too fond of that as we have Lindstrom in a similar situation
Because Reinbacher's D+1 was abysmal, and his D+2 was lost entirely to injury, and all that when he was a massive reach in the first place. He's in a far worse place in terms of value relative to selection than Jiricek, and even if Columbus was interested in another defenseman, they would be the immediate and future losers in a one-for-one trade.Why are you giving up on Reinbacher already ? He’s been injured lately so I’m not too fond of that as we have Lindstrom in a similar situation
Jiricek is literally playing in the AHL.
“Willingness to play in the AHL” is not a selling point for Columbus nor does it add value to the other player.
There is zero reason for Columbus to consider dealing Jiricek for Mailloux.
by comparison, jiricek's D+1 was incredible (straight to AHL, was rookie of the year there), his D+2 saw him yo-yo'd by a coach who had no business running an NHL bench and a GM who was on his way out, and now in his D+3 he got sent down because he wasn't going to get minutes behind severson and fabbro.Because Reinbacher's D+1 was abysmal, and his D+2 was lost entirely to injury, and all that when he was a massive reach in the first place. He's in a far worse place in terms of value relative to selection than Jiricek, and even if Columbus was interested in another defenseman, they would be the immediate and future losers in a one-for-one trade.
I wonder if a Heinola-Jiricek swap might be an interesting start. Would be interesting to see who would add. Guessing Winnipeg might add something.Hope the Jets are checking in, our defense pipeline is weak.
If there was any souring of relationships it was with Jarmo. Evason has spoken highly of him.Clearly the relationship has soured
If this winds up being the case, we have a precedent with this, the Rutger McGroarty trade. If we were to trade him it would like be a similar 1 for 1.It’s tough to be in a position to potentially lose a top prospect. I’m not trying to provide a reason for CLB to trade Jiricek, that’s all been stated previously.
I think teams acquiring Jiricek could be concerned about whether they’d meet his expectations of playing a consistent role in the NHL and whether he’d be willing to work with the team if his development path was in the AHL. If Columbus were to acquire a player like Mailloux (or any other prospect more amenable to receiving direction from their organization), they aren’t facing the same issues.
So… trading a prospect that either doesn’t want to play for your organization or is unwilling to follow the development path laid out by the organization for a very similar prospect that doesn’t have those issues sounds like a decent option. Especially if your team is fond of big, puck moving RD that are PPG in the AHL.
I don’t think MTL does this, I just think it’s more likely than them trading an injured player or one of their few center prospects.