Tied for 2nd in goals with Marchand. I don't think that you can ask much more from him. Certainly doing better than Loui was in his first season.
Ya mean the season that he was concussed after 8 games? He had 14 points in his first 21 Bruins games.
Tied for 2nd in goals with Marchand. I don't think that you can ask much more from him. Certainly doing better than Loui was in his first season.
Ya mean the season that he was concussed after 8 games? He had 14 points in his first 21 Bruins games.
Tied for 2nd in goals with Marchand. I don't think that you can ask much more from him. Certainly doing better than Loui was in his first season.
Tied for 2nd in goals with Marchand. I don't think that you can ask much more from him. Certainly doing better than Loui was in his first season.
Backes has still brought more to the table than Loui the loser.
Eriksson had two concussions. Perhaps you've (conveniently) forgotten that.
And what has Backes won? We know that you've really had it in for Eriksson—I assume that it's because he's a "soft Euro" who doesn't fight—but I don't see Backes as the superior talent.
I tried to like Loui, I tried to buy into the Bergeron on the wing, great two way player, underrated stuff. I tried to give him a break after the injures but I could not stand his invisible, boring, ineffective play. Not all Euros are soft, Radko Gudas can come on in anytime he would like and I'll take a legit goal scoring european forward any day.
It's absolutely a playing style issue with me, for the same money and same production I will always take the player who plays with grit, hits, fights and plays mean over an Eriksson type.
The loser tag for Loui was more to encompass his lack of production, effort and grit while in Boston as opposed to post season wins, neither has been overly successful in the playoffs, but I would still rather go into a playoff series with Backes than Eriksson.
I hated Louii, but thus far, while Backes, I agree, is a player I'd rather have for the reasons you mention, can't say that I'm happy with him, either. They say he's a slow starter. Fine. We'll have to wait, I guess.
How can you hate Loui? He played fine when injury free. Too many people think about Seguin when his name comes up. He was a good player here. Having said that, I like what he brings but I am concerned about that 6mi average.
Backes brings it every game. I'm a fan
I heard this a lot about Belesky last year...
Sweeney is still building a team to compete in 2008. It's 2016. His model is all wrong.
It's tough to deny Loui is the better player but Backes is the more physical. Backes is a food fit but he clearly doesn't have the pure talent of Eriksson.
Doesn't seem to "fit" too well right now.